Skip to main content

Isolation of pomolic acid from Chamaenerion angustifolium and the evaluation of its potential genotoxicity in bacterial test systems

Russian Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry volume 40, pages 82–88 (2014)Cite this article

Abstract

The lipophilic components of the medicinal plant, the fireweed (Chamaenerion angustifolium), have been examined using the raw materials of a three-year harvest. Twenty eight aliphatic and six triterpene acids have been detected for the first time by chromatography—mass spectrometry analysis. It has been shown using the Ames test and the SOS chromotest that pomolic acid possesses no genotoxic and mutagenic properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Abbreviations

C-MS:

chromatography—mass spectrometry

MTBE:

methyl tert-butyl ester

References

  1. Hussain, M.S., Fareed, S., Ansari, S., Rahman, M.A., Ahmad, I.Z., and Saeed, M., J. Pharm. Bioallied Sci., 2012, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 10–20.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bishayee, A., Ahmed, S., Brankov, N., and Perloff, M., Front. Biosci., 2011, vol. 16, pp. 980–996.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ovensna, Z., Vachalkov, A., Horvathov, K., and Tathova, D., Neoplasma, 2004, vol. 51, pp. 327–333.

    Google Scholar 

  4. The Wealth of India Raw Materials, New Delhi: Publications and Information Directorate, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, 2010, vol. 9, pp. 1948–1976.

  5. Huang, K.C., The Pharmacology of Chinese Herbs, Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sultana, N. and Ata, A., J. Enzyme Inhibit. Med. Chem., 2008, vol. 23, no. 23, pp. 739–756.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shah, B.A., Qazi, G.N., and Taneja, S.C., Nat. Prod. Rep., 2009, vol. 26, pp. 72–89.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Laszczyk, M.N., Planta Med., 2009, vol. 75, pp. 1549–1560.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Setzer, W.N. and Setzer, M.C., Mini Rev. Med. Chem., 2003, vol. 3, pp. 540–556.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Petronelli, A., Pannitteri, G., and Testa, U., Anti-Cancer Drugs, 2009, vol. 20, pp. 880–892.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liby, K.T., Yore, M.M., and Sporn, M.B., Nat. Rev. Cancer, 2007, vol. 7, pp. 357–369.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Budantsev, L.A., Rastitel’nye resursy Rossii: dikorastushchie tsvetkovye rasteniya, ikh komponentnyi sostav i biologicheskaya aktivnost’ (Plant Resources of Russia: Wild Flowering Plants, Their Component Structure, and Biological Activity), Moscow: Tovar. Nauch. Izd. KMK, 2009, vol. 2.

  13. Kukina, T.P., Frolova, T.S., and Sal’nikova, O.I., Khim. Rastit. Syr’ya, 2013 (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Numata, A., Yang, P., and Takahashi, C., Chem. Pharm. Bull., 1989, vol. 37, pp. 648–651.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kashiwada, Y., Wang, H.K., Nagao, T., Kitanaka, S., Yasuda, I., Fujioka, T., Yamagishi, T., Cosentino, L.M., Kozuka, M., Okabe, H., Ikeshiro, Y., Hu, C.Q., Yeh, E., and Lee, K.H., J. Nat. Prod., 1998, vol. 61, pp. 1090–1095.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Youn, S.H., Lee, J.S., Lee, M.S., Cha, E.Y., Thuong, P.T., Kim, J.R., and Chang, E.S., Biol. Pharm. Bull., 2012, vol. 35, pp. 105–110.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schinella, G., Aquila, S., Dade, M., Giner, R., Recio, MdelC., Spegazzini, E., de Buschiazzo, P., Tournier, H., and Rios, J.L., Planta Med., 2008, vol. 74, pp. 215–220.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fernandes, J., Weinlich, R., Castilho, R.O., Amarante-Mendes, G.P., and Gattass, C.R., Cancer Lett., 2007, vol. 245, nos. 1–2, pp. 315–320.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ovesna, Z., Kozics, K., and Slamenova, D., Mutat. Res., 2006, vol. 600, pp. 131–137.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Somova, L.O., Nadar, A., Rammanan, P., and Shode, F.O., Phytomedicine, 2003, vol. 10, p. 115.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Schmandke, H., Ernahrungs-Umschau, 2004, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 235–237.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Yang, Z.G., Li, H.R., and Wang, Y., Chem. Pharm. Bull., 2007, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 15–18.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Choudhary, M.I., Batool, I., Khan, S.N., Sultana, N., Shah, S.A., and Ur-Rahman, A., Nat. Prod. Res., 2008, vol. 22, pp. 489–494.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Vasconcelos, F.C., Gattass, C.R., Rumjanek, V.M., and Maia, R.C., Invest. New Drugs, 2007, vol. 25, pp. 1573–1646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kukina, T.P., Biologically active isoprenoids from buckthorn leaves, Cand. Sci. (Chem.) Dissertation, Novosibirsk: Inst. Bioorg. Khim. SO RAN, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Brieskorn, C.H. and Wunderer, H., Chem. Ber., 1967, vol. 100, pp. 1252–1265.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. O’Konek, J.J., Ladd, B., Flanagan, S.A., Im, M.M., Boucher, P.D., Thepsourinthone, T.S., Secrist, J.A., 3rd, and Shewach, D.S., Mutation Res., 2010, vol. 684, pp. 1–10.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Quillardet, P. and Hofnung, M., Mutat. Res., 1985, vol. 147, pp. 65–78.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ames, B.N. and Yamasaki, E., Mutat. Res., 1975, vol. 31, pp. 347–364.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Fonshtein, L.M., Abilev, S.K., and Bobrinev, E.V., Metody pervichnogo vyyavleniya geneticheskoi aktivnosti zagryaznitelei sredy s pomoshch’yu bakterial’nykh testsistem. Metodicheskie ukazaniya (Methods for Primary Detection of Genetic Activity of the Environmental Pollutants with Bacterial Test Systems: Methodical Instructions), Moscow: Nauka, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hudson, D.J., Statistics, Geneva: CERN, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Vasil’eva, L.A., Statisticheskie metody v biologii, meditsine i sel’skom khozyaistve (Statistical Methods in Biology, Medicine, and Agriculture), Novosibirsk: Inst. Tsitol. Genet. SO RAN, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mersch-Sundermann, V., Kevekordes, S., and Mochayedi, S., Mutat. Res., 1991, vol. 51, pp. 51–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Maron, D.M. and Ames, B.N., Mutat. Res., 1983, vol. 113, pp. 173–215.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Novosibirsk State University, ul. Pirogova 2, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia

    T. S. Frolova

  2. Vorozhtsov Institute of Organic Chemistry, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia

    O. I. Sal’nikova & T. P. Kukina

  3. Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia

    T. A. Dudareva & O. I. Sinitsyna

Authors
  1. T. S. Frolova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. O. I. Sal’nikova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. T. A. Dudareva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. T. P. Kukina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. O. I. Sinitsyna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. S. Frolova.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © T.S. Frolova, O.I. Sal’nikova, T.A. Dudareva, T.P. Kukina, O.I. Sinitsyna, 2014, published in Bioorganicheskaya Khimiya, 2014, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 92–98.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frolova, T.S., Sal’nikova, O.I., Dudareva, T.A. et al. Isolation of pomolic acid from Chamaenerion angustifolium and the evaluation of its potential genotoxicity in bacterial test systems. Russ J Bioorg Chem 40, 82–88 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1068162013060046

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1068162013060046

Keywords

  • fireweed
  • pomolic acid
  • bacterial test systems