Skip to main content
Log in

Results of the monitoring of geomagnetic field variations in the Kamchatka region

  • Published:
Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The transfer function between the vertical and horizontal components of geomagnetic field variations is studied and the frequency responses of its parameters are presented. The relation to geoelectric heterogeneities of the medium is analyzed. The coast effect is considered and a deep curve of the apparent electrical resistivity constructed on its basis is used for estimating the depth to the asthenospheric conducting layer. The behavior of the induction vectors in the frequency-time domain is studied. Specific features of the behavior of the real and imaginary parts of the induction vector related to geoelectric heterogeneities of the medium are determined. Monitoring results are compared with time moments of earthquakes of K = 13−14 at epicentral distances of up to 150 km.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. N. Berdichevsky, Geoelectric Survey by the Magnetotelluric Profiling Method (Nauka, Moscow, 1968) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. N. Berdichevsky and M. S. Zhdanov, Interpretation of Anomalies in the Alternating Electromagnetic Field of the Earth (Nedra, Moscow, 1981) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. P. Kharin, “Temporal Variations in Transfer Functions of the Earth’s Electromagnetic Field,” Geofiz. Zh. 3(3), 16–24 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  4. I. C. Larsen, “Noise Reduction in Electromagnetic Time Series to Improve Detection of Seismic-Induced Signals,” J. Geomagn. Geoelectr. 49, 1257–1265 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  5. B. E. Marderfeld, The Coast Effect in Geomagnetic Variations (Nauka, Moscow, 1977) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yu. F. Moroz, Electrical Conductivity of the Crust and the Upper Mantle (Nauka, Moscow, 1991) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yu. F. Moroz and V. M. Kobzova, “Physical Simulation and Numerical Modeling of the Magnetotelluric Field in the Kamchatka Region,” Vulkanol. Seismol., 86–98 (1994).

  8. Yu. F. Moroz, E. F. Vershinin, V. P. Nazarets, and T. A. Moroz, “Anomalous Effects in Geomagnetic Field Variations in the Kamchatka Region,” Vulkanol. Seismol., No. 2, 32–37 (2002).

  9. I. I. Rokityanskii, The Study of Electrical Conductivity Anomalies by the Magnetic Variation Profiling Method (Naukova Dumka, Kiev, 1975) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  10. U. Schmucker, Anomalies of Geomagnetic Variations in the South Western United States (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Original Russian Text © Yu.F. Moroz, S.E. Smirnov, T.A. Moroz, 2006, published in Fizika Zemli, 2006, No. 3, pp. 49–56.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moroz, Y.F., Smirnov, S.E. & Moroz, T.A. Results of the monitoring of geomagnetic field variations in the Kamchatka region. Izv.-Phys. Solid Earth 42, 225–232 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1069351306030050

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1069351306030050

PACS numbers

Navigation