Abstract—The regional version of the method of linear integral representations is used to interpret the data on the anomalous physical fields of the Earth. The reconstruction of field elements is reduced to the solution of ill-conditioned systems of linear algebraic equations with an approximate right-hand side. The results of the mathematical experiment on finding analytical continuation of the Earth’s gravity and magnetic fields are presented.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Acuna, M., Connerney, J., Ness, N., Lin, R., Mitchell, D., Carlson, C., McFadden, J., Anderson, K., Reme, H., Mazelle, C., Vignes, D., Wasilewski, P., and Cloutier, P., Global distribution of crustal magnetism discovered by the mars global surveyor MAG/ERExperiment, Science, 1999, vol. 284, pp. 790–793.
Arkani-Hamed, J., An improved 50-degree spherical harmonic model of the magnetic field of Mars derived from both high-altitude and low-altitude data, J. Geophys. Res.: Planets, 2002, vol. 107, Paper ID 5083. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JE001835
Dolgal, A.S. and Bychkov, S.G., Estimation of differences in gravity anomalies for flat and spherical Earth models, Mater. Vseross. konf. mezhdunar. uchastiem “Devyatye nauchn. chteniya Yu.P. Bulashevicha”: Glubinnoe stroenie, geodinamika, teplovoe pole Zemli (Proc. All-Russ. Conf. Int. Participation: The 9th Bulashevich Scientific Readings: Deep Structure, Geodynamics, Thermal Field of the Earth, Interpretation of Geophysical Fields), Yekaterinburg, 2017, Yekaterinburg: IGF UrO RAN, 2017, pp. 169–173.
Dolgal, A.S., Simanov, A.A., and Khokhlova, V.V., Allowance for the Earth’s sphericity in quantitative interpretation of gravity anomalies, Georesursy, 2015, no. 4-2 (63), pp. 56–61.
Gudkova, T.V., Stepanova, I.E., and Batov, A.V., Density anomalies in subsurface layers of Mars: model estimates for the site of the InSight mission seismometer, Sol. Syst. Res., 2020, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 15–19.
Gudkova, T., Stepanova, I., Batov, A., and Shchepetilov, A., Modified method S- and R-approximations in solving the problems of Mars’s morphology, Inverse Probl. Sci. Eng., 2021, vol. 29, pp. 790–804. https://doi.org/10.1080/17415977.2020.1813125
Krylov, V.I. and Shulgina, L.T., Spravochnaya kniga po chislennomu integrirovaniyu (Reference Book on Numerical Integration), Moscow: Nauka, 1966.
Martyshko, P.S. and Martyshko, M.P., Equations of 3D inverse problems of magnetometry and algorithm of their solution for celestial bodies, Ural. Geofiz. Vestn., 2015, no. 2 (26), pp. 50–53.
Martyshko, P.S., Ladovskiy, I.V., and Byzov, D.D., Stable methods of interpretation of gravimetric data, Dokl. Earth Sci., 2016, vol. 471, no.2, pp. 1319–1322.
Meyer, B, Saltus, R., and Chulliat, A., EMAG2v3: Earth Magnetic Anomaly Grid (2-arc-minute resolution), Version 3, NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, 2017. https://doi.org/10.7289/V5H70CVX
Mikhailov, V.O., Timoshkina, E.P., Kiseleva, E.A., Khairetdinov, S.A., Dmitriev, P.N., Kartashov, I.M., and Smirnov, V.B., Problems of the joint inversion of temporal gravity variations with the data on land and seafloor displacements: a case study of the Tohoku-Oki earthquake of March 11, 2011, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2019, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 746–752.
Pan, L., Quantin, C., Tauzin, B., Michaut, C., Golombek, M., Lognonné, P., Grindrod, P., Langlais, B., Gudkova, T., Stepanova, I., Rodriguez, S., and Lucas, A., Crust heterogeneities and structure at the dichotomy boundary in western Elysium Planitia and implications for InSight lander, Icarus, 2020, vol.338, Paper ID 113511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2019.113511
Pavlenkova, N.I., Yegorova, T.P., Starostenko, V.I., and Kozlenko, V.G., 3D density model of the lithosphere of Europe, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Fiz. Zemli, 1991, no. 4, pp. 3–23.
Portniaguine, O. and Zhdanov, M., Focusing geophysical inversion images, Geophysics, 1999, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 874–887.
Portniaguine, O. and Zhdanov, M., 3-D magnetic inversion with data compression and image focusing, Geophysics, 2002, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 1532–1541.
