Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Functional Efficiency of the Woody Vegetation Species Composition in Urban Green Spaces

  • Published:
Russian Journal of Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The article discusses the results of a comprehensive analysis of the ecological state and environment-stabilizing functions of woody vegetation species composition in the urban green space. The work is based on a large amount of factual material obtained during the course of a long-term monitoring of Vladivostok’s urban vegetation. A methodological substantiation for a comprehensive qualitative-quantitative assessment of species has been developed using the applied qualimetry techniques. An integral indicator, termed the species functional efficiency coefficient (SFEC) has been proposed as the main evaluation unit. It is a relative-quantitative characteristic of plant quality that is based on the vegetation’s functional efficiency and significance in urban ecosystems: prevalence in greenery planting, vitality, ability for accumulation of the pollutant metals in the urban environments, their concentration relative to the local environment background, and the capability for accumulating metals from the soil. Comparative analysis of the functional efficiency of 80 species of trees and shrubs of the urban vegetation of Vladivostok has been carried out on the basis of the proposed coefficient. Among the compared sample of plants, the SFEC decreases from 3.70 (Crataegus pinnatifida) to 1.13 (Malus mandshurica (Maxim.) Kom.). These values correspond to 74 and 23% of the conventional quality standard (QS) of the species. The groups of species with different functional significance in the urban green space structure have been identified. The best efficiency in creating the comfortable environmental conditions in the city has been demonstrated by the widespread species: Fraxinus mandshurica, Ulmus japonica, Betula platyphylla, Physocarpus opulifolia, etc. They are of the maximum level of participation in the formation of the urban vegetation structure and a high ability to absorb the main pollutants of the urban environments. The SFEC values for these species are within 3.26–2.61, which corresponds to 65–52% of the QS. Also, some suggestions on a rational use of species for the formation of a comfortable urban environment and the introduction of the results into the practice of managing the urban green fund have been proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

REFERENCES

  1. Alekseev, V.A., Diagnostics of vitality of trees and stands, Lesovedenie, 1989, no. 4, pp.  51–57.

  2. Aliman, M., Yustisia, A., Barlian, E., and Syah, N., Spatial analysis of the needs of green open space at Universitas Negeri Padang, Sumatra J. Disaster, Geogr., Geogr. Educ., 2017, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 140–146.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Avdeeva, E.V., Poletaikin, V.F., and Avdeeva, E.A., Level quality assement of green spaces by applied qualimetry techniques, Khvoinye Boreal. Zony, 2008, vol. XXV, nos. 1–2, pp. 93–97.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Avdeeva, E.V., Vagner, E.A., Nademyanov, V.F., and Chernikova, K.V., Information-analytical system “Quality management of urban greening facilities”. Module I – Monitoring the condition of urban greening facilities, Khvoinye Boreal. Zony, 2015a, vol. XXXIII, nos. 3–4, pp. 89–95.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Avdeeva, E.V., Vagner, E.A., Nademyanov, V.F., and Chernikova, K.V., Information-analytical system “Quality management of urban greening facilities” Module II—Assesment of the quality of urban greening facilities,” Khvoinye Boreal’noi Zony, 2015b, vol. XXXIII, nos. 3–4, pp. 96–102.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Azgal’dov, G.G., Glichev, A.V., and Panov, V.P., Chto takoe kachestvo? (What is Quality?), Moscow: Ekonomika, 1968.

  7. Azgal’dov, G.G. and Raikhman E.P., O kvalimetrii (On Qualimetry), Moscow: Izd. Standartov, 1973.

  8. Daniels, B., Zaunbrecher, B.S., Paas, B., Ottermanns, R., Ziefle, M., and Roß-Nickoll, M., Assessment of urban green space structures and their quality from a multidimensional perspective, Sci. Total Environ., 2018, vol. 615, pp. 1364–1378.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dennis, M. and James, P., Considerations in the valuation of urban green space: Accounting for user participation, Ecosyst. Serv., 2016, vol. 21, pp. 120–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fedorova, N.B., Definition of quality and value of green plantings in territory of St. Petersburg, Lesn. Vestn., 2011, no. 4, pp. 144–151.

