Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Paleomagnetism and Cyclostratigraphy of the Permian-Triassic Boundary Interval of the Staroe Slukino Section, Vladimir Region

  • Published:
Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract—The paper presents the results of paleomagnetic, rock magnetic, and cyclostratigraphic studies of continental red beds that compose the Permian-Triassic boundary interval of the Staroe Slukino section in the Vladimir Region, Russia. Based on the directions of the characteristic components of the natural remanent magnetization of the studied rocks in the sampled stratum, the intervals of normal and reversed polarity related to the regional magnetozones r2RnP, r3RnP, and N3P-T were identified. Within the r3RnP zone, there is an interval of anomalous paleomagnetic directions, which has similar characteristics to those identified earlier in the coeval intervals of the Nedubrovo, Zhukov Ravine, and Okskiy Siyezd sections. Revising the biostratigraphy allows us to assume that the two zones of anomalous paleomagnetic directions in the composite magnetic polarity scale of the upper Permian of the Russian Platform are a reflection of the same epoch of an anomalous geomagnetic field configuration. It is estimated by the cyclostratigraphic method that the studied 16 m interval of the Staroe Slukino section took 900 ± 20 thousand years to accumulate, which limits the duration of the geomagnetic field anomalous state near the Permian-Triassic boundary to ~110  thousand years. A new Permian-Triassic (~252 Ma) paleomagnetic pole of the East European Platform is calculated: plat = 36.3°; plong = 155.0°; dp/dm = 2.8°/4.8°.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.

REFERENCES

  1. Boyarinova, E.I., Golubev, V.K., and Bulanov, V.V., Chronology of postcranial osteoderm localities of late Permian pareiasaurs from Eastern Europe, Paleontologiya i stratigrafiya: sovremennoe sostoyanie i puti razvitiya. Materialy 68 sessii paleontologicheskogo obshchestva, posvyashchennoy 100-letiyu A.I. Zhamoidy (Paleontology and Stratigraphy: Current State and Ways Forward, Proc. 68th Session of the Paleontological Society, dedicated to the 100th Anniversary of A.I. Zhamoida), Rozanov, A.Yu., Petrov, O.V., et al., Eds., St. Petersburg, 2022, St. Petersburg: VSEGEI, 2022, pp. 196–198.

  2. Enkin, R.J., A Computer Program Package for Analysis and Presentation of Paleomagnetic Data, Pacific Geoscience Centre, Geological Survey of Canada, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fetisova, A.M., Balabanov, Yu.P., Veselovskiy, R.V., and Mamontov, D.A., Anomalous magnetization of the Permian-Triassic Nedubrovo red beds, Moscow basin, Vestn. S.‑Peterb. Univ., Nauki Zemle, 2018a, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 544–560. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu07.2018.409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fetisova, A.M., Veselovskiy, R.V., Scholze, F., and Balabanov, Yu.P., The new Permian-Triassic paleomagnetic pole for the East European Platform corrected for inclination shallowing, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2018b, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 150–162. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1069351318010068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fetisova, A.M., Veselovskiy, R.V, and Arefiev, M.P., New paleomagnetic data on the Permian-Triassic sedimentary sections of the Moscow Syneclise, Uch. Zap. Kazan. Univ., Ser. Estestv. Nauki, 2020, vol. 162, no. 2, pp. 228–243. https://doi.org/10.26907/2542-064X.2020.2.228-243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fetisova, A.M., Golubev, V.K., Veselovskiy, R.V., and Balabanov, Yu.P., Paleomagnetism and magnetostratigraphy of Permian-Triassic reference sections in the central Russian plate: Zhukov ravine, Slukino, and Okskiy siyezd, Russ. Geol. Geophys., 2022, vol. 63, no. 10. pp. 1162–1176. https://doi.org/10.2113/RGG20214336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Golubev, V.K., Minikh, A.V. Balabanov, Yu.P., Kukhtinov, D.A., Sennikov, A.G., and Minikh, M.G., Reference section of the Permian and Triassic in Zhukov ravine near the town of Gorokhovets, Vladimir region, Bull. Reg. Interdep. Stratig. Comm. Cent. South Russ. Platform, 2012a, no. 5, pp. 49–82.

  8. Golubev, V.K., Sennikov, A.G., Minikh, A.V., and Karasev, E.V., Paleontological Characteristics of the Permian–Triassic Deposits in Nizhny Novgorod City, in Paleostrat-2012.Tezisy dokladov Godichnogo sobraniya (nauchn. konf.) sektsii paleontologii MOIP i Moskovskogo otd. Paleontologicheskogo obshchestva pri RAN (Paleostrat-2012, Abstracts, annual meeting (scientific conference) of the Paleontological group of the Moscow Society of Naturalists and the Moscow branch of the Paleontological Society under the Russian Academy of Sciences), Alekseev, A.S., Ed., Moscow, 2012b, Moscow: Paleont. Inst. RAN, 2012b, pp. 23–25.

