Abstract
This paper has analyzed and commented on the results of the regular survey of Russian real sector enterprises, which was conducted by the Institute of Economic Forecasting of the Russian Academy of Sciences. The views of enterprises on the quality of economic policy of federal and regional authorities have been presented. Estimates have been obtained that reflect the dynamics of investment activity of enterprises and the dynamics of investment financing from various sources, as well as the need of enterprises to modernize production. The opinions of enterprises about the desirable dynamics of the ruble exchange rate are given. The current situation with the provision of enterprises with human resources has been reflected. Enterprises’ answers to questions about whether they have territorially detached subdivisions and their use of outsourcing have been considered.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
FSSS of Russia. Information on the Socio-Economic Status of Russia–2017. http://www.gks.ru/bgd/free/B17_00/Main.htm.
A. A. Shirov, “From a crisis of financing mechanisms to sustainable economic growth,” Stud. Russ. Econ. Dev. 27 (4), 359–366 (2016).
V. V. Ivanter, “Strategy of transition to economic growth,” Stud. Russ. Econ. Dev. 27 (1), 1–4 (2016).
A. K. Moiseev, “Domestication of monetary policy,” Stud. Russ. Econ. Dev. 27 (3), 231–236 (2016).
Ya. N. Dubenetskii, “Economic mistakes and their consequences,” Stud. Russ. Econ. Dev. 27 (4), 374–381 (2016).
V. K. Fal’tsman, “Problems of structural, investment, and innovation policy in the crisis period,” Stud. Russ. Econ. Dev. 27 (4), 367–373 (2016).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Original Russian Text © D.B. Kuvalin, A.K. Moiseev, P.A. Lavrinenko, 2017.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kuvalin, D.B., Moiseev, A.K. & Lavrinenko, P.A. Russian enterprises in spring 2017: Slow restoration of investment activity against a background of economic stabilization. Stud. Russ. Econ. Dev. 28, 672–683 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075700717060065
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075700717060065