Skip to main content

Comparison of QSAR models based on combinations of genetic algorithm, stepwise multiple linear regression, and artificial neural network methods to predict K d of some derivatives of aromatic sulfonamides as carbonic anhydrase II inhibitors

Russian Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry volume 40, pages 61–75 (2014)Cite this article

Abstarct

Four stepwise multiple linear regressions (SMLR) and a genetic algorithm (GA) based multiple linear regressions (MLR), together with artificial neural network (ANN) models, were applied for quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) modeling of dissociation constants (K d) of 62 arylsulfonamide (ArSA) derivatives as human carbonic anhydrase II (HCA II) inhibitors. The best subsets of molecular descriptors were selected by SMLR and GA-MLR methods. These selected variables were used to generate MLR and ANN models. The predictability power of models was examined by an external test set and cross validation. In addition, some tests were done to examine other aspects of the models. The results show that for certain purposes GA-MLR is better than SMLR and for others, ANN overcomes MLR models.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  1. Maestrelli, F., Mura, P., Casini, A., Mincione, F., Scozzafava, A., and Supuran, C.T., J. Pharm. Sci., 2002, vol. 91, no. 10, pp. 2211–2219.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Melagraki, G., Afantitis, A., Sarimveis, H., Igglessi-Markopoulou, O., and Supuran, C.T., Bioorgan. Med. Chem., 2006, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1108–1114.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Agrawal, V.K., Banerji, M., Gupta, M., Singh, J., Khadikar, P.V., and Supuran, C.T., Eur. J. Med. Chem., 2005, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 1002–1012.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Winum, J.Y., Scozzafava, A., Montero, J.L., and Supuran, C.T., Med. Res. Rev., 2005, vol. 25, no. 2, 186–228.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zimmerman, S., Innocenti, A., Casini, A., Ferry, J.G., Scozzafava, A., and Supuran, C.T., Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2004, vol. 14, no. 24, pp. 6001–6006.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chazalette, C., Masereel, B., Rolin, S., Thiry, A., Scozzafava, A., Innocenti, A., and Supuran, C.T., Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2004, vol. 14, no. 23, pp. 5781–5786.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rusconi, S., Innocenti, A., Vullo, D., Mastrolorenzo, A., Scozzafava, A., and Supuran, C.T., Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2004, vol. 14, no. 23, pp. 5763–5767.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Krishnamurthy, V.M., Kaufman, G.K., Urbach, A.R., Gitlin, I., Gudiksen, K.L., Weibel, D.B., and Whitesides, G.M., Chem. Rev., 2008, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 946–1051.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dashtbozorgi, Z. and Golmohammadi, H., J. Sep. Sci., 2010, vol. 33, nos. 23–24, pp. 3800–3810.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dashtbozorgi, Z. and Golmohammadi, H., Eur. J. Med. Chem., 2010, vol. 45, no. 6, 2182–2190.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hansch, C., Hoekman, D., Leo, A., Zhang, L.T., and Li, P., Toxicol. Lett., 1995, vol. 79, nos. 1–3, pp. 45–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Krogsgaard-Larsen, P., Frolund, B., and Liljefors, T., Chem. Rec., 2002, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 419–430.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Consonni, V. and Todeschini, R., Handbook of Molecular Descriptors, Weinheim: Wiley-VCH, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Deeb, O., Hemmateenejad, B., Jaber, A., Garduno-Juarez, R., and Miri, R., Chemosphere, 2007, vol. 67, no. 11, pp. 2122–2130.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mandloi, D., Joshi, S., Khadikar, P.V., and Khosla, N., Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2005, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 405–411.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Johnson, T., Khan, I.A., Avery, M.A., Grant, J., and Meshnick, S.R., Antimicrob. Agents Ch., 1998, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 1454–1458.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Thakur, A., Thakur, M., Khadikar, P.V., Supuran, C.T., and Sudele, P., Bioorgan. Med. Chem., 2004, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 789–793.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hatami, T., Rahimi, M., Daraei, H., Heidaryan, E., Alsairafi, A.A., and Korean, J., Chem. Eng., 2012, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 657–667.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Daraei, H., Irandoust, M., Ghasemi, J.B., and Kurdian, A.R., J. Incl. Phenom. Macro., 2012, vol. 72, nos. 3–4, pp. 423–435.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Depczynski, U., Frost, V.J., and Molt, K., Anal. Chim. Acta, 2000, vol. 420, no. 2, pp. 217–227.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jouanrimbaud, D., Massart, D.L., Leardi, R., and Denoord, O.E., Anal. Chem., 1995, vol. 67, no. 23, pp. 4295–4301.