Raevskiy D.N. and Stepanova, I.E., On the solution of inverse problems of gravimetry by the modified method of S‑approximations, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2015a, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 207–218.
Raevskiy D.N. and Stepanova, I.E., The modified method of S-approximations: Regional version, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2015b, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 197–206.
Salnikov, A.M., Batov, A.V., Gudkova, T.V., and Stepanova, I.E., Analysis of the magnetic field data of Mars, Abstr. 11th Moscow Solar System Symp. (11M-S3), Moscow, 2020, Moscow: IKI, 2020, Abstract ID MS-PS-03. https://doi.org/10.21046/11MS3-2020
Salnikov, A., Stepanova, I., Gudkova, T., and Batov, A., Analytical modeling of the magnetic field of Mars from satellite data using modified S-approximations, Dokl. Earth Sci., 2021, vol. 499, pp. 575–579.
Schattner, U., Segev, A., Mikhailov, V., et al., Magnetic signature of the Kinneret–Kinarot Tectonic Basin along the Dead Sea transform, Northern Israel, Pure Appl. Geophys., 2019, vol. 176, no. 10, pp. 4383–4399.
Shimbirev, B.P., Teoriya figury Zemli (Theory of the Figure of the Earth), Moscow: Nedra, 1975.
Stepanova, I., On the S-approximation of the Earth’s gravity field, Inverse Probl. Sci. Eng., 2008, vol. 16, no. 15, pp. 547–566.
Stepanova, I.E., On the S-approximation of the Earth’s gravity field: Regional version, Inverse Probl. Sci. Eng., 2009, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 1095–1111.
Stepanova, I. and Raevsky, D., On the solution of inverse problems of gravimetry by the modified method of S-approximations, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2015, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 207–218.
Stepanova, I.E., Raevskiy, D.N., and Shchepetilov, A.V., On the interpretation of large gravimagnetic data by the modified method of S-approximations, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2017, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 116–129.
Stepanova, I.E., Kerimov, I.A., and Yagola, A.G., Approximation approach in various modifications of the method of linear integral representations, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2019, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 218–231.
Stepanova, I., Kerimov, I., Raevskiy, D., and Shchepetilov, A., Improving the methods for processing large data in geophysics and geomorphology based on the modified S- and F-approximations, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2020a, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 364–378.
Stepanova, I.E., Raevskiy, D.N., and Shchepetilov, A.V., Separation of potential fields generated by different sources, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2020b, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 379–391.
Stepanova, I.E., Shchepetilov, A.V., Pogorelov, V.V., and Mikhailov, P.S., Using of structural-parametric approach for building digital elevation models and Earth’s gravity field using analytical S-approximations, Geofiz. Protsessy Biosfera, 2020c, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 107–116.
Strakhov, V.N., Geofizika i matematika (Geophysics and Mathematics), Moscow: OIFZ RAN, 1999.
Strakhov, V.N. and Stepanova, I.E., Solution of gravity problems by the S-approximation method (regional version), Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2002, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 535–544.
Uieda, L., Valéria, C.F. Barbosa, and Braitenberg, C., Tesseroids: Forward-modeling gravitational fields in spherical coordinates, Geophysics, 2015, vol. 81, no. 5, pp. F41–F48. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2015-0204.1
Wang, Y., Lukyanenko, D., and Yagola, A., Magnetic parameters inversion method with full tensor gradient data, Inverse Probl. Imaging, 2019, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 745–754.
Wang, Y., Kolotov, I., Lukyanenko, D., and Yagola, A., Reconstruction of magnetic susceptibility using full magnetic gradient data, Comput. Math. Math. Phys., 2020a, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 1000–1007.
Wang, Y., Leonov, A., Lukyanenko, D., and Yagola, A., General Tikhonov regularization with applications in geoscience, CSIAM Trans. Appl. Math., 2020b, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 53–85.
Yagola, A.G., Stepanova, I.E., Van Yanfey, and Titarenko, V.N., Obratnye zadachi i metody ikh resheniya. Prilozheniya k geofizike (Inverse Problems and Methods for Their Solution. Applications to Geophysics), Moscow: Binom, 2014.
Funding
The work was carried out in partial fulfillment of the state contract of Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Translated by M. Nazarenko
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stepanova, I.E., Shchepetilov, A.V. & Mikhailov, P.S. Analytical Models of the Physical Fields of the Earth in Regional Version with Ellipticity. Izv., Phys. Solid Earth 58, 406–419 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1069351322030089
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1069351322030089