Skip to main content

Causes of Variation in the Frequency of Polygyny in the European Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca Population of Karelia

Russian Journal of Ecology volume 49, pages 554–562 (2018)Cite this article

Abstract

Annual variation in the frequency of polygyny in the European pied flycatcher population is determined by a set of factors, with the primary factor being the sex ratio at the onset of the breeding season. The remaining factors, including individual characteristics of male and environmental conditions during this period, played a significant but secondary role. Facultative polygyny should be viewed as a mechanism to support the highest possible breeding productivity of individuals and populations, in unstable environmental conditions. It prevents an occurrence of nonbreeding females ready for mating and provides them with an opportunity to participate in breeding at a optimal time.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  1. Lundberg, A. and Alatalo, R.V., The Pied Flycatcher, London: Poyser, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Verner, J. and Willson, M.F., The influence of habitats on mating systems of North American passerine birds, Ecology, 1966, vol. 47, pp. 143–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lack, D., Ecological Adaptations for Breeding in Birds, London: Methuen, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  4. von Haartman, L., Nest-site and evolution of polygamy in European passerine birds, Ornis Fenn., 1969, vol. 46, pp. 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  5. von Haartman, L., The biological significance of the nuptial plumage of the male Pied Flycatcher, in Acta XVIII Congressus Internationalis Ornithologicus, Moscow, 1982, pp. 34–60.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wittenberger, J.F., The ecological factors selecting for polygyny in altricial birds, Am. Nat., 1976, vol. 110, pp. 779–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Møller, A.P., Mating systems among European passerines: A review, Ibis, 1986, vol. 128, pp. 234–250. doi 10.1111/j.1474-919X.1986.tb02671.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ivanitskii, V.V., Polyterritoriality and polygyny in birds: Perspectives of comparative ethological approach, Biol. Nauki, 1990, no. 8, pp. 62–71.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lifjeld, J.T. and Slagsvold, T., Female Pied Flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca choose male characteristics in homogenous habitats, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 1988, vol. 22, pp. 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00395695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Goodenough, A.E., Elliott, S.L., and Hart, A.G., Are nest sites actively chosen? Testing a common assumption for three non-resource-limited birds, Acta Oecol., 2009, vol. 35, pp. 598–602. doi 10.1016/j.actao.2009.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Potti, J. and Montalvo, S., Polygyny in Spanish Pied Flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca, Bird Study, 1993, vol. 40, pp. 31–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00063659309477126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Winkel, W., Polygynie des Trauerschnäpper (Ficedula hypoleuca) in Braunschweiger Raum, Vogelwarte, 1994, vol. 37, pp. 199–205.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dale, S. and Slagsvold, T., Mate choice on multiple cues, decision rules and sampling strategies in female Pied Flycatchers, Behaviour, 1996, vol. 133, pp. 903–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lampe, H.M. and Espmark, Y.O., Mate choice in Pied Flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca: Can females use song to find high-quality males and territories?, Ibis, 2003, vol. 145, pp. E24–E33. doi 10.1046/j.1474-919X.2003.00144.x

  15. Sirkiä, P.M. and Laaksonen, T., Distinguishing between male and territory quality: Females choose multiple traits in the Pied Flycatcher, Anim. Behav., 2009, vol. 78, pp, 1051–1060. doi 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.06.022

