Abstract
Behavior of the sulfide NiMo catalyst on an alumina support containing SAPO—11 silicoaluminophosphate (NiMo/SAP-Al2O3) in the hydroprocessing of a mixture of a straight run gas oil (SRGO) and rapeseed oil (RO) was studied under a pressure of 5.0 MPa and liquid hourly space velocity of 1.5 h−1. The effect of temperature on the properties of the products produced in the hydroprocessing of a mixture with 30 wt % RO and 70 wt % SRGO in the presence of the NiMo/SAP-Al2O3 catalyst and a double-bed catalytic system containing layer-by-layer loaded Mo/Al2O3 and NiMo/SAP-Al2O3 sulfide catalysts. It was found that the experimental conditions provide a full conversion of oxygen-containing compounds and reduction of the content of sulfur to less than 10 mg kg−1. Raising the temperature from 330 to 380°C leads to an increase in the conversion of alkanes formed due to the hydrodeoxygenation of rapeseed oil and to lowering of the cloud point of the hydroprocessing products by approximately 15°. Possible reasons for the differences in behavior between the systems under study: a high conversion of C17, C18 alkanes is reached in the presence of the NiMo/SAP-Al2O3 catalyst, whereas the double layer Mo/Al2O3 + NiMo/SAP-Al2O3 system provides a more effective course of the reactions in which aromatic hydrocarbons are hydrogenated.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fivga, A., Speranza, L.G., Branco, C.M., Ouadi, M., and Hornung, A., AIMS Energy, 2019, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 46–76. https://doi.org/10.3934/energy.2019.1.46
Mittelbach, M., Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol., 2015, vol. 117, no. 11, pp. 1832–1846. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejlt.201500125
Yakovlev, V.A., Khromova, S.A., and Bukhtiyarov, V.I., Russ. Chem. Rev., 2011, vol. 80, no. 10, pp. 911–925. https://doi.org/10.1070/RC2011v080n10ABEH004182
Al-Sabawi, M. and Chen, J.W., Energy Fuels, 2012, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 5373–5399. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef3006405
van Dyk, S., Su, J., McMillan, J.D., and Saddler, J., Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefin., 2019, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 760–775. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1974
Bezergianni, S., Dimitriadis, A., Kikhtyanin, O., and Kubicka, D., Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., vol. 68, pp. 29–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2018.04.002
Toth, C., Sagi, D., and Hancsok, J., J. Cleaner Prod., 2016, vol. 111, pp. 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.152
Vlasova, E.N., Delii, I.V., Nuzhdin, A.L., Aleksandrov, P.V., Gerasimov, E.Yu., Aleshina, G.I., and Bukhtiyarova, G.A., Kinet. Catal., 2014, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 480–490. https://doi.org/10.1134/s0023158414040144
Nikul’shin, P.A., Sal’nikov, V.A., Pimerzin, A.A., Eremina, Y.V., Koklyukhin, A.S., Tsvetkov, V.S., and Pimerzin, A.A., Petrol. Chem., 2016, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 56–61. https://doi.org/10.1134/s0965544115080150
Bezergianni, S., Dimitriadis, A., and Meletidis, G., Fuel, 2014, vol. 125, pp. 129–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2014.02.010
Vlasova, E.N., Deliy, I.V., Gerasimov, E.Yu., Aleksandrov, P.V., Nuzhdin, A.L., Aleshina, G.I., and Bukhtiyarova, G.A., Petrol. Chem., 2017, vol. 57, no. 12, pp. 1156–1160. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965544117060263
Kubička, D. and Kaluža, L., Appl. Catal., A, 2010, vol. 372, pp. 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2009.10.034
Donnis, B., Egeberg, R.G., Blom, P., and Knudsen, K.G., Top. Catal., 2009, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 229–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11244-008-9159-z
