Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Problems of planning scientific and technological development at the national level

  • 45 Accesses

  • 2 Citations


The article analyzes problems of planning research and technological development. We consider two lines of theoretical concepts of planning, i.e., economic and mathematical versus empirical and evolutionary. Problems of the statistical basis for constructing economic and mathematical models of scientific and technological development are studied in detail. The example of Russia is used to show that the weakness of the theoretical framework of planning leads to inconsistencies in government priorities of scientific and technological development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. 1.

    B.-A. Lundvall, “National innovation systems — analytical concept and development tool,” Ind. Innov. 14(1), 95–119 (2007).

  2. 2.

    K. Arrow, “The economic implications of learning by doing,” Rev. Econ. Stud. 29(3), 155–173 (1962).

  3. 3.

    P. M. Romer, “Endogenous technological change,” J. Polit. Econ. 98(5), 71–102 (1990).

  4. 4.

    N. V. Suvorov and E. E. Balashova, “+ A modeling toolkit for predictive analytical studies of the dynamics of interindustry relations in the domestic economy,” Stud. Russ. Econ. Dev., 20(6), 590–599 (2009).

  5. 5.

    B. Lundvall, “Innovation As an interactive process: from user-producer interaction to the national innovation systems,” in Technology and Economic Theory, Ed. by G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, and L. Soete (Pinter, London, 1988).

  6. 6.

    H. Etzkowitz and L. Leydesdorff, “The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations,” Res. Pol. 29(2), 109–123 (2000).

  7. 7.

    L. M. Gokhberg, S. A. Zaichenko, G. A. Kitova, and T. E. Kuznetsova, Science Policy: the Global Context and the Russian Practice (NIU VShE, Moscow, 2011) [in Russian].

  8. 8.

    B. Godin,

  9. 9.

    B. Godin, “Measurement and statistics on science and technology:1920 to the present,” Publ. Underst. Sci. 9(1), 43–58 (2000)

  10. 10.

    M. A. Grueber,

  11. 11.

    S. Yu. Glaz’ev, The Theory of Long-Term Technical and Economic Development (VlaDar, Moscow, 1993) [in Russian].

  12. 12.

    V. A. Bessonov, N. Yu. Brodskii, S. V. Zhuravlev, A. G. Stolyarova, and A. S. Frolov, “On the development of the ICT sector in the Russian economy,” Vopr. Stat. No. 12 (2011).

  13. 13.

  14. 14.

  15. 15.

    Outlook for Energy in the World and Russia to up to 2035, Ed. by A.A. Makarova and L.G. Grigor’eva (INEI RAN, Moscow, 2012) [in Russian].

  16. 16.

    I. G. Dezhina, “By elevator, via a platform to a cluster,” Nezavisimaya Gazeta, Apr. 26 (2012).

  17. 17.

    Presidential Decree No. 899 as of July 7, 2011 “On approval of the priority directions of science and technology development in the Russian Federation and the list of critical technologies of the Russian Federation.”

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to A. S. Frolov.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © A.S. Frolov, 2014.

The article was based on the materials of the project of the RF Ministry of the Economy, Education, and Science “Scenario Analysis of the Long-Term Effects of the Scientific and Technological Development of Russia on the Macroeconomic Situation” (Agreement No. 02.CCC.21.0001), as well as under the HSE Program of Fundamental Research in 2014.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Frolov, A.S. Problems of planning scientific and technological development at the national level. Stud. Russ. Econ. Dev. 25, 586–596 (2014).

Download citation


  • RUSSIAN Economic Development
  • National Innovation System
  • Priority Direction
  • Planning Scientific
  • Empirical Concept