Abstract—
The article presents a cognitive model for the support of decision-making in pursuing innovation economic policy with regard to the primary and agricultural sectors of the Russian economy. The methodological basis of the approach is the study of a directed graph representing the formalization of a cognitive scheme describing the interaction of many factors in a complex system of socio-economic relations at the level of the national economy. The results obtained by simulation modeling of five scenarios for the economic development of the Russian economy are discussed. The role of innovation and institutional changes and accomodative monetary policy in ensuring sustainable economic growth is shown.
REFERENCES
M. Allais, “Le comportament de l’homme rationnel devant le risque: Critique des postulats de l’ecole Americaine,” Econometrica, No. 21, 503–546 (1952).
R. M. Cyert, H. A. Simon, and D. B. Trow, “Observation of a business decision,” J. Bus., No. 29, 237–248 (1956).
V. Kuleshov, A. Alekseev, and M. Yagol’nitser, “The roadmap of the policy of re-industrialization: Cognitive tools,” Ekonomist, No. 10, 51–63 (2015).
The Order of the Government of the Russian Federation of November 17, 2008 No. 1662-p (as amended on September 28, 2018) On the Concept of the Long-Term Socio-Economic Development of the Russian Federation for the Period up to 2020 (together with the Concept of the Long-Term Socio-Economic Development of the Russian Federation for the Period until 2020). http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_ 82134/.
Shashank Gupta and Shalini Gupta, “Modeling economic system using fuzzy cognitive maps,” Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manage. 8, Suppl. 2, 1472–1486 (2017).
E. I. Papageorgiou, “Review study on fuzzy cognitive maps and their applications during the last decade,” in 2011 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ), pp. 828–835.
C. D. Stylios and P. P. Groumpos, “Mathematical formulation of fuzzy cognitive maps,” in Proceedings of the 7th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation (MED99), Haifa, 1999, pp. 2251–2261.
R. Taber and M. Siegel, “Estimation of expert credibility weights using fuzzy cognitive maps,” in Proceedings of the IEEE First International Conference on Neural Networks, San Diego, CA, 1987, pp. 319–325.
R. Axelrod, The Structure of Decision: Cognitive Maps of Political Elites (Princeton University Press, 1976).
F. S. Roberts, Discrete Mathematical Models with Applications to Social, Biological, and Environmental Problems (Pearson, 1976; Nauka, Moscow, 1986).
A. V. Alekseev, “In search of lost equilibrium: Between government regulation and market uncertainty,” EKO, No. 3, 101–120 (2018).
Portal of State Programs of the Russian Federation. https://programs.gov.ru/Portal/. Accessed March 20, 2018.
The Global Competitiveness Report. 2017–2018. https:// www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-competitiveness-report-2017-2018.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The work was carried out as part of the Integrated Basic Research Program of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences II.1 Project II.1 / XI.170 (no. 0325-2018-0001. “Improving the methodology of cognitive modeling and assessing the economic security of the growth in macro- and meso-economic indicators” (project “Assessment of strategic decisions in complex socio-economic systems: a cognitive approach.”)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated by I. Pertsovskaya
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kuleshov, V.V., Alekseev, A.V. & Yagol’nitser, M.A. Methods of Cognitive Analysis in Devising and Substantiating Strategies of Economic Development. Stud. Russ. Econ. Dev. 30, 185–191 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075700719020096
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075700719020096