S.N. Rastvortseva and A. B. Amanalieva, “Analysis of national innovation systems based on the method of technological proximity,” Zh. Ekon. Teor. 17 (4), (2020).
K. Yu. Voloshenko, T. E. Drok, and Yu. Yu. Farafonova, “Economic complexity at the subnational level – an innovative paradigm of regional development,” Vopr. Innovatsionnoi Ekon. 9 (3), 735–752 (2019).
L. M. Gokhberg, T. E. Kuznetsova, and V. A. Rud’, “Analysis of innovative regimes in the Russian economy: Methodological approaches and first results,” Forsait 4 (3), 18–30 (2010).
E. V. Sumina, “System of indicators for assessing the effectiveness and level of development of innovative processes in the regional economy,” Approbatsiya, No. 2, 214–216 (2017).
Google Scholar
S. P. Glinkina, On the Issue of the Diversity of Models of Capitalism, or what We Have Built as a Result of Transformation: Report (Institute of Economics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 2016) [in Russian].
Google Scholar
C. A. Hidalgo, B. Klinger, A. L. Barabási, and R. Hausmann, “The product space conditions the development of nations,” Science 317 (5837), 482–487 (2007).
C. A. Hidalgo and R. Hausmann, “The building blocks of economic complexity,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106 (26), 10570–10575 (2009).
P.A. Hall and D. Soskice, Varieties of Capitalism: the institutional foundations of comparative advantage (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001).
Book
Google Scholar
E. Bartelsman, J. Haltiwanger, and J. Scarpetta, Microeconomic Evidence of Creative Destruction in Industrial and Developing Countries (World Bank, Washington, 2004).
Google Scholar
P. Klimek, R. Hausmann, and S. Thurner, “Empirical confirmation of creative destruction from world trade data,” PLoS One 7 (6), 1–9 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038924
P. L. Robertson and P.R. Patel, “New wine in old bottles: technology diffusion in developed economies,” Res. Policy 36 (5), 708–721 (2007).
C. M. Christensen, and M. E. Raynor, The Innovator’s Solution: sustaining and creating successful growth (Harvard Business School, Boston, MA, 2003).
Google Scholar
US Department of Labor, 2015. www.bls.gov/webapps/legacy/cesbtab1.htm.
US Department of Labor, 2015. www.bls.gov/webapps/legacy/cesbtab3.htm.
E. Kirner, S. Kinkel, and A. Jaeger, “Innovation paths and the innovation performance of low-technology firms—an empirical analysis of German industry,” Res. Policy 38 (3),447–458 (2009).
P. Moncada-Paternò-Castello, C. Ciupagea, K. Smith, A. Tübke, M. Tubbs, “Does Europe perform too little corporate R&D? A comparison of EU and non-EU corporate R&D performance,” Res. Policy 39 (4), 523–536 (2010).
C. Schneider and R. Veugelers, “On young highly innovative companies: Why they matter and how (not) to policy support them,” Ind. Corporate Change 19 (4), 969–1007 (2010).
R. Veugelers and M. Cincera, Young Leading Innovators and the EU’s R&D Intensity Gap. Bruegel Policy Contribution 2010/09 (Bruegel, Brussels, 2010).
Google Scholar
A. Leiponen and I. Drejer, “What exactly are technological regimes? Intra-industry heterogeneity in the organization of innovation activities,” Res. Policy 36 (8),1221–1238 (2007).
EU Commission (EC). Horizon 2020. 2014. http://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/.
K. Pavitt, “Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory,” Res. Policy 13 (6), 343–373 (1984).