Abstract
2–3 nm Gd2O3 nanoparticles deposited on carbon nanoflakes were prepared. These are new contrast agents for photon-counting computed tomography based on detectors allowing counting of separate photons. Contrast agents of the Gd2O3@C core–shell structure were prepared by graphitization of the surface of these particles. The Gd2O3 and Gd2O3@C nanoparticles obtained, aqueous solution of Gd(NO3)3·6H2O, and a dispersion of 300–500 nm Gd2O3 particles in gelatin were studied by photon-counting computed tomography. At equal gadolinium concentrations, the highest X-ray absorption was noted for Gd(NO3)3·6H2O and Gd2O3, which is associated with higher density of these samples. Carbon in the contrast agents does not affect the absorption. An algorithm was developed for semiquantitative determination of gadolinium by photon-counting computed tomography.
REFERENCES
Gomes, M.J. and Jaseemudheen, M.M., J. Health Allied Sci., 2023, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 147–152. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1749180
Kim, J., Bar-Ness, D., Si-Mohamed, S., Coulon, P., Blevis, I., Douek, P., and Cormode, D.P., Sci. Rep., 2018, vol. 8, ID 12119. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-30570-y
Suslova, E.V., Kozlov, A.P., Shashurin, D.A., Rozhkov, V.A., Sotenskii, R.V., Maximov, S.V., Savilov, S.V., Medvedev, O.S., and Chelkov, G.A., Nanomaterials, 2022, vol. 12, ID 4110. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12234110
Suslova, E., Shashurin, D., Kozlov, A., Maximov, S., Rozhkov, V., Sotenskii, R., Savilov, S., Medvedev, O., and Chelkov, G., Funct. Mater. Lett., 2022, vol. 15, no. 7, ID 2250029. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793604722500291
Levine, D., McDonald, R.J., and Kressel, H.Y., JAMA, 2018, vol. 320, no. 18, pp. 1853–1854. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.13362
Russo, M., Ponsiglione, A.M., Forte, E., Netti, P.A., and Torino, E., Nanomedicine, 2017, vol. 12, no. 18, pp. 2199–2210. https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm-2017-0098
Morimoto, H., Minato, M., Nakagawa, T., Sato, M., Kobayashi, Y., Gonda, K., Takeda, M., Ohuchi, N., and Suzuki, N., J. Sol–Gel Sci. Technol., 2011, vol. 59, pp. 650–657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-011-2540-6
Fatima, A., Ahmad, M.W., Al Saidi, A.K.A., Choudhury, A., Chang, Y., and Lee, G.H., Nanomaterials, 2021, vol. 11, no. 9, ID 2449. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11092449
Bouzas-Ramos, D., Canga, K.C., Mayo, J.C., Sainz, R.M., Encinar, J.R., and Costa-Fernandez, J.M., Adv. Funct. Mater., 2019, vol. 29, ID 1903884. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201903884
Tian, G., Yin, W., Jin, J., Zhang, X., Xing, G., Li, S., Gu, Z., and Zhao, Y., J. Mater. Chem. B, 2014, vol. 2, pp. 1379–1389. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3TB21394C
Savilov, S.V., Strokova, N.E., Ivanov, A.S., Arkhipova, E.A., Desyatov, A.V., Hui, X., Aldoshin, S.M., and Lunin, V.V., Mater. Res. Bull., 2015, vol. 69, pp. 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2015.01.001
Stolbov, D.N., Chernyak, S.A., Maslakov, K.I., Kuznetsova, N.N., and Savilov, S.V., Russ. Chem. Bull., 2022, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 680–685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11172-022-3465-7
Kozlov, A., Suslova, E., Maksimov, S., Isaikina, O., Maslakov, K., Shashurin, D., Savilov, S., and Shelkov, G., Phys. Part. Nucl. Lett., 2023, vol. 20, pp. 1254–1258. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1547477123050473
Park, S.E., Kim, J.G., Hegazy, M.A.A., Cho, M.H., and Lee, S.Y., Proc. Medical Imaging 2014: Physics of Medical Imaging, Whiting, B.R. and Hoeschen, C., Eds., San-Diego, CA, USA: SPIE Medical Imaging, 2014, ID 90335N. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2043317
Kochubei, D.I. and Kanazhevskii, V.V., Khim. Inter. Ustoich. Razv., 2013, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 21–36. https://www.elibrary.ru/xqgfxn
Vatsyuk, A.V., Ingacheva, A.S., and Chukalina, M.V., Sens. Sist., 2018, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 83–91. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0235009218010122
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors are sincerely grateful to S.V. Maksimov and Cand. Sci. (Chem.) A.V. Shumyantsev for recording the TEM images and thermograms of the samples, respectively.
Funding
The study was financially supported by the Russian Science Foundation (project 22-15-00072) using the equipment purchased at the expense of the Program for the Development of the Moscow University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
D.A. Shashurin: development of the scheme of experimental studies, execution of tomographic experiments, data processing; E.V. Suslova: concept and idea of the study, synthesis and analysis of the physicochemical characteristics of the samples; V.A. Rozhkov and R.V. Sotenskii: tomographic experiments, data processing; O.S. Medvedev, G.A. Shelkov: administrative and organizational support of the study.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Translated from Zhurnal Prikladnoi Khimii, No. 4, pp. 337–344, August, 2023 https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044461823040023
Publisher's Note. Pleiades Publishing remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shashurin, D.A., Suslova, E.V., Rozhkov, V.A. et al. Gd2O3–Carbon Nanoflakes (CNFs) as Contrast Agents for Photon-Counting Computed Tomography (PCCT). Russ J Appl Chem 96, 410–416 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S107042722304002X
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S107042722304002X