  11. Ives, C., Oke, C., Cooke, B., Gordon, A., and Bekessy, S., Planning for Green Open Space in Urbanising Landscapes: Final Report for Australian Government Department of Environment, 2014.

  12. James, P., Tzoulas, K., Adams, M.D., Barber, A., Box, J., Breuste, J., Elmqvist, T., Frith, M., Gordon, C., Greening, K.L., Handley, J., Haworth, S., Kazmierczak, A.E., Johnston, M., Korpela, K., Moretti, M., Niemelä, J., Pauleit, S., Roe, M.H., and Sadler, J.P., Towards an integrated understanding of green space in the European built environment, Urban For. Urban Greening, 2009, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 65–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jankevica, M., Assessment of landscape ecological aesthetics in urban areas: Example of Jelgava, Res. Rural Dev., 2012, no. 2, pp. 134–140.

  14. Niemelä, J., Ecology of urban green spaces: The way forward in answering major research questions, Landscape Urban Plan., 2014, vol. 125, pp. 298–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Perel’man, A.I., Geokhimiya (Geochemistry), Moscow: Vyssh. Sh., 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ridder, K.De., Adamec, V., Bañuelos, A., Bruse, M., Bürger, M., Damsgaard, O., Dufek, J., Hirsch, J., Lefebre, F., Pérez–Lacorzana, J.M., Thierry, A., and Weber, C., An integrated methodology to assess the benefits of urban green space, Sci. Total Environ., 2004, vols. 334–335, pp. 489–497.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Saet, Y.E., Geochemical assessment of technogenic load on the environment, in Geokhimiya landshaftov i geografiya pochv (Geochemistry of Landscapes and Geography of Soils), Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1982, pp. 84–100.

  18. Shikhova, N.S., Ecological condition of vegetation soils in Vladivostok, Ekol. Urban. Territ., 2013, no. 1, pp. 97–102.

  19. Shikhova, N.S., Integral assessment of the forests of Vladivostok green belt, Lesovedenie, 2015, no. 6, pp. 436–446.

  20. Shikhova, N.S., The transformation of technogenic pollution of the environment by the Far Eastern arboriflora, Agrar. Vestn. Primor’ya, 2016, no. 1, pp. 29–32.

  21. Shikhova, N.S., Ecological and geochemical peculiarities of the South Primorye vegetation and arboriflora species specificity in the heavy metal accumulations, Sib. Lesn. Zh., 2017, no. 6, pp. 76–88.

  22. Shikhova, N.S., Assessment of the functional state of green plantings and the accumulation of heavy metals by vegetation in urban green areas for various purposes, Contemp. Probl. Ecol., 2019, vol. 12, pp. 502–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shikhova, N.S. and Polyakova, E.V., Assessment of the vital state and stability of species in the landscaping of Vladivostok, Byull. Gl. Bot. Sada, 2003, vol. 185, pp. 14–27.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shikhova, N.S. and Polyakova, E.V., Derev’ya i kustarniki v ozelenenii goroda Vladivostoka (The Trees and Shrubs in the Green Areas of Vladivostok), Vladivostok: Dal’nauka, 2006.

  25. Skachkova, M.E. and Kopalova, K.M., Methodological support for assessment of the comfort level of green spaces of public use, Prirodoobustroistvo, 2018, no. 2, pp. 125–131.

  26. Ufimtseva, M.D. and Terekhina, N.V., Fitoindikatsiya ekologicheskogo sostoyaniya urbogeosistem Sankt-Peterburga (Phytoindication of the Ecological State of the Urban Geosystems of St. Petersburg), St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2005.

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by ongoing institutional funding. No additional grants to carry out or direct this particular research were obtained.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Federal Scientific Center of East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far East Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, 690022, Vladivostok, Russia

    N. S. Shikhova

Authors
  1. N. S. Shikhova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. S. Shikhova.

Ethics declarations

ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE

This article does not contain any studies involving animals performed by any of the authors.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The author declares that she has no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Translated by T. Kuznetsova

Publisher’s Note.

Pleiades Publishing remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shikhova, N.S. Functional Efficiency of the Woody Vegetation Species Composition in Urban Green Spaces. Russ J Ecol 54, 693–703 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1067413623070135

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1067413623070135

Keywords:

Search

Navigation