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Maleki, A., Daraei, H., Alaei, L., Abasi, L., and Izadi, A., J. Chem. Soc. Pak., 2012, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 1056–1069.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Rocha, Pita S.S., Albuquerque, M.G., Rodrigues, C.R., Castro, H.C., and Hopfinger, A.J., Chem. Biol. Drug Design, 2012, vol. 79, no. 5, pp. 740–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Magee P.S., Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships, 1990, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 202–215.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jalali-Heravi, M., Asadollahi-Baboli, M., and Shahbazikhah, P., Eur. J. Med. Chem., 2008, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 548–556.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nieto, M., Alovero, F., Manzo, R., and Mazzieri, M.R., Eur. J. Med. Chem., 2005, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 361–369.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rastija, V. and Medić-Šarić, M., Eur. J. Med. Chem., 2009, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 400–408.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kumar, P., Singh, P., and Singh, J.P., Int. J. Res. Pharm. Biomed. Sci., 2012, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 65–72.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Glasstone, S., Thermodynamics for Chemists, Huntington: R.E. Krieger Pub. Co., 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ivanciuc, O., Ivanciuc, T., Klein, D.J., Seitz, W.A., and Balaban, A.T., J.Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 2001, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 536–549.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Dong, H.W. and Guo, X.F., Match-Commun. Math. Co., 2010, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 799–812.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rücker, C., Scarsi, M., and Meringer, M., Bioorgan. Med. Chem., 2006, vol. 14, no. 15, pp. 5178–5195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hemalatha, R., Soni, L., Gupta, A., and Kaskhedikar, S., E-Journal of Chemistry, 1900, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 243–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Chen, L., Yao, J., and Yang, J., Acta Pharmacol. Sin., 2005, vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 1322–1333.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Afantitis, A., Melagraki, G., Sarimveis, H., Koutentis, P.A., Markopoulos, J., and Igglessi-Markopoulou, O., Polymer, 2006, vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 3240–3248.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rucker, C., Rucker, G., and Meringer, M., J. Chem. Inf. Model., 2007, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 2345–2357.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Karki, R.G. and Kulkarni, V.M., Bioorgan. Med. Chem., 2001, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 3153–3160.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kovarich, S., Papa, E., and Gramatica, P., J. Hazard. Mater., 2011, vol. 190, nos. 1–3, pp. 106–112.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Topliss, J.G. and Edwards, R.P., J. Med. Chem., 1979, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 1238–1244.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Su, L., Li, L., Li, Y., Zhang, X., Huang, X., and Zhai, H., Med. Chem. Res., 2011, pp. 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Asadollahi, T., Dadfarnia, S., Shabani, A.M.H., Ghasemi, J.B., and Sarkhosh, M., Molecules, 2011, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 1928–1955.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Li, F., Wu, H.F., Li, L.Z., Li, X.H., Zhao, J.M., and Peijnenburg, W.J.G.M., Ecotox. Environ. Saf., 2012, vol. 80, pp. 273–279.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Kurdistan Environmental Health Research Center, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran

    Afshin Maleki & Hiua Daraei

  2. Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

    Loghman Alaei

  3. Faculty of Pharmacy, Kermanshah Medical Sciences University, Kermanshah, Iran

    Aram Faraji

Authors
  1. Afshin Maleki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hiua Daraei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Loghman Alaei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Aram Faraji
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiua Daraei.

Additional information

The article is published in the original.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maleki, A., Daraei, H., Alaei, L. et al. Comparison of QSAR models based on combinations of genetic algorithm, stepwise multiple linear regression, and artificial neural network methods to predict K d of some derivatives of aromatic sulfonamides as carbonic anhydrase II inhibitors. Russ J Bioorg Chem 40, 61–75 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1134/S106816201306006X

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S106816201306006X

Keywords

  • human carbonic anhydrase II
  • dissociation constants
  • QSAR
  • genetic algorithm
  • artificial neural network