Abstract
The biodegradation kinetics of such polysaccharide materials as microcrystalline cellulose, hydrated cellulose (viscose fiber), and native starch (reference sample) was studied. The biodegradation kinetics was evaluated by accumulation of carbon dioxide in the course of mineralization of organic substances under the action of soil microbiota (soil inoculum) using the Sturm test. The degrees of biodegradation of powdered fibrous cellulose and hydrated cellulose were found to be similar: 69.2 and 67.0% in 98 days. Microcrystalline cellulose appeared to be resistant to microbiological degradation (2.0% degradation), which is due to high stability of crystalline formations under the action of microbial metabolism products. After the biodegradation experiments, the strongly degrading cellulose samples had numerous structural defects, their color changed, and signs of the development of micromycetes were revealed. The absorption intensity in the regions corresponding to the O–H and C–O vibrations in the IR spectra decreased, which proves the degradation of polysaccharides. On the other hand, the intensity of the N–H vibration bands increased, which suggests accumulation of chitin, the main component of the cell walls of microscopic fungi fixed and sprouted on the sample surface. Biodegradation leads to a decrease in the molecular mass of powdered cellulose and hydrated cellulose samples, which is confirmed by a decrease in the temperature of thermal oxidative degradation.
REFERENCES
Chmolowska, D., Hamda, N., and Laskowski, R., J. Soils Sediments, 2017, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 299–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-016-1536-9
Bayer, E.A., Shoham, Y., and Lamed, R., in The Prokaryotes, Dworkin, M., Falkow, S., Rosenberg, E., Schleifer, K.-H., and Stackebrandt, E., Eds., New York: Springer, 2006, pp. 578–617. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-30742-7_19
Mastalygina, E.E., Pantyukhov, P.V., and Popov, A.A., IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng., 2018, vol. 369, no. 1, ID 012044. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/369/1/012044
Zambrano, M.C., Pawlak, J.J., Daystar, J., Ankeny, M., Goller, C.C., and Venditti, R.A., Mar. Pollut. Bull., 2020, vol. 151, ID 110826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.110826
Van Der Zee, M., Stolrrjesdijk, J.H., Feil, H., and Feijen, J., Chemosphere, 1998, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 461–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0045-6535(97)10017-0
Erdal, N.B. and Hakkarainen, M., Biomacromolecules, 2022, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 2713–2729. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.2c00336
Shabarin, A.A., Kuz’min, A.M., Matyushkina, Yu.I., and Shabarin, I.A., Khim. Rast. Syr’ya, 2022, no. 2, pp. 307–314. https://doi.org/10.14258/jcprm.2022029532
Zykova, A.K., Pantyukhov, P.V., Mastalygina, E.E., Chaverri-Ramos, C., Nikolaeva, S.G., Saavedra-Arias, J.J., Popov, A.A., Wortman, S.E., and Poletto, M., Polymers, 2021, vol. 13, no. 13, ID 2138. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13132138
Gamage, A., Liyanapathiranage, A., Manamperi, A., Gunathilake, C., Mani, S., Merah, O., and Madhujith, T., Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, no. 10, ID 6085. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106085
Rizkiansyah, R.R., Mardiyati, S., and Suratman, R., AIP Conf. Proc., 2016, vol. 1725, ID 020071. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4945525
Moon, R.J., Martini, A., Nairn, J., Simonsen, J., and Youngblood, J., Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 3941–3994. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cs00108b
Kennedy, J.F. and Knill, C.J., in Medical Textiles and Biomaterials for Healthcare, Sawston: Woodhead, 2006, pp. 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1533/9781845694104.1.3
Jedvert, K. and Heinze, T., J. Polym. Eng., 2017, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 845–860. https://doi.org/10.1515/polyeng-2016-0272.
Sun, S., Sun, S., Cao, X., and Sun, R., Bioresource Technol., 2016, vol. 199, pp. 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.08.061
Watcharakul, S., Umsakul, K., Hodgson, B., Chumeka, W., and Tanrattanakul, V., Electron. J. Biotechnol., 2012, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 0. https://doi.org/10.2225/vol15-issue1-fulltext-10
Varshney, S., Sain, A., Gupta, D., and Sharma, S., Indian J. Microbiol., 2021, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 31–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-020-00903-5
Lynd, L.R., Weimer, P.J., van Zyl, W.H., and Pretorius, I.S., Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., 2002, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 506–577. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.66.3.506-577.2002
Kumirska, J., Czerwicka, M., Kaczyński, Z., Bychowska, A., Brzozowski, K., Thöming, J., and Stepnowski, P., Mar. Drugs, 2010, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 1567–1636. https://doi.org/10.3390/md8051567
Nikonenko, N.A., Buslov, D.K., Sushko, N.I., and Zhbankov, R.G., Biopolymers, 2000, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 257–262. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0282(2000)57:4<257::AID-BIP7>3.0.CO;2-3
Yang, H., Yan, R., Chen, H., Lee, D.H., and Zheng, C., Fuel, 2007, vol. 86, nos. 12–13, pp. 1781–1788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2006.12.013
Veeramachineni, A.K., Sathasivam, T., Muniyandy, S., Janarthanan, P., Langford, S.J., and Yan, L.Y., Appl. Sci., 2016, vol. 6, no. 6, ID 170. https://doi.org/10.3390/app6060170
Yeng, L.C., Wahit, M.U., and Othman, N., J. Teknol., 2015, vol. 75, no. 11, pp. 107–112. https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v75.5338
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The studies were performed using the equipment of the Center for Shared Use at the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
E.E. Mastalygina: studies by optical microscopy and Fourier IR spectroscopy; Z.R. Abushakhmanova: studies by Fourier IR spectroscopy; S.D. Brovina: studies by thermal gravimetric analysis; M.Yu. Guivan: studies by optical microscopy, determination of the size and structural parameters: V.A. Ovchinnikov and P.V. Pantyukhov: Sturm tests.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Translated from Zhurnal Prikladnoi Khimii, Nos. 11–12, pp. 1448–1458, August, 2022 https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044461822110093
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mastalygina, E.E., Abushakhmanova, Z.R., Guyvan, M.Y. et al. A Study of Biodegradation Kinetics of Cellulose and Its Derivatives Using of the Sturm Test. Russ J Appl Chem 95, 1790–1799 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070427222120059
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070427222120059