Abstract
Activated carbon loaded hexaethylphosphoroustriamide (HEPT) copper chloride catalyst was prepared by the impregnation method. The catalytic performance of this catalyst was tested in the acetylene hydrochlorination reaction and compared with that of the activated carbon loaded copper chloride catalyst. At the condition of 140°C, volume space-time velocity of C2H2 on unit mass catalyst of 50 h−1, molar ratio of HCl to C2H2 of 1.05:1 and real copper loading (w) of 12.85%, C2H2 conversion of 90.17% and vinyl chloride selectivity of 95.47% were achieved. Under the same reaction conditions, its catalytic performance is better than that of the activated carbon supported copper chloride catalyst. Through X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscope with energy dispersive X-ray (SEM-EDX), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), temperature-programmed desorption (TPD), infrared spectroscopy (IR), inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) characterization methods, it can be confirmed that the catalyst with HEPT has stronger adsorption capacity of hydrogen chloride, which can reduce the reduction of Cu2+ species, which is responsible for the enhancement of the catalytic performance.
REFERENCES
Shen, Z., Zhao, H., Liu, Yu., et al., Reaction Chemistry and Engineering, 2018, vol. 3, pp. 34–40. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RE00201G
Chao, S., Zou, F., Wan, F., et al., Scientific Reports, 2017, vol. 7, pp. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep39789
Zhao, J., Gu, S., Xu, X., et al., Catalysis Science and Technology, 2016, vol. 6, pp. 3263–3270. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CY02045J
Wang, S., Shen, B., and Song., Q., Catalysis Letters, 2010, vol. 134, pp. 102–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-009-0216-4
Zhang, H., Dai, B., Wang, X., et al., Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 2012, vol. 18, pp. 49–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2011.11.075
Han, Y., Zhang, H., Li, Yu, et al., Catalysis Today, 2020, vol. 355, pp. 205–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2019.03.042
Zhang, H., Li, W., Jin, Y., et al., Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2016, vol. 189, pp. 56–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.02.030
Jin, Y., Li, G., Zhang, J., et al., RSC Advances, 2015, vol. 5, pp. 37774–37779. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA03466C
Shang, S., Zhao, W., Wang, Y., et al., Acs Catalysis, 2017, vol. 7, pp. 3510–3520. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.7b00057
Li, Yu, Dong, Y., Li, W., et al., Molecular Catalysis, 2017, vol. 443, pp. 220–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcat.2017.09.021
Li, H., Wang, F., Cai, W., et al., Catalysis Science and Technology, 2015, vol. 5, pp. 5174–5184. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5cy00751h
Hu, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, Y., et al., Applied Catalysis A: General, 2020, vol. 591, pp. 117408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2020.117408
Kursheva, L., Kataeva, O., Krivolapov, D., et al., Heteroatom Chemistry, 2008, vol. 19, pp. 483–489. https://doi.org/10.1002/hc.20459
Sassu, G., Zilio-Grandi, F., and Conte, A., Journal of Chromatography A, 1968, vol. 34, pp. 394–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9673(68)80074-3
Froböse, E., and Löwe, A., Chemical Engineering Technology, 1998, vol. 21, pp. 175–178. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1521-4125(199802)21:2<175::aid-ceat175>3.0.co;2-t
Li, Li, Zhu, Zh., Yan, C., et al., Applied Catalysis A: General, 2007, vol. 320, pp. 166–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2007.01.029
Wuo, Y., Ma, Y., Li, Q., et al., Canadian Journal of Chemistry, 2021, vol. , 99, pp. 812–820. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjc-2020-0378
Yang, Y., Zhao, Ch., Qiao, X., et al., Green Energy and Environment, 2022, vol. 1, p. 6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gee.2022.01.006
Zhang, H., Dai, B., Li, W., et al., Journal of Catalysis, 2014, vol. 316, pp. 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2014.05.005
Liu, Y., Zhao, L., Zhang, Y., et al., Catalysts, 2020, vol. 10, p. 1218. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10101218
Bedenko, S., Dement’ev, K., and Maximov, K., Neftekhimiya, 2022, vol. 62, p. 6. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965544122090031,
Yan, Wang, Yao, Nian, Jinli, Zhang, et al., Molecular Catalysis, 2019, vol. 479, p. 110612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcat.2019.110612
Li, H., Cheng, R., Liu, Z., et al., Science of The Total Environment, 2019, vol. 683, pp. 638–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.242
Faheem, M., Jiang, X., Wang, L., et al., Rsc Advances, 2018, vol. 8, pp. 5740–5748. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA13608K
Han, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, Y., et al., Applied Organometallic Chemistry, 2021, vol. 35, p. e6066. https://doi.org/10.1002/aoc.6066
Funding
We would like to acknowledge the financial supports for this work provided by Liaoning Provincial Department of Education (No. LJKMZ 20220764), Liaoning BaiQianWan Talents Program (2020B085), Liaoning Provincial Science and Technology Department, Applied Basic Research Program Project (2023JH2/101300006).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, L., Zhang, J. & Zhang, Y. Activated Carbon Loaded Hexaethylphosphoroustriamide Copper Chloride Catalyzed Acetylene Hydrochlorination Reaction. Russ J Appl Chem 95, 1738–1747 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070427222110088
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070427222110088