Skip to main content
Log in

Some results of applying methods of natural electromagnetic and seismic fields in the North Caucasus

  • Published:
Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A comprehensive analysis by the methods of natural electromagnetic fields, earthquake converted waves, and deep seismic sounding provided detailed constraints on the section of the crust and sedimentary cover in Ciscaucasia and revealed areas of the maximum crustal permeability on the Scythian plate and suture and underthrusting zones in the North Caucasus fold system. Based on seismic and electric evidence, the connected porosity is estimated at 1.5–3%, with the background value being smaller than 0.1%. These junction zones of the Scythian plate and fold block structures of the Main Caucasus Ridge are characterized by a decrease in the electrical resistivity by more than an order of magnitude, a more than fivefold drop in converted wave amplitudes, and a decrease in the converted and longitudinal wave velocities by up to 6%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Atlas of North Caucasus Maps (1:1000000): Tectonic Map of the North Caucasus, Map of Residual Gravity Anomalies, Map of Magnetic Anomalies, and Service Map of North Caucasus Combustible Minerals, Ed. by N. I. Prutskii (Severo-Kavkazskii Regional’nyi Geol. Tsentr MPR Rossii, GUP, and “Tsentral’naya Geologo-S” emochnaya Ekspeditsiya,” Essentuki, 1998) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  2. K. Bahr, “Geological Noise in Magnetotelluric Data: A Classification of Distortion Types,” Phys. Earth Planet Int. 66, 24–38 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. M. L. Bazhenov and V. S. Burtman, Structural Arcs of the Carpathians-Caucasus-Pamirs Alpine Belt (Nauka, Moscow, 1990) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  4. V. V. Belyavsky, “Invariant Curves of Magnetotelluric Sounding,” Geofiz. Zh. 20(5), 99–104 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  5. V. V. Belyavsky, “Multiplicative Analysis of Magnetotelluric Data Measured on the Krasnaya Polyana Profile (the North Caucasus),” Razved. Okhr. Nedr, No. 4, 28–37 (2004).

  6. V. V. Belyavsky, V. A. Bobrov, S. V. Goshovskii, et al., Geoelectric Models of Auriferous Deposits of the Ukrainian Shield and Donbass, Ed. by V. V. Belyavsky (Znannya, Kiev, 2004) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  7. O. A. Bogatikov, Yu. V. Nechaev, and A. L. Sobisevich, “Cosmic Technologies in the Study of Geological Structures of Elbrus Volcano,” in Tectonics and Geodynamics of the Continental Lithosphere. Proc. XXXVI Tectonic Conf. (Geos, Moscow, 2003), Vol. 1, pp. 44–48 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  8. T. G. Caldwell, H. M. Bibby, and C. Brown, “The Magnetotelluric Phase Tensor,” Geophys. J. Int. 158, 457–469 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. J. L. Counil, J. L. le Mouel, and M. Menvielle, “Associate and Conjugate Directions Concepts in Magnetotellurics,” Ann. Geophys. 2(4), 115–130 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  10. V. Druskin and L. Knizhnerman, “Spectral Approach to Solving Three-Dimensional Maxwell’s Diffusion Equations in the Time and Frequency Domains,” Radio Sci. 29(4), 937–953 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. A. V. Egorkin, “Crustal Structure from Seismic Geotraverse Data,” in Deep Structure of the USSR Territory, Ed. by V. V. Belousov, N. I. Pavlenkova, and T. N. Kvyatkovskaya (Moscow, 1991), pp. 118–134 [in Russian].

  12. A. V. Egorkin, V. V. Kun, and N. M. Chernyshev, “Attenuation of P and S Waves in the Crust and Upper Mantle of the West Siberian Plate,” Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Fiz. Zemli, No. 2, 37–50 (1981).

  13. Geoelectric Model of the Tectonosphere of the Eurasian Fold Belt and Adjacent Territories, Ed. by V. V. Belyavsky and S. N. Kulik (Znannya, Kiev, 1998) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  14. V. V. Gordienko, “Implications of Deep Geoelectric Data for the Assessment of Tectogenesis Hypotheses,” Fiz. Zemli, No. 10, 54–63 (2002) [Izvestiya, Phys. Solid Earth 38, 846–854 (2002)].

  15. G. V. Krasnopevtseva, Deep Structure of the Seismically Active Caucasus Region (Nauka, Moscow, 1984) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  16. L. E. Levin and N. V. Kondorskaya, “Seismicity of the Central Mediterranean Belt of Eurasia in Relation to the Development of the Oil and Gas Complex,” Razved. Okhr. Nedr, No. 2, 28–31 (1998).

  17. Seismically Active Fluid-Magmatic Systems of the North Caucasus, Ed. by N. P. Laverov (IFZ RAN, Moscow, 2005) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  18. T. I. Shankland and H. S. Waff, “Partial Melting and Electrical Conductivity Anomalies in the Upper Mantle,” J. Geophys. Res. 33, 5409–5417 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. A. G. Shempelev, V. Ya. P’yankov, V. A. Lygin, et al., “Geophysical Results from the Near-Elbrus Profile (Elbrus Volcano-Kavkazskie Mineralnye Vody),” Region. Geol. Metallogeniya, No. 25, 178–185 (2005).

  20. Tectonic Layering of the Lithosphere and Regional Geological Studies, Ed. by Yu. M. Pushcharovskii (Nauka, Moscow, 1990) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  21. L. L. Vanyan and N. I. Pavlenkova, “Low Velocity and Low Electrical Resistivity Layer at the Base of the Upper Crust under the Baltic Shield,” Fiz. Zemli, No. 1, 37–45 (2002) [Izvestiya, Phys. Solid Earth 38, 33–41 (2002)].

  22. I. M. Varentsov, “A General Approach to the Magnetotelluric Data Inversion in a Piecewise-Continuous Medium,” Fiz. Zemli, No. 11, 11–33 (2002) [Izvestiya, Phys. Solid Earth 38, 913–934 (2002)].

  23. B. G. Voblikov and A. F. Lopatin, “Tectonic Structure of Paleozoic Deposits in the Central and Eastern Ciscaucasia,” in Tectonics and Geodynamics (Stavropol, 2002), pp. 87–108 [in Russian].

  24. M. R. J. Wyllie, A. R. Gregory, and L. W. Gardner, “Elastic Wave Velocities in Heterogeneous and Porous Media,” Geophysics 21, 41–70 (1956).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. P. Zhang, R. G. Roberts, and L. B. Pedersen, “Magnetotelluric Strike Rules,” Geophysics 52, 267–277 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Original Russian Text © V.V. Belyavsky, A.V. Egorkin, L.N. Solodilov, V.A. Rakitov, A.G. Yakovlev, 2007, published in Fizika Zemli, 2007, No. 4, pp. 4–14.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Belyavsky, V.V., Egorkin, A.V., Solodilov, L.N. et al. Some results of applying methods of natural electromagnetic and seismic fields in the North Caucasus. Izv., Phys. Solid Earth 43, 268–277 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1069351307040027

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1069351307040027

PACS numbers

Navigation