Skip to main content
Log in

Development Prospects of Technological Integration: Regional Perspective

  • SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
  • Published:
Studies on Russian Economic Development Aims and scope

Abstract

Technological integration is considered as an effective measure to increase the technological performance of Russian industrial companies and improve their adaptation to a system of industrial and economic relations based on digital technology. Common issues related to integration of new technologies are identified for Russian regions, emphasizing the importance of cluster-type economic relations. A current state evaluation and a development forecast are given for petrochemical clusters. To improve technological performance, it is proposed to use technological integration as a process of transforming production resource flows into new technologies. The experience in technology advancement accumulated by world science has been investigated and summarized. It is shown that the Russian economy is on the right path to a new technological paradigm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Technological integration is a dynamic process of transforming production resource flows in the form of new technologies at the level of integrated business structures, as well as on a global scale, using the reserves of internal and external development.

REFERENCES

  1. Domestic costs of research and development in the regions of the Russian Federation. http://www.gks.ru/ wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_main/rosstat/ru/statistics/ science /#.

  2. Gross domestic expenditures on research and development by sector in % of GDP. http://ec.europa. eu/eurostat/data/database.

  3. Innovative activity of organizations by regions of the Russian Federation. http://www.gks.ru/wps/wcm/ connect/rosstat_main/rosstat/ru/statistics/science_ and_innovations/.

  4. T. J. Webster, “Malaysian economic development, leading industries and industrial clusters,” Singapore Econ. Rev. 59 (5) (2015). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217590814500441

  5. Association of clusters and technology parks. http://akitrf.ru/news/promyshlennye-klastery-sozdayut- usloviya-dlya-operezhayushchego-razvitiya-/.

  6. Map of clusters of Russia. http://clusters.monocore.ru/list.

  7. The Order of the Ministry of Industry of the Russian Federation and the Ministry of Energy of the Russian Federation of January 14, 2016 On Amendments to the Strategy for the Development of the Chemical and Petrochemical Complex for the Period until 2030, approved by the Order of the Ministry of Industry and Trade of Russia and the Ministry of Energy of Russia of April 8, 2014 No. 651/172. http://minpromtorg.gov.ru/ docs/orders/.

  8. The Share of Organizations that Carried Out Marketing Innovations in the Russian Federation over the Period of 2010–2016. http://www.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/ rosstat_main/rosstat/ru/statistics/science_and_innovations/science/.

  9. D. Audretsch and R. Caiazza, “Technology transfer and entrepreneurship: Cross-national analysis,” J. Technol. Transfer 41 (6), 1247–1259 (2016).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9441-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. D. Meissner, W. Polt, and N. S. Vonortas, “Towards a broad understanding of innovation and its importance for innovation policy,” J. Technol. Transfer 42 (5), 1184–1211 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9485-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. F. Landini, “The evolution of control in the digital economy,” J. Evol. Econ. 26 (2), 407–441 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. J. Wu, K. R. Harrigan, S. H. Ang, et al., “The impact of imitation strategy and R&D resources on incremental and radical innovation: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms,” J. Technol. Transfer (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9621-9

  13. K. R. Harrigan, M. C. Di Guardo, and B. Cowgill, “Multiplicative-innovation synergies: Tests in technological acquisitions,” J. Technol. Transfer 42 (5), 1212–1233 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9514-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. D. Meissner and E. G. Carayannis, “Value generation from industry-science linkages in light of targeted open innovation,” J. Knowl. Manage. 21 (2), 295–307 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-11-2016-0510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. S. Zambelli, T. Fredholm, and R. Venkatachalam, “Robust measurement of national technological progress,” Struct. Change Econ. Dyn. 42, 38–55 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2017.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. F. Duchin and St. H. Levine, “Choosing among alternative technologies: Conditions for assuring the feasibility of an input-output database or scenario,” Econ. Syst. Res. 29 (4), 541–556 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2017.1301396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. C. Richter, S. Kraus, A. Brem, S. Durst, and C. Giselbrecht, “Digital entrepreneurship: Innovative business models for the sharing economy,” Creativity Innovation Manage. 26 (3), 300–310 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Boglioni and S. Zambelli, “European economic integration and comparative advantages,” J. Econ. Surv. 31 (4), 1011–1034 (2017). https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. F. C. Benedetti, F. Biagi, and J. M. Boden, et al., Current Challenges in Fostering the European Innovation Ecosystem. EUR. Scientific and Technical Research Reports (2017). https://ec.europa.eu/.

  20. L. Lyu, W. Wu, H. Hu, et al., “An evolving regional innovation network: Collaboration among industry, university, and research institution in China’s first technology hub,” J. Technol. Transfer (2017). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9620-x.

  21. M. Peneder and G. Streicher, “De-industrialization and comparative advantage in the global value chain,” Econ. Syst. Res. 30 (14), 85–104 (2018). https:// doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2017.1320274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. F. Boundi Chraki, “Multiregional input-output analysis and economic integration in NAFTA. An application of a hypothetical extraction method,” Cuad. Econ. Spain 40 (114), 256–267 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2017.05.001

    Google Scholar 

  23. http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/m/beijing/zhongguancun/platforms.html/.

  24. E. E. Lehmann and M. Menter, “Public cluster policy and performance”, J. Technol. Transfer, 2017. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9626-4

  25. K. Schwab, The Urgency of Shaping the Fourth Industrial Revolution (World Economic Forum, 2018). http://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/01/the-urgency- of-shaping-the-fourth-industrial-revolution.

  26. Prime Ministers of the EAEU Countries Discussed Formats and Mechanisms for Interaction Digital Sphere. http://eurasiancommission.org/en/nae/news/ Pages/02-02-2018-3.aspx8.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. V. Kuznetsov.

Additional information

Translated by A. Kobkova

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kuznetsov, S.V., Miller, A.E. & Davidenko, L.M. Development Prospects of Technological Integration: Regional Perspective. Stud. Russ. Econ. Dev. 30, 15–21 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075700719010106

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075700719010106

Navigation