Satyarthi, J.K., Chiranjeevi, T., Gokak, D.T., and Viswa-Nathan, P.S., Catal. Sci. Technol., 2013, vol. 3, pp. 70–80. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cy20415k
Stanislaus, A., Marafi, A., and Rana, M., Catal. Today, 2010, vol. 153, nos. 1–2, pp. 1–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2010.05.011
de Brimont, M.R., Dupont, C., Daudin, A., Geantet, C., and Raybaud, P., J. Catal., 2012, vol. 286, pp. 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2011.10.022
Dupont, C., Lemeur, R., Daudin, A., and Raybaud, P., J. Catal., 2011, vol. 279, no. 2, pp. 276–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2011.01.025
Deliy, I.V., Vlasova, E.N., Nuzhdin, A.L., Gerasimov, E.Yu., and Bukhtiyarova, G.A., RSC Adv., 2014, vol. 4, pp. 2242–2250. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ra46164e
Simacek, P., Kubicka, D., Kubickova, I., Homola, F., Pospasil, M., and Chudoba, J., Fuel, 2011, vol. 90, pp. 2473–2479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2011.03.013
Rana, B.S., Kumar, R., Tiwari, R., Joshi, R.K., Garg, M.O., and Sinha, A.K., Biomass Bioenergy, 2013, vol. 56, pp. 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.04.029
Kumar, R., Rana, B.S., Tiwari, R., Verma, D., Kumar, R., Joshi, R.K., Garg, M.O., and Sinha, A.K., Green Chem., 2010, vol. 12, pp. 2232–2239. https://doi.org/10.1039/C0GC00204F
Sankaranarayanan, T.M., Banu, M., Pandurangan, A., and Sivasanker, S., Bioresour. Technol., 2011, vol. 102, no. 22, pp. 10717–10723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.08.127
Zhang, X., Guo, A., Wang, F., and Duang, X., Energy Fuels, 2010, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 3772–3777. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef901373w
Xing, G.H., Liu, S.Y., Guan, Q.X., and Li, W., Catal. Today, 2019, vol. 330, pp. 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2018.04.028
Li, T., Cheng, J., Huang, R., Yang, W., Zhou, J., and Cen, K., Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2016, vol. 41, no. 47, pp. 21883–21887. https://doi.org/10.1016/jijhydene.2016.09.013
Liu, Q., Zuo, H., Zhang, Q., Wang, T., and Ma, L., Chin. J. Catal., 2014, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 748–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-2067(12)60710-4
Verma, D., Rana, B.S., Kumar, R., Sibi, M.G., and Sinha, A.K., Appl. Catal., A, 2015, vol. 490, pp. 108–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2014.11.007
Nuzhdin, A.L., Bukhtiyarova, G.A., Porsin, A.A., Prosvirin, I.P., Deliy, I.V., Volodin, V.A., Gerasimov, E.Y., Vlasova, E.N., and Bukhtiyarov, V.I., Catalysts, 2019, vol. 9, p. 96. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal9010096
Anand, M., Farooqui, S.A., Kumar, R., Joshi, R., Kumar, R., Sibi, M.G., Singh, H., and Sinha, A.K., Fuel Process. Technol., 2016, vol. 151, pp. 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2016.05.028
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to E.Yu. Gerasimov for a TEM analysis of samples of the sulfide catalysts. The study was carried out on the equipment of the Collective Use Center “National center of research into catalysts.”
Funding
The study was financially supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation, project no. 14.575.21.0128, unique project identifier RFMEFI57517X0128.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The authors state that they have no conflict of interest to be disclosed in the present communication.
Additional information
Russian Text © The Author(s), 2019, published in Zhurnal Prikladnoi Khimii, 2019, Vol. 92, No. 13, pp. 1723–1731.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Porsin, A.A., Vlasova, E.N., Nuzhdin, A.L. et al. Co-Processing of Straight Run Gas Oil-Rapeseed Oil Mixture Using Sulfide NiMo Catalyst on Zeolite-Containing Support. Russ J Appl Chem 92, 1797–1804 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070427219120228
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070427219120228