Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth

, Volume 54, Issue 2, pp 201–213 | Cite as

Ray Tracing Methods in Seismic Emission Tomography

  • I. Ya. Chebotareva


Highly efficient approximate ray tracing techniques which can be used in seismic emission tomography and in other methods requiring a large number of raypaths are described. The techniques are applicable for the gradient and plane-layered velocity sections of the medium and for the models with a complicated geometry of contrasting boundaries. The empirical results obtained with the use of the discussed ray tracing technologies and seismic emission tomography results, as well as the results of numerical modeling, are presented.


  1. Aleksandrov, S.I., Mishin, V.A., and Burov, D.I., Problems of borehole and surface microseismic hydrofrac monitoring, Ekspozitsiya Neft’ Gaz, 2015, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 58–63.Google Scholar
  2. Chebotareva, I.Ya., New Algorithms of Emission tomography for passive seismic monitoring of a producing hydrocarbon deposit: Part I. Algorithms of processing and numerical simulation, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2010a, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 187–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chebotareva, I.Ya., New Algorithms of emission tomography for passive seismic monitoring of a producing hydrocarbon deposit: Part II. Results of real data processing, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2010b, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 199–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chebotareva, I.Ya., Algorithm of seismic emission tomography in case of spatial decorrelation of the signal, Vestn. Mosk. Gos. Obl. Univ., Ser. Estestv. Nauki, 2011a, no. 1, pp. 101–107.Google Scholar
  5. Chebotareva, I., Methods for passive study of the geological environment using seismic noise, Acoust. Phys., 2011b, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 857–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chebotareva, I.Ya., Structure and dynamics of the geological medium in the seismic noise fields: methods and empirical results, in Akustika neodnorodnykh sred. Ezhegodnik Rossiiskogo akusticheskogo obshchestva (Acoustics of Heterogeneous Media, Yearbook of the Russian Acoustic Society), vol. 12, Moscow: GEOS, 2012, pp. 141–146.Google Scholar
  7. Chebotareva, I.Ya., Locating of refraction point at the interfaces of complex geometry under a three-dimensional ray tracing, Vopr. Radioelektron., 2017a, no. 3, pp. 124–127.Google Scholar
  8. Chebotareva, I.Ya., Tay tracing in the method of seismic emission tomography, Radiopromyshlennost’, 2017b, no. 1, pp. 44–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chebotareva, I.Ya. and Volodin, I.A., Images of hydraulic fracture in seismic noise, Dokl. Earth Sci., 2012, vol. 444, no. 1, pp. 621–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Tchebotareva, I.I., Nikolaev, A.V., and Sato, H., Seismic emission activity of Earth’s crust in northern Kanto, Japan, Phys. Earth Planet Inter., 2000, vol. 120, no. 3, pp. 167–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jacob, K.H., Three-dimensional seismic ray tracing in a laterally heterogeneous spherical Earth, J. Geophys. Res., 1970, vol. 75, pp. 6675–6689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Koulakov, I., LOTOS code for local earthquake tomographic inversion: benchmarks for testing tomographic algorithms, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 2009, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 194–2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nikolaev, A.V. and Troitskiy, P.A., Lithospheric studies based on array analysis of P-coda and microseisms, Tectonophysics, 1987, vol. 140, pp. 103–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nikolaev, A.V., Troitskii, P.A, and Chebotareva, I.Ya., USSR Inventor’s Certificate no. 1000962, 1983.Google Scholar
  15. Nikolaev, A.V., Troitskii, P.A, and Chebotareva, I.Ya., Studying the lithosphere based on seismic noise, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1986, vol. 282, no. 9, pp. 586–591.Google Scholar
  16. Obara, K., Nonvolcanic deep tremor associated with subduction in Southwest Japan, Science, 2002, vol. 296, pp. 1679–1681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Roecker, S.W., Sabitova, T.V. Vinnik, L.P., et al., Threedimentional elastic wave velocity structure of the western and central Tien Shan, J.Geophys. Res., 1993, vol. 98, no. 9, pp. 15779–15795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Shmakov, F.D., Surface microseismic monitoring of hydraulic fracture: data processing and interpretation, Tekhnol. Seismorazvedki, 2012, no. 3, pp. 65–72.Google Scholar
  19. Stupina, T. and Kulakov, I., Complexity–structure-based approach to studying the range of applicability of the PROFIT algorithm, in Int. Book Series “Information Science and Computing,” 2009, pp. 79–85. The paper is selected from XVth International Conference “Knowledge-Dialogue-Solution” KDS-2 2009, Kyiv, Ukraine, October 2009. Scholar
  20. Um, J. and Thurber, C., A fast algorithm for two-point seismic ray tracing, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 1987, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 972–986.Google Scholar
  21. Volodin, I.A. and Chebotareva, I.Ya., Seismic emission in technological impact zones, Acoust. Phys., 2014, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 543–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Zhao, D., Hasegawa, A., and Horiuchi, S., Tomographic imaging of P and S wave velocity structure beneath northeastern Japan, J. Geophys. Res., 1992, vol. 97, pp. 19909–19928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Oil and Gas Research InstituteRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations