Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamics of Projective Coverage and Species Diversity of Grass Communities During Restoration Succession on Fallows and Dumps

  • Published:
Russian Journal of Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The temporal dynamics of species diversity and projective coverage of herbaceous communities formed on fallows and dumps was studied. Annual studies of these phytocoenotic indicators were carried out in four groups on the territory of the Tagil zone of the Middle Urals in 2006–2019. The successional development of communities depends on edaphic factors. Phytocenoses with a projective coverage and species diversity typical for meadow communities on the background territories develop on agrozems and technozems under conditions of low soil contamination with heavy metals. The meadow stage under conditions of high pollution is short, and it is characterized by low values of the studied parameters. Other trajectories of succession: a long delay in the grass stage or skipping the meadow stage and transition from grass to tree-shrub stage, are also possible. The species diversity of communities is more conservative compared with the total projective coverage of species, the rate of development of which is largely determined by the successional age of the community than by the type of substrate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Mirkin, B.M. and Naumova, L.G., Basic trends in the development of the theory of syntaxonomy and plant communities dynamics, Zh. Obshch. Biol., 2014, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 83–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dikareva, T.V. and Oparin, M.L., Vegetation of the northern part of the dry steppes of the Trans-Volga region and its anthropogenic derivatives on fallow lands and pastures, Povolzh. Ekol. Zh., 2002, no. 3, pp. 199–216.

  3. Titlyanova, A.A. and Sambuu, A.D., Determinacy and synchronicity of fallow succession in the Tuva steppes, Biol. Bull., 2014, vol. 41, pp. 545–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bembeeva, O.G. and Dzhapova, R.R., Recovering succession fallow lands in the desert area of Kalmykia, Izv. Samar. Nauchn. Tsentra Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2012, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1195–1997.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Battaglia, L.L., Minchin, P.R., and Pritchett, D.W., Sixteen years of old-field succession and reestablishment of a bottomland hardwood forest in the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley, Wetlands, 2002, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2002)022[0001:S-YOOFS]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Knapp, S., Stadler, J., Harpke, A., and Klotz, S., Dispersal traits as indicators of vegetation dynamics in long-term old-field succession, Ecol. Indic., 2016, vol. 65, pp. 44–54.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.10.003

  7. Stadler, J., Klotz, S., Brandl, R., and Knapp, S., Species richness and phylogenetic structure in plant communities: 20 years of succession, Web Ecol., 2017, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Konysbaeva, D.T., The influence of the substrate of industrial dumps on the formation of vegetation, Vestn. Nauki Kostanaysk. Gos. Univ., 2002, pp. 152–158.

  9. Sibirina, L.A., Polokhin, O.V., and Zhabyko, E.V., Initial stages of the formation of plant cover in industry-caused ecotopes of the Primorsky territory, Izv. Samar. Nauchn. Tsentra Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2012, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1539–1542.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Likhanova, I.A., Lapteva, E.M., and Kovaleva, V.A., Productivity of plant communities and forest litter formation during self-restoring succession on technogenic materials, Izv. Samar. Nauchn. Tsentra Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2014, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 182–189.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lukina, N.V., Formation of the phytocoenosises on the ash dumps of Uzhnouralsk power station, Aridnye Ekosist., 2010, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 62–69.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lukina, N.V., Glazyrina, M.A., Filimonova, E.I., et al., Formation the vegetation on Bazhenovskiy deposit of chrysotile-asbestos, Izv. Samar. Nauchn. Tsentra Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2017, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 294–299.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Veselkin, D.V., Lukina, N.V., and Chibrik, T.S., The ratio of mycorrhizal and nonmycorrhizal plant species in primary technogenic successions, Russ. J. Ecol., 2015, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 417–424. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1067413615050203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chibrik, T.S., Lukina, N.V., Filimonova, E.I., et al., Phytocenosis formation at the Nizhneturinskaya power station ash dumps, Probl. Reg. Ekol., 2018, no. 6, pp. 27–29.

  15. Manakov, Yu.A. and Kupriyanov, A.N., Criteria for diagnostics of primary succession stages on the rockdumps of Kuzbass, Gorn. Inf.-Anal. Byull., 2009, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 186–193.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Naumova, L.G., Ekologicheskaya botanika. Fitotsenologiya: Uchebnoye posobie-ekstern dlya magistrantov biologicheskikh i ekologicheskikh napravlenii (Ecological Botany. Phytocenology: Study Guide for Undergraduates in Biology and Ecology), Ufa: Vagant, 2012.

