Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Study of the Development of Innovative Activities in Oil and Gas Regions Using a Cross-Methodological Approach

  • INDUSTRIES AND INTERINDUSTRY COMPLEXES
  • Published:
Studies on Russian Economic Development Aims and scope

Abstract—

The paper examines the impact of innovations on the socioeconomic development of the oil and gas regions of Russia. It applies a cross-methodical approach, including cluster analysis, panel data analysis and cognitive modeling. Each method performs its function in the research process: cluster analysis—multifactorial systematics of regions, analysis of panel data—obtaining quantitative estimates of the impact of resource and innovation factors on GRP, and cognitive modeling—building scenario forecasts for the socioeconomic development of an oil and gas region. As a result, the features of the interaction between the oil and gas sector and the sphere of innovation activity were revealed, and the nature of their influence on the growth of the economy of the regions of the Russian Federation was determined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The source of data for the clustering parameters is the issues of the statistical collection “Regions of Russia. Socioeconomic Indicators” published by the Federal State Statistics Service. https://rosstat.gov.ru/folder/210/document/13204.

  2. The source of data for the cognitive model is the issues of the statistical collection “Regions of Russia. Socioeconomic Indicators” published by the Federal State Statistics Service. https://rosstat.gov.ru/folder/210/document/13204. Statistical Yearbook of the Tomsk oblast for 2012–2018. https://tmsk.gks.ru/folder/37342; report on the tax base and the structure of accruals for MET (Form no. 5—MET) for 2008–2018 for the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, which is published by the Federal Tax Service. https://www.nalog.ru/rn89/rdlated_activities/statistics_and_-analytics/forms/#t1.

  3. Official Internet portal of the Administration of the Tomsk oblast. Strategy for Socioeconomic Development of the Tomsk Oblast until 2030. https://tomsk.gov.ru/ctrategija-sotsialno-ekonomicheskogo-razvitija-tomskoj-oblasti-do-2030-goda.

  4. Forecast of the Socioeconomic Development of the Russian Federation for the Period up to 2036, 2018.

  5. State report on the state and use of mineral resources of the Russian Federation in 2020/Ed by E.I. Petrov, D.D. Tetenkin. Ministry of Natural Resources and Ecology of the Russian Federation. Federal Agency for Subsoil Use (Rosnedra). Moscow, 2021, pp. 22, 42, 51, 66. https://www.rosnedra.gov.ru/article/13931.html.

REFERENCES

  1. P. A. Drogovoz and E. A. Dragun, “Review and classification of economic and mathematical models for assessing the innovative development of Russian regions,” Ross. Ekon. Vestn. 2 (5), 59–66 (2019).

  2. T. V. Pogodina, “Economic analysis and assessment of innovative activity and competitiveness of the regions of the Volga Federal District,” Ekon. Anal: Teor. Prakt. 20 (5), 16–22 (2004).

  3. N. V. Apatova, “Economic-mathematical model of innovative development of the region,” Uch. Zap. Tavrich. Nats. Univ. im. V.I. Vernadskogo, Ser.: Ekon. Upr. 22 (61) (1), 3–8 (2009).

  4. O. N. Vladimirova, “Methodological approaches to the formation of the rating of innovative susceptibility of the region,” Initsiativy XXI Veka, Nos. 4–5, 68–72 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  5. O. A. Donichev, Z. V. Mishchenko, and D. Yu. Fraimovich, “Modeling of innovative and reproductive development of the region on the basis of a multi-level characteristic of the integral indicator,” Ekon., Stat. Inf. Vestn. UMO, No. 3, 125–130 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. A. Kaneva and G. A. Untura, Models for Assessing the Impact of the Knowledge Economy on Economic Growth and Regional Innovation, Ed. by V. I. Suslov (Inst. Ekon. Org. Prom. Proizvod., Novosibirsk, 2021) [in Russian].

  7. A. B. Gusev, “Formation of ratings of innovative development of regions of Russia,” Nauka. Innovatsii. Obrazov. 4 (1), 158–173 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  8. I. V. Pan’shin and T. N. Kashitsyna, “Improving the methodology of component assessment of the level of development of the region’s innovative infrastructure,” Reg. Ekon.: Teor. Prakt., No. 30, 43–53 (2009).

  9. A. V. Samarukha, A. N. Dulesov, and G. I. Krasnov, “Efficiency of innovation processes during the transformation of the regional economy,” Izv. Irkutsk. Gos. Ekon. Akad., No. 2, 48–53 (2009).

  10. A. I. Alekseev, E. M. Andreev, V. S. Belozerov, et al., “Russia of regions: In what social space do we live?,” in Independent Institute for Social Policy (Pomatur, Moscow, 2005) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  11. Report “Science and technology foresight of the Russian Federation: Regional aspect,” Center for Strategic Research “North-West.” https://www.csr-nw.ru/files/csr/file_category_172.pdf.