  9. Hasselmann, K., Stochastic climate models: part I. Theory, Tellus, 1976, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 473–485. https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v28i6.11316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hounslow, M.W. and Balabanov, Y.P., A geomagnetic polarity timescale for the Permian, calibrated to stage boundaries, in The Permian Timescale, Lucas, S.G. and Shen, S.Z., Eds., Geol. Soc. London, Spec. Publ., 2018, vol. 450, pp. 61–103. https://doi.org/10.1144/SP450.8

  11. Khramov, A.N., Geomagnetic reversals in the Paleozoic: a transitional field, polarity bias, and mantle convection, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2007, vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 800–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Khramov, A.N. and Iosifidi, A.G., Asymmetry of geomagnetic polarity: equatorial dipole, Pangaea, and the Earth’s core, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2012, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 28–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kirschvink, J.L., The least-square line and plane and the analysis of paleomagnetic data, Geophys. J. Int., 1980, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 699–718. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1980.tb02601.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kodama, K.P. and Hinnov, L.A., Rock Magnetic Cyclostratigraphy, UK: Wiley Blackwell, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118561294

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Laskar, J., Robutel, P., Joutel, F., Gastineau, M., Correia, A.C.M., and Levrard, B., A long-term numerical solution for the insolation quantities of the Earth, Astron. Astrophys., 2004, vol. 428, no. 1, pp. 261–285. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20041335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li, M., Hinnov, L., and Kump, L., Acycle: Time-series analysis software for paleoclimate research and education, Comput. Geosci., 2019, vol. 127, pp. 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2019.02.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. McFadden, P.L. and McElhinny, M.W., Classification of the reversal test in palaeomagnetism, Geophys. J. Int., 1990, vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 725–729. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1990.tb05683.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Molostovsky, E.A. and Khramov, A.N., Magnitostratigrafiya i ee znacheniye v geologii (Magnetostratigraphy and their meaning in geology), Saratov: Saratov Univer. Publishing House, 1997.

  19. Naumcheva, M.A., Ostracods and biostratigraphy of Permian-Triassic boundary deposits in the Central regions of the Russian Plate, Cand. Sci. (Geol.-Mineral.) Dissertation, Moscow: Moscow State University, 2020, p. 264.

  20. Naumcheva, M.A. and Golubev, V.K., Ostracod assemblages from the Permian-Triassic boundary interval of the Moscow Syneclise, Reg. Geol. Metallog., 2019, no. 80, pp. 21–29.

  21. Naumcheva, M.A. and Golubev, V.K., Nonmarine ostracodes at the Permian-Triassic boundary of the central part of the East European Platform, Palaeoworld, 2020, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 353–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palwor.2019.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sennikov, A.G. and Golubev, V.K., Sequence of Permian tetrapod faunas of Eastern Europe and the Permian-Triassic ecological crisis, Paleontol. J., 2017, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 600–611. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0031030117060077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shatsillo, A.V. and Pavlov, V.E., Systematics of paleomagnetic directions from early-middle Devonian rocks of Minusa troughs: new data and old problems, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2019, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 471–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Slepian, D. and Pollak, H.O., Prolate spheroidal wave functions, Fourier analysis and uncertainty—I, Bell Syst. Tech. J., 1961, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1961.tb03976.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. The Permian-Triassic boundary in the continental series of Eastern Europe, Proc. Int. Symp. “Upper Permian Stratotypes of the Volga Region,” Lozovskii, V.R. and Esaulova, N.K., Eds., Moscow: GEOS, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Thomson, D.J., Spectrum analysis and harmonic analysis, Proc. IEEE, 1982, vol. 70, no. 9, pp. 1055–1096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Veselovskiy, R.V., Dubinya, N.V., Ponomarev, A.V., Fokin, I.V., Patonin, A.V., Pasenko, A.M., Fetisova, A.M., Matveev, M.A., Afinogenova, N.A., Rud’ko, D.V., and Chistyakova, A.V., Shared research facilities “Petrophysics, Geomechanics and Paleomagnetism” of the Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth RAS, Geodin. Tektonofiz., 2022, vol. 13, no. 2, Article ID 0579. https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2022-13-2-0579

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank T.E. Bagdasaryan and I.E. Lebedev for their invaluable assistance in conducting field studies and two reviewers whose comments significantly improved the quality of this paper.

Funding

The paleomagnetic and cyclostratigraphic studies were funded by Grant No. 22-27-00597 of the Russian Science Foundation. The laboratory studies were carried out by means of the equipment of the shared research facilities “Petrophysics, Geomechanics, and Paleomagnetism” of the Institute of Physics of the Earth of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Geology, Moscow State University, 119991, Moscow, Russia

    A. M. Fetisova, R. V. Veselovskiy & K. A. Sirotin

  2. Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences, 123242, Moscow, Russia

    A. M. Fetisova, R. V. Veselovskiy, K. A. Sirotin & D. V. Rud’ko

  3. Borissiak Paleontological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, 117647, Moscow, Russia

    V. K. Golubev

Authors
  1. A. M. Fetisova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. V. Veselovskiy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. K. A. Sirotin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. V. K. Golubev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. D. V. Rud’ko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. M. Fetisova.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fetisova, A.M., Veselovskiy, R.V., Sirotin, K.A. et al. Paleomagnetism and Cyclostratigraphy of the Permian-Triassic Boundary Interval of the Staroe Slukino Section, Vladimir Region. Izv., Phys. Solid Earth 59, 254–266 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1069351323020064

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1069351323020064

Keywords:

Search

Navigation