Abstract—
The paper discusses the relationship between the total amount of budgetary funds spent on the agricultural sector and the dynamics of the industry in 2003–2018. Since the second half of the 2000s, government spending on agricultural support has been at a fairly high level, which is accompanied by a significant positive response from industry indicators. Based on the analysis, it has been found that government spending at the federal level significantly affects the creation of value added. The observed level of state intervention in the agricultural economy is sufficient to obtain the desired result of spending funds. However, this influence is less than could be supposed from the theoretically expected impact of the financial leverage of credit support. Regional costs, on the contrary, do not affect value added, i.e., the centralization of incentive policies in agriculture has proved to be justified.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
N. A. Borkhunov, “State support for agricultural development is increasing,” Ekon. Sel’sk. Khoz. Ross., No. 7, 41 (2007).
E. A. Shkarupa, “Development of state support for agriculture in Russia,” Vestn. Volgogr. Gos. Univ., Ser. 3, Ekon. Ekol., 2010, no. 2, pp. 84–88.
A. A. Grudkin, “Evaluation of the effectiveness of state support for agriculture,” Nikonovskie Chteniya, No. 14, 341–343 (2009).
V. A. Mal’tseva, “Assessment of state support for agriculture according to the WTO methodology (on the example of the Ural region),” Vopr. Ekon., No. 9, 145–159 (2014).
N. M. Svetlov, R. G. Yanbykh, and D. A. Loginova, “On the heterogeneity of the effects of state support for agriculture,” Vopr. Ekon., No. 4, 59–73 (2019).
I. N. Buzdalov and B. E. Frumkin, “The current situation in Russian agriculture and new requirements for agricultural policy,” O-vo. Ekon., No. 7, 100–124 (2014).
V. I. Denisov, “Acceleration of the development of agriculture in the Russian economy by increasing the efficiency of the state support of rural commodity producers,” Stud. Russ. Econ. Dev. 30, 66–73 (2019).
E. A. Gataulina and R. G. Yanbykh, “Agricultural lending: Modern challenges and solutions,” Ekon. Nauki, No. 3, 315–318 (2011).
E. A. Gataulina and V. Ya. Uzun, “State support for agriculture with respect to WTO, sanctions, and anti-sanctions,” EKO, No. 1, 115–123 (2015).
F. N. Mukhametgaliev, L. F. Sitdikova, F. F. Mukhametgalieva, E. R. Sadrieva, and F. N. Avkhadiev, “Trends in the formation of the current agrifood policy of Russia,” Stud. Russ. Econ. Dev. 30, 162–165 (2019).
A. G. Aganbegyan, “Agriculture: The locomotive of socio-economic growth of Russia,” EKO, No. 5, 5–22 (2017).
V. P. Neganova and A. V. Dudnik, “Improving state support for the agricultural sector of the region,” Ekon. Reg. 14 (2), 651–662 (2018).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Translated by L. Solovyova
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kalinin, A.M., Samokhvalov, V.A. Effectiveness of Financial Support to Agriculture: General Assessment and Inter-Budget Effect. Stud. Russ. Econ. Dev. 31, 565–572 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075700720050081
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075700720050081