  17. Lukina N.V., Filimonova, E.I., Glazyrina, M.A., and Chibrik, T.S., Structural organization of forest phytocenoses on industrial dumps in the Urals, Izv. Samar. Nauchn. Tsentra Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2015, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 220–224.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bezel’, V.S., Zhuikova, T.V., Gordeeva, V.A., et al., Aboveground phytomass and rate of plant debris decomposition in herbaceous communities exposed to soil pollution with heavy metals, Russ. J. Ecol., 2016, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 264–269.https://doi.org/10.1134/S1067413616040081

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Meling, E.V., Zhuikova, T.V., Goloushkina, E.V., and Gordeeva, V.A., Dynamics of grass communities on the dumps of the mining and metallurgical industry of Nizhny Tagil, Materialy V Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii “Biologicheskie sistemy: ustoichivost', printsipy i mekhanizmy funktsionirovaniya” (Proc. Fifth All-Russian Sci.-Pract. Conf. “Biological Systems: Stability, Principles and Mechanisms of Functioning”), Nizhnii Tagil: Nizhnetagil’skii Gos. Sots.-Ped. Inst., 2017, pp. 237–246.

  20. Zhuikova, T.V., Meling, E.V., Kaigorodova S.Yu., et al., Specific features of soils and herbaceous plant communities in industrially polluted areas of the Middle Urals, Russ. J. Ecol., 2015, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 213–221. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1067413615030133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhuikova, T.V., Bezel’, V.S., Bergman, I.E., et al., Dependence of phytomass of herbaceous cenoses on weather factors in anthropogenically impacted areas, Contemp. Probl. Ecol., 2018, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 428–437. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995425518040108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bezel’, V.S., Zhuikova, T.V., Gordeeva, V.A., et al., Aboveground phytomass and rate of plant debris decomposition in herbaceous communities exposed to soil pollution with heavy metals, Russ. J. Ecol., 2016, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 343–348. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1067413614020039

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhuikova, T.V., Meling, E.V., and Bezel’, V.S., Dynamics of alpha diversity during the restoration succession of grass communities of fallow lands and pits, Russ. J. Ecol., 2022, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 178–188.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mirkin, B.M. and Rozenberg, G.S., Fitotsenologiya: printsipy i metody. (Phytocenology: Principles and Methods), Moscow: Nauka, 1978.

  25. Lakin, G.F., Biometriya (Biometrics), Moscow: Vyssh. Shkola, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Glass, G. and Stanley, J., Statistical Methods in Education and Psychology, Hoboken: NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1970.

  27. Mirkin, B.M., Naumova, L.G., and Solomeshch, A.I., Sovremennaya nauka o rastitel’nosti: Ucheb. dlya vuzov (Modern Science of Vegetation: College Textbook), Moscow: Logos, 2000.

  28. Rabotnov, T.A., Lugovedenie: Uchebnik dlya universitytetov (Meadow Science: College Textbook), Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1984.

  29. Bigon, M., Harper, J.L., and Townsend, C.R., Ecology: Individuals, Populations and Communities, Oxford: Blackwell Scientific, 1986.

  30. Ulanova, N.G., Structure and dynamics of woodreed grass populations in different ecological conditions, Materialy yubileinoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsiiRol’ zapovednikov Rossii v sokhranenii i izuchenii prirody”, Ser. “Trudy Okskogo gosudarstvennogo prirodnogo biosfernogo zapovednika” (Proc. Anniv. Sci.-Pract. Conf. “The Role of Russian Reserves in the Conservation and Study of Nature”, Ser. “Proceedings of the Oksky State Natural Biosphere Reserve”), Ryazan’: Golos Gubernii, 2015, pp. 201–207.

  31. Prach, K. and Pyšek, P., How do species dominating in succession differ from others?, J. Veg. Sci., 1999, vol. 10, pp. 383–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rabotnov, T.A., Fitotsenologiya (Phytocenology), Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Madzhugina, Yu.G., Kuznetsov, Vl.V., and Shevyakova, N.I., Plants of municipal waste landfills in megacities as promising species for phytoremediation, Fiziol. Rast., 2008, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 453–463.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ulanova, N.G., Bushgrass, Biologicheskaya flora Moskovskoi oblasti (Biological Flora of the Moscow Region), Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1995. vol. 10, pp. 4–19.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lupardus, R.C., McIntosh, A.C.S., Janz, A., and Farr, D., Succession after reclamation: Identifying and assessing ecological indicators of forest recovery on reclaimed oil and natural gas well pads, Ecol. Indic., 2019, vol. 106, art. ID 105515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105515

  36. Prévosto, B., Kuiters, L., Bernhardt-Römermann, M., et al., Impacts of land abandonment on vegetation: Successional pathways in European habitats, Folia Geobot., 2011, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 303–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12224-010-9096-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Bourgeois, B., Vanasse, A., Gonzalez, E., et al., Threshold dynamics in plant succession after tree planting in agricultural riparian zones, J. Appl. Ecol., 2016, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 1704–1713. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12675

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The study was carried out within the framework of the state assignment of the Nizhny Tagil State Social Pedagogical Institute of the Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education, Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University and the Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. V. Zhuikova.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

This article does not contain any research involving humans and animals as research objects.

Additional information

Translated by M. Shulskaya

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhuikova, T.V., Meling, E.V. & Bezel, V.S. Dynamics of Projective Coverage and Species Diversity of Grass Communities During Restoration Succession on Fallows and Dumps. Russ J Ecol 53, 285–294 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1067413622040087

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1067413622040087

Keywords:

Navigation