Skip to main content
Log in

Convection model of post-glacial uplift

  • Published:
Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new approach to analytical and numerical study of the process of the post-glacial uplifting of the Earth’s surface was proposed within the framework of a viscous model. Displacement of the Earth’s surface is considered as the motion of the density boundary due to chemico-density convection. It is shown that the incorporation of the non-Newtonian rheology at observed velocities of post-glacial uplifts requires an obligatory presence of faults in the lithosphere and gives rise to quasi-uniform motion of the mantle material, whose viscosity under the lithosphere is, on the average, sufficiently small and amounts to ∼1019 Pa. The study of the stability of the constructed model of the post-glacial uplift considered as the chemico-density convection relative to the thermal convection shows that the velocity of thermal convection developing in the presence of a quasiuniform mantle flow related to the post-glacial recovery is ∼1 m/yr.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L. M. Cathles, The Viscosity of the Earth’s Mantle (Prinston University Press, Prinston, New Jersey, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  2. U. Christensen, “An Eulerian Technique for Thermomechanical Modeling of Lithospheric Extensions,” J. Geophys. Res. 97, 2015 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. L. M. Flesch, W. E. Holt, A. J. Haines, and B. Shen-Tu, “Dynamics of the Pacific-North American Plate Boundary in the Western United States,” Science 287, 834 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. S. V. Gavrilov, “Emplacement of Thermal Diapires into a Continental Lithospheric Plate from the Non-Newtonian Upper Mantle,” Fizika Zemli, No. 7–8, 18 (2003) [Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth 30 (7/8) (1995).

  5. L. D. Landau and K. M. Lifshits, Hydrodynamics (Nauka, Moscow, 1986) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. A. Milne, G. I. Davis, J. X. Mitrovica, et al., “Space-Geodetic Constraints on Glacial Isostatic Adjustment in Fennoscandia,” Science 291, 2381 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. G. Schubert, D. L. Turcotte, and P. Olson, Mantle Convection in the Earth and Planets (Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. L. Turcotte and G. Schubert Geodynamics: Applications of Continuum Physics to Geological Problems (Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. M. Tushingham and W. R. J. Peltier, “A new Global Model for the Pleistocene Deglaciation Based upon Geophysical Predictions of Relative Sea Level Changes,” Geophys. Res. 96, 4497 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. V. S. Vladimirov, Equations of Mathematical Physics (Nauka, Moscow, 1988) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. Wheeler and N. White, “Quest for Dynamic Topography: Observations from Southeast Asia,” Geology, 28, 963 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. V. N. Zharkov, Geophysical Study of Planets and Satellites (OIFZ RAS, Moscow, 1975) [In Russian].

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Original Russian Text © S.V. Gavrilov, 2009, published in Fizika Zemli, 2009, No. 5, pp. 70–76.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gavrilov, S.V. Convection model of post-glacial uplift. Izv., Phys. Solid Earth 45, 437–443 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1069351309050073

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1069351309050073

PACS numbers

Navigation