Abstract
The chemical reactivity of caffeine in aqueous medium at different pH in the bromination reaction was quantitatively assessed from experimental investigations of kinetic evidences, reduction propensity estimations employing hydrodynamic voltammetry and in silico evaluations of dipole moments. The reaction at each of these pH was studied at five different temperatures whereby specific rates, energies of activation and entropy activation values were determined. Further, the variation in the nucleophilicity of caffeine at these pH values was estimated in terms of its reduction propensity from voltammograms. The outcome of these data complemented by in silico evaluations of dipole moments, quantitatively assessed in unison the chemical reactivity of caffeine at acidic, neutral and basic medium. The increase in the specific rates of bromination of caffeine was seen to proportionately accompany the increase in the nucleophilicity of caffeine and decrease in dipole moments. The aqueous uncatalysed bromination of caffeine was found to be a rapid second order electrophilic substitution reaction and studies herein provided an insight into the mechanism of the reaction at different pH. The study necessitated significantly low concentrations of the reactants in the benign solvent water for kinetic measurements that consequently bolstered green chemistry principles in this research.
REFERENCES
Janitschke, D., Lauer, A.A., and Bachmann, C.M., Int. J. Mol. Sci., 2020, vol. 21, no. 23, p. 9015. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21239015
Tavagnacco, L., Corucci, G., and Gerelli, Y., J. Phys. Chem., 2021, vol. 125, no. 36, p. 10174. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.1c04360
Terekhova, I.V., Kumeev, R.S., and Al’per, G.A., Russ. J. Phys., 2007, vol. 81, p. 1071. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036024407070114
Skornyakov, Yu.V., Lozinskaya, N.A., Proskurnina, M.V., and Zefirov, N.S., Russ. J. Org. Chem., 2005, vol. 41, no. 5, p. 689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11178-005-0227-6
Avdeenko, A.P., Konovalova, S.A., and Shishkina, S.V., Russ. J. Org. Chem., 2021, vol. 57, p. 38. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070428021010061
Borodkin, G.I.. and Shubin, V.G., Russ. J. Org. Chem., 2021, vol. 57, p. 1369. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070428021090013
Yambulatov, D.S., Nikolaevskii, S.A., Lutsenko, I.A., Kiskin, M.A., Shmelev, M.A., Bekker, O.B., Efimov, N.N., Ugolkova, E.A., Minin, V.V., Sidorov, A.A., and Eremenko, I.L., Russ. J. Coord. Chem., 2020, vol. 46, p. 772. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070328420110093
Berliner, E., J. Chem. Edu., 1966, vol. 43, no. 3, p. 124. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed043p124
Rao, T.S., Mali, S.I., and Dangat, V.T., Tetrahedron, 1978, vol. 34, p. 205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-4020(01)93605-1
Bonde, S.L., Dangat, V.T., Bhadane, R.P., and Joshi, V.S., Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 2013, vol. 45, no. 6, p. 355. https://doi.org/10.1002/kin.20770
Srinivasan, C. and Chellamani, A., React. Kinet. Catal. Lett., 1982, vol. 18, p. 187. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02065161
Borkar, V.T., Bonde, S.L., and Dangat, V.T., Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 2013, vol. 45, p. 693. https://doi.org/10.1002/kin.20801
Borkar, V.T., Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 2021, vol. 53, no. 4, p. 504. https://doi.org/10.1002/kin.21460
Borkar, V.T., Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 2021, vol. 53, no. 11, p. 1193. https://doi.org/10.1002/kin.21525
Saikia, I., Borah, A.J., and Phukan, P., Chem. Rev., 2016, vol. 116, no. 12, p. 6837. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00400
King, A.O., Okukado, N., and Negishi, E., J. Chem. Soc., 1977, vol. 19, p. 683.
Sonogashira, K., J. Organomet. Chem., 2002, vol. 653, nos. 1–2, p. 46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-328X
Tamao, K., Sumitani, K., and Kumada, M., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1972, vol. 94, no. 12, p. 4374. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00767a075
Suzuki, A., Pure Appl. Chem., 1991, vol. 63, no. 3, p. 419. https://doi.org/10.1351/pac199163030419
Urgaonkar, S. and Verkade, J.G., J. Org. Chem., 2004, vol. 69, no. 26, p. 9135. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo048716q
Lieberman, A.N. and Goldstein, M., Pharmacol. Rev., 1985, vol. 37, no. 2, p. 217.
Smirnova, I.S., Suslov, A.V., and Noskin, L.A., Radiobiol., 1983, vol. 23, no. 5, p. 653.
Vartanian, L.P., Rudenko, and Volchkov, V.A., Med. Radiol., 1989, vol. 34, no. 11, p. 82.
Bakkenist, A.R., de Boer, J.E., Plat, H., and Wever, R., Biochem. Biophys. Acta., 1980, vol. 613, no. 2, p. 337. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-2744
Beckwith, R.C., Wang, T.X., and Margerum, D.W., Inorg. Chem., 1996, vol. 35, no. 4, p. 995. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic950909w
Kauffman, G.B., J. Chem. Edu., 1988, vol. 65, no. 1, p. 28. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed065p28
Borkar, V.T., J. Chem. Edu., 2021, vol. 98, no. 9, p. 2959. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00185
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors acknowledge the Management of Modern Education Society’s Nowrosjee Wadia College, Pune for facilitating this work in the laboratories of the Department of Chemistry. The authors are thankful to Dr. T.S. Rao (Department of Chemistry, University of Pune) and Dr. V.T. Dangat (Department of Chemistry, Nowrosjee Wadia College, Pune) for their helpful discussions during this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maske, P.D., Borkar, V.T. & Latpate, S.S. A Novel Quantitative Insight into the Chemical Reactivity of Caffeine in Acidic, Neutral and Basic Medium in an Electrophilic Substitution Reaction. Russ J Gen Chem 93, 429–439 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070363223020263
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070363223020263