Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Estimation of octane rating of hydrocarbon homologs using logistic regression

  • Published:
Russian Journal of General Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Octane rating of hydrocarbons from engine fuels have been determined using the four-parametric logistic regression. Regression equations have been constructed for homologous groups, carbon atoms number being the independent variable. The method accuracy is no worse than that of experimental methods of octane rating determination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Karapet’yants, M.H., Metody sravnitel’nogo rascheta fiziko-khimicheskikh svoistv (Methods of Comparative Calculation of Physico-Chemical Properties), Moscow: Khimiya, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Denisov, E.T., Kinetika gomogennykh reaktsii (Kinetics of Homogeneous Reactions), Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gushhina, S.V., Kosman, V.M., and Zenkevich, I.G., Vestn. S.-Peterburg. Gos. Univ., Ser. Fiz.-Khim., 2009, no. 1, p. 96.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Viazmin, S.Yu., Marinichev, A.N., and Domnin, I.N., Russ. J. Appl. Chem., 2005, vol. 78, no. 10, p. 1662. DOI: 1070-4272/05/7810-1662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Vasil’ev, N.P. and Egorov, A.A., Matem. Biol. Bioinform., 2011, vol. 6, no. 2, p. 190.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Marinichev, A.N., Morozova, T.E., and Zenkevich, I.G., Usp. Sovr. Estestvozn., 2013, no. 11, p. 152.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gureev, A.A., Seregin, E.P., and Azev, V.S., Kvalifikatsionnye metody ispytaniya neftyanykh topliv: Spravochnik (Qualification Test Methods of Petroleum Fuels: Handbook), Moscow: Khimiya, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Khimicheskaya entsiklopediya (Chemical Encyclopedia), Knunyants, I.L., Ed., Moscow: Bol’shaya Sovetskaya Entsiklopediya, 1992, vol. 3, p. 367.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chemometrics Application Note N 11-6, Infometrix Inc.: Bothell, WA. 1993.

  10. Cao, D., Tan, J., Chen, Hu, and Han, S., Guang Pu., 1999, vol. 19, no. 3, p. 314.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chung, H., Lee, H., and Jun, C.-H., Bull. Korean Chem. Soc., 2001, vol. 22, no. 1, p. 37.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Meusinger, R. and Moros, R., Chemometr. Intel. Lab. Syst., 1999, vol. 46, no. 1, p. 67. DOI: 0169-7439/99/$.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Meusinger, R. and Moros, R., Fuel, 2001, vol. 80, p. 613. DOI: 0016-2361/01/$.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Anderson, P.C., Sharkey, J.M., and Walsh, R.P., J. Instr. Petrol., 1972, vol. 59, p. 83.

    Google Scholar 

  15. van Leeuwen, J.A., Jonker, R.J., and Gill, R., Chemometr. Intel. Lab. Syst., 1994, vol. 25, no. 2, p. 325. DOI: 0169-7439/94/$07.00.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nikolaou, N., Papadopoulos, C.E., Gadlias, I.A., and Pitarakis, K.G., Fuel, 2004, vol. 83, no. 4, p. 517. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel., 2003.09.011.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ghosh, P., Hickey, J.H., and Jaffe, S.B., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2006, vol. 45, p. 337. DOI: 10.1021/ie050811h.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Murty, B.S.N. and Rao, R.N., Fuel Proc. Technol., 2004, vol. 85, p. 1595. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2003.08.004.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hosoya, H., Croatica Chem. Acta., 2002, vol. 75, no. 2, p. 433.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Albahri, T.A., Fuel Chem. Div. Preprints, 2002, vol. 47, no. 2, p. 531.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Albahri, T.A., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2003, vol. 42, p. 657. DOI: 10.1021/ie020306+.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Perdih, A. and Perdih, F., Acta Chim. Slov., 2006, vol. 53, p. 306.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zenkevich, I.G., Russ. J. Struct. Chem., 2007, vol. 48, no. 6, p. 1006. DOI: 10.1007/s10947-007-0164-z.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Zenkevich, I.G., J. Chemometr., 2010, vol. 24, p. 158. DOI: 10.1002/cem.1297.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zenkevich, I.G., Chromatography, 2012, no. 75, p. 767. DOI: 10.1007/s10337-012-2260-2.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Marinichev, A.N., Russ. J. Appl. Chem., 2007, vol. 80, no. 2, p. 209. DOI: 10.1134/s1070427207020085.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Do, P.T.M., Crossley, S., Santikunaporu, M., and Resasco, D., Catalysis, 2007, vol. 20, p. 33. DOI: 10.1039/b602366p.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. http://www.astm.org/Standards/D2598.htm (June, 2014).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. St. Petersburg State University, Universitetskii pr. 26, St. Petersburg, 198504, Russia

    I. G. Zenkevich & A. N. Marinichev

Authors
  1. I. G. Zenkevich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. N. Marinichev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. G. Zenkevich.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © I.G. Zenkevich, A.N. Marinichev, 2014, published in Zhurnal Obshchei Khimii, 2014, Vol. 84, No. 11, pp. 1767–1773.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zenkevich, I.G., Marinichev, A.N. Estimation of octane rating of hydrocarbon homologs using logistic regression. Russ J Gen Chem 84, 2066–2072 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070363214110024

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070363214110024

Keywords

Search

Navigation