Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling of the Earth’s pole motion from data on the atmospheric and oceanic angular momenta over 1980–2002

  • Published:
Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The model values of the mantle quality factor Q=40±20 and the Chandler wobble period T=435–436 days are obtained by numerical modeling of the yearly and Chandler components in the pole motion from data on the angular momenta of the atmosphere and the ocean. The oceanic and the atmospheric excitations account for about 65–70% of the dispersion of the observed pole motion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. T. Barnes, H. R. Hide, A. A. White, and C. A. Wilson, “Atmospheric Angular Momentum Fluctuations, Length-of-Day Changes and Polar Motion,” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 387, 31–73 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. S. Gross, “Atmospheric and Oceanic Excitation of Length-of-Day Variations during 1980–2000,” J. Geophys. Res. (2003) in press.

  3. R. S. Gross, I. Fukumori, and D. Menemenlis, “Atmospheric and Oceanic Excitation of the Earth’s Wobbles during 1980–2000,” J. Geophys. Res. 108(B8), 2370 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. E. Kalnay, “The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project,” Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 77, 437–471 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. S. M. Molodensky and V. N. Zharkov, “On the Chandler Wobble and the Frequency Dependence of the Mantle Q m,” Izv. Akad. Nauk, Fiz. Zemli, No. 4, 3–16 (1981).

  6. D. A. Salstein, D. M. Kann, A. J. Miller, and R. D. Rosen, “The Sub-Bureau for Atmospheric Angular Momentum of the International Earth Rotation Service (IERS): A Meteorological Data Center with Geodetic Applications,” Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 74(1) (1993).

  7. D. A. Salstein and R. D. Rosen, “Global Momentum and Energy Signals from Reanalysis Systems,” in 7th Conf. on Climate Variations (A. Meteorol. Soc., Boston, 1997), pp. 344–348.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. A. Salstein, Y. H. Zhou, and J. I. Chen, “Revised Angular Momentum Datasets for Atmospheric Angular Momentum Studies,” in European Geophysical Union (EGU) Spring Meeting. Vienna. Austria (2005).

  9. N. S. Sidorenkov, Physics of Irregularities in the Earth’s Rotation (Nauka, Moscow, 2002) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  10. L. M. Smith and F. A. Dahlen, “The Period and Q of the Chandler Wobble,” Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 64, 223–281 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  11. E. A. Spiridonov and Ya. V. Akimenko, “Modeling of the Polar Motion from Data on the Atmospheric and Oceanic Angular Momenta,” Fiz. Zemli, No. 11, 64–73 (2003) [Izvestiya, Phys. Solid Earth 39, 933–942 (2003)].

  12. Y. H. Zhou, D. A. Salstein, and J. Chen, Revised AAM Datasets under Consideration of Earth’s Topography and Earth’s Variable Rotation (2005) in press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Original Russian Text © E.A. Spiridonov, I.Ya. Tsurkis, 2006, published in Fizika Zemli, 2006, No. 2, pp. 64–71.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spiridonov, E.A., Tsurkis, I.Y. Modeling of the Earth’s pole motion from data on the atmospheric and oceanic angular momenta over 1980–2002. Izv.-Phys. Solid Earth 42, 149–155 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1069351306020066

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1069351306020066

PACS numbers

Navigation