Skip to main content

How Prey Density and Distribution Can Affect Predator Habitat Usage Pattern: a Case