Abstract
The rheological properties of starch-latex blends mechanically activated in a rotary-pulse apparatus were studied. Several integral criteria—flexibility, polarity and hydrophilicity of macromolecules, particle size and electrokinetic potential—were chosen to evaluate the effectiveness of starch modification with synthetic copolymer latexes. An increase in the blends viscosity was shown to observe for more flexible polymers Binder RA, Binder AF, Ruzin with a glass transition temperature (Tg) below 25°C. Polymers BAK-R and Aquapol with high values of the modulus E′ reduce viscosity. The hydrophilicity of synthetic copolymers and their particle size promote an increase in the blends viscosity.
REFERENCES
Ahmed, T., Shahid, M., Azeem, F., Rasul, I., Shah, A.A., Noman, M., Hameed, A., Manzoor, N., Manzoor, I., and Muhammad, S., Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 2018, vol. 25, pp. 7287–7298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1234-9
Jayasekara, R., Harding, I.H., Bowater, I., and Lonergan, G., J. Polym. Environ., 2005, vol. 13, pp. 231–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-005-4758-2
Leja, K. and Lewandowicz, G., Pol. J. Environ. Stud., 2010, vol. 19, pp. 255–266.
Carvalho, A.J.F. in Monomers, Polymers and Composites from Renewable Resources, Belgacem, M.N. and Gandini, A., Eds., Elsevier: Science, 2008, pp. 321–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-045316-3.00015-6
Gandini, A., Lacerda, T.M., Carvalho, A.J., and Trovatti, E., Chem. Rev., 2016, vol. 116, pp. 1637–1669. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00264
Yu, L., Dean, K., and Li, L., Prog. Polym. Sci., 2006, vol. 31, pp. 576–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2006.03.002
Siracusa, V., Rocculi, P., Romani, S., and Rosa, M.D., Trends Food Sci. Technol., 2008, vol. 19, pp. 634–643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2008.07.003
Tharanathan, R.N., Trends Food Sci. Technol., 2003, vol. 14, pp. 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-2244(02)00280-7
Lipatova, I.M., Losev, N.V., Makarova, L.I., Rodicheva, J.A., and Burmistrov, V.A., Carbohydr. Polym., 2020, vol. 239, p. 116245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116245
Burmistrov, V.A., Lipatova, I.M., Tifonova, I.P., Losev, N.V., Rodicheva, J.A., and Koifman, O.I., Mater. Lett., 2022, p. 132502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2022.132502
Tabasum, S., Younas, M., Zaeem, M.A., Majeed, I., Majeed, M., Noreen, A., Iqbal, M.N., and Zia, K.M., Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 2019, vol. 122, pp. 969–996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.10.092
Kalambur, S. and Rizvi, S.S.H., J. Plast. Film Sheet, 2006, vol. 22, pp. 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756087906062729
Averous, L., J. Macromol. Sci., Part C: Polym. Rev., 2004, vol. 44, pp. 231–274. https://doi.org/10.1081/MC-200029326
Kalambur, S. and Rizvi, S.S.H., J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2005, vol. 96, no. 4, pp. 1072–1082. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.21504
Zhu, J., Li, L., Chen, L., and Li, X., Food Hydroloc., 2012, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 116–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2012.02.004
Chen, P., Yu, L., Simon, G.P., Liu, X., Dean, K., and Chen, L., Carbohydr. Polym., 2011, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 1975–1983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.11.001
Chen, X., Du, X., Chen, P., Guo, L., Xu, Y., and Zhou, X., Carbohydr. Polym., 2017, vol. 157, pp. 637–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.10.024
Fernga, L.-H., Chen, S.-H., and Lin, Y.-A., Procedia Food Sci., 2011, vol. 1, pp. 1295–1300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profoo.2011.09.192
Pareta, R. and Edirisinghe, M.J., Carbohydr. Polym., 2006, vol. 63, pp. 425–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.09.018
Zuo, Y.Y.J., Hebraud, P., Hemar, Y., and Ashokkumar, M., Ultrason. Sonochem., 2012, vol. 19, pp. 421–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2011.08.006
Augustin, M.A., Sanguansri, P., and Htoon, A., Food Sci. Emerg. Technol., 2008, vol. 9, pp. 224–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2007.11.003
Jimenez, A., Fabra, M.J., Talens, P., and Chiralt, A., Carbohydr. Polym., 2012, vol. 89, pp. 676–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.03.075
Zhang, J., Xu, S., and Li, W., Chem. Eng. Process, 2012, vols. 57–58, pp. 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2012.04.004
Patil, P.N., Gogate, P.R., Csoka, L., Dregelyi-Kiss, A., and Horvath, M., Ultrason. Sonochem., 2016, vol. 30, pp. 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2015.11.009
Scholz, P. and Keck, C.M., Int. J. Pharm., 2015, vol. 482, pp. 110–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.12.040
Hall, S., Cooke, M., El-Hamouz, A., and Kowalski, A.J., Chem. Eng. Sci., 2011, vol. 66, pp. 2068–2079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2011.01.054
Losev, N.V. and Lipatova, I.M., Russ. J. Gen. Chem., 2018, vol. 88, pp. 356–361. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070363218020287
Promtov, M., Stepanov, A., Aleshin, A., and Kolesnikova, M., Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 2016, vol. 108, pp. 217–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2016.03.013
Bałdyga, J., Makowski, Ł., Orciuch, W., Sauter, C., and Schuchmann, H.P., Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 2008, vol. 86, pp. 1369–1381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2008.08.016
Cano, A.I., Chafer, M., Chiralt, A., and GonzalezMartinez, C., J. Food Eng., 2015, vol. 167, pp. 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2015.06.003
Losev, N.V. and Lipatova, I.M., Russ. J. Appl. Chem., 2010, vol. 83, pp. 1309–1313. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070427210070268
Rodgers, T.L. and Cooke, M., Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 2012, vol. 90, pp. 323–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2011.07.018
Badve, M.P., Alpar, T., Pandit, A.B., Gogate, P.R., and Csoka, L., Ultrason. Sonochem., 2015, vol. 22, pp. 272– 277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2014.05.017
Burmistrov, V.A., Lipatova, I.M., Rodicheva, J.A., Losev, N.V., Trifonova, I.P., and Koifman, O.I., Eur. Polym. J., 2019, vol. 120, p. 109209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.08.036
Malkin, A.Ya. and Isayev, A.I., Rheology. Concept, Methods, and Applications, Toronto: ChemTech Publishing, 2017, 3 ed.
Loginova, M.E., Movsumzade, E.M., Chetvertneva, I.A., and Shammazov, A.M., Ross. Khim. Zh., 2022, vol. LXVI, no. 3, pp. 50–55. https://doi.org/10.6060/rcj.2022663.7
Kirsanov, E.A. and Matveenko, V.N., Non-Newtonian behavior of Structured Systems, Moscow: TECHNOSPHERE, 2016.
Funding
The work was carried out under government contracts (study of modifiers (Subject No. FZZW-2023-0009), study of rheology (Subject No. 01201260484)). The size and electrokinetic potential were determined using the equipment of the Center for Collective Use “Upper Volga Regional Center for Physical and Chemical Research.” Dynamic mechanical analysis was performed using the resources of the Center for the Collective Use of Scientific Equipment of the ISUCT (with the support of the Russian Ministry of Education and Science, agreement no. 075-15-2021-671).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Trifonova, I.P., Burmistrov, V.A., Losev, N.V. et al. Features of the Rheological Behavior of Starch Hydrogels Modified with Synthetic Latexes. Russ J Gen Chem 93, 1591–1598 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070363223060336
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070363223060336