  12. V. L. Abashkin, G. I. Abdrakhmanova, S. V. Bredikhin, et al., Rating of Innovative Development of Constituent Entities of the Russian Federation (Vysshaya Skola Ekon., Moscow, 2021) [in Russian]. https://doi.org/10.17323/978-5-7598-2390-2

  13. A. D. Andersen, A. Marin, and E. O. Simensen, “Innovation in natural resource-based industries: A pathway to development? Introduction to special issue,” Innovation Dev. 1 (8), 1–27 (2018).https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2018.1439293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. A. Sasson and A. Blomgren, Knowledge based oil and gas industry, Research Report, 3/2011, BI Norwegian Business School, Department of Strategy and Logistics, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  15. C. Sabel and G. Herrigel, “Collaborative innovation in the Norwegian oil and gas industry: Surprise or sign of a new economy-wide paradigm?,” in Petroleum Industry Transformations (Routledge, London, 2018).

    Google Scholar 

  16. V. Fernandez, “Innovative intensity in the mining industry: Evidence from patent families,” Resour. Policy, No. 78, 102805 (2022).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102805

  17. Y. O. Akinwale, “Empirical analysis of inbound open innovation and small and medium-sized enterprises' performance: Evidence from oil and gas industry,” S. Afr. J. Econ. Manage. Sci., 1 (21), a1608 (2018). doi https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v21i1.1608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. N. A. Sokolov and S. N. Larin, “Prospects for the development of the oil and gas sector of the Russian economy in the context of the implementation of import substitution programs,” Byull. Nauki Prakt. 4 (1), 191–206 (2018). http://www.bulletennauki.com/sokolov-na.

  19. V. Kryukov and A. Tokarev, “Spatial trends of innovation in the Russian oil and gas sector: What does patent activity in Siberia and the Arctic reflect?,” Reg. Sci. Policy Pract. 1 (14), 127–146 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. S. A. Samusenko, G. I. Popodko, and T. S. Zimnyakova, “Empirical analysis of imperfections in innovative systems of resource and nonresource regions of Russia,” Reg. Res. Russ. 11, 101–112 (2021).https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970521010123

  21. M. E. Lebedeva, “Development of the knowledge economy in cooperation with the resource sector on the example of Tomsk oblast,” in Interexpo GEO-Siberia 2020. The 16th International Scientific Congress: A collection of Writings in 8 Volumes, vol. 3: National Scientific Conference “Economic Development of Siberia and the Far East. Economics of nature management, land management, forest management, real estate management (Sib. Gos. Univ. Geosist. Tekhnol., Novosibirsk, 2020). No. 1, pp. 131–143. https://doi.org/10.33764/2618-981X-2020-3-1-13 1-143

  22. M. E. Lebedeva and V. V. Shmat, “‘Shine and poverty’ of resource economies. Economic systematics of the countries of the world on the basis of resource and non-resource features,” ECO, No. 3, 78–105 (2020). https://doi.org/10.30680/ECO0131-7652-2020-3-78-105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. M. E. Morozova and V. V. Shmat, “Medium-term forecasting of Russian economy using cognitive model,” Stud. Russ. Econ. Dev. 28, 253–258 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. M. E. Morozova and V. V. Shmat, “Resources as a factor of economic systems in the analysis of the development potential of countries and territories, in Interexpo GEO-Siberia. The 14th International Scientific Congress. International Scientific Conference “Economic Development of Siberia and the Far East. Economics of Nature Management, Land Management, Forest Management, Real Estate Management”: A Collection of Writings in 2 Volumes (Sib. Gos. Univ. Geosist. Tekhnol., Novosibirsk, 2018), vol. 2, pp. 312–326.

  25. M. E. Morozova and V. V. Shmat, “Cognitive SWOT-analysis in the strategy of socio-economic development of the region,” in Economy of Siberia in the Context of Global Challenges of the 21st Century: Collection of Articles in 6 Vols., Vol. 2: How to Turn Space from a Curse into a Development Resource (Inst. Ekon. Org. Prom. Proizv., Novosibirsk, 2018), pp. 244–259.

  26. V. I. Maksimov, “Structural-target analysis of the development of socio-economic situations,” Probl. Upr., No. 3, 30–38 (2005).

  27. M. E. Lebedeva, “Fuzzy logic in economics – the formation of a new direction,” Idei Idealy 11 (1, pt. 1), 197–212 (2019). https://doi.org/10.17212/2075-0862-2019-11.1.1-197-212

  28. A. A. Shirov and A. A. Yantovskii, “Evaluation of multiplicative effects in the economy. Opportunities and limitations,” ECO 440 (2), 40–58 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  29. V. A. Kryukov, A. E. Sevastyanova, A. N. Tokarev, and V. V. Shmat, “A modern approach to the development and selection of strategic alternatives for the development of resource regions,” Ekon. Reg. 13 (1), 93–105 (2017). https://doi.org/10.17059/2017-1-9

Download references

Funding

The research was carried out with the plan of research work of the Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, project no. 5.6.3.2 (0260-2021-0004) “Resource-rich territories of Russia’s East and Arctic zones: Peculiar processes of interaction and interconnection between regional economies under contemporary conditions of scientific-technological and social challenges.”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090, Novosibirsk, Russia

    M. E. Lebedeva

Authors
  1. M. E. Lebedeva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. E. Lebedeva.

Ethics declarations

The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Translated by L. Solovyova

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lebedeva, M.E. A Study of the Development of Innovative Activities in Oil and Gas Regions Using a Cross-Methodological Approach. Stud. Russ. Econ. Dev. 34, 231–242 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075700723020077

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075700723020077

Keywords:

Search

Navigation