  16. Artemyev, A.V., Populyatsionnaya ekologiya mukholovki-pestrushki v severnoi zone areala (Population Ecology of the Pied Flycatcher in the North of the Species Range), Moscow: Nauka, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Both, C., Fitness costs of polygyny in female Pied Flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca, Ardea, 2002, vol. 90, pp. 129–138.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Canal, D., Jovani, R., and Potti, J., Multiple mating opportunities boost protandry in a Pied Flycatcher population, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 2012, vol. 66, pp. 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-011-1253-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ivanter, E.V. and Korosov, A.V., Vvedenie v kolichestvennuyu biometriyu (A Primer in Quantitative Biometry), Petrozavodsk: Petrozavodsk. Gos. Univ., 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Askenmo, C., Polygyny and nest site selection in the Pied Flycatcher, Anim. Behav., 1984, vol. 32, pp. 972–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Breiehagen, T. and Slagsvold, T., Do male Pied Flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca become polygynous because they monopolize resources of high quality?, Ornis Norvegica, 2000, vol. 23, pp. 8–23.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Winkel, W. and Winkel, D., Polygynie des Trauerschnäppers (Fcedula hypoleuca) am Westrand seines Areals in Mitteleuropa, J. Ornithol., 1984, vol. 125, pp. 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kerimov, A.B., Grin’kov, V.G., Ivankina, E.V., et al., Effect of spring temperatures on the intensity of advertising behavior and basal metabolic level in brightly and cryptically colored male Pied Flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca), Zool. Zh., 2014, vol. 93, no. 10, pp. 1288–1302. doi 10.7868/S0044513414100080

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sternberg, H., Grinkov, V., Ivankina, E.V., et al., Evaluation of the size and composition of nonbreeding surplus in a Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca population: Removal experiments in Germany and Russia, Ardea, 2002, vol. 90, pp. 461–470.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Both, C., Burger, C., Ouwehand, J., et al., Delayed age at first breeding and experimental removals show large nonbreeding surplus in Pied Flycatchers, Ardea, 2017, vol. 105, pp. 43–60. https://doi.org/10.5253/arde.v105i1.a2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Saino, N., Rubolini, D., Serra, L., et al., Sex-related variation in migration phenology in relation to sexual dimorphism: A test of competing hypotheses for the evolution of protandry, J. Evol. Biol., 2010, vol. 23, pp. 2054–2065. doi 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02068.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Slagsvold, T., Lifjeld, J.T., Stenmark, G., and Breiehagen, T., On the cost of searching for a mate in female Pied Flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca, Anim. Behav., 1988, vol. 36, pp. 433–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(88)80013-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Artemyev, A.V., Main factors determining long-term population dynamics of the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca in Karelia, Russ. Ornitol. Zh., 2017, no. 1479, pp. 3190–3202.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Newton, I., Population Limitation in Birds, London: Academic, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Payevsky, V.A., The adaptive essence of seasonal migrations: Are annual migrations of birds dangerous for them?, Zool. Zh., 1999, vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 303–310.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Both, C., Bijlsma, R.G., and Ouwehand, J., Repeatability in spring arrival dates in Pied Flycatchers varies among years and sexes, Ardea, 2016, vol. 104, pp. 3–21. doi 10.5253/arde.v104i1.a1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Meijer, T., Nienaber, U., Lancer, U., et al., Temperature and timing of egg-laying of European Starlings, Condor, 1999, vol. 101, pp. 124–132. doi 10.2307/1370453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ryabitsev, V.K., Territorial’nye otnosheniya i dinamika soobshchestv ptits v Subarktike (Territorial Relationships of Birds and Dynamics of Their Communities in the Subarctic), Yekaterinburg: Nauka, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Golovatin, M.G., Dynamics of passerine bird abundance and spatial distribution in the Subarctic: Dependence on weather, in Mnogoletnyaya dinamika chislennosti ptits i mlekopitayushchikh v svyazi s global’nymi izmeneniyami klimata: Mat-ly mezhdunar. simpoziuma (Long-term Population Dynamics of Birds and Mammals in Relation to Global Climate Change: Proc. Int. Symp.), Kazan, 2002, pp. 157–164.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Biology of the Karelian Research Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Petrozavodsk, 185610, Russia

    A. V. Artemyev

Authors
  1. A. V. Artemyev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. V. Artemyev.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © A.V. Artemyev, 2018, published in Ekologiya, 2018, No. 6, pp. 470–479.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Artemyev, A.V. Causes of Variation in the Frequency of Polygyny in the European Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca Population of Karelia. Russ J Ecol 49, 554–562 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1067413618060036

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1067413618060036

Keywords

  • bird reproduction
  • Ficedula hypoleuca
  • mating system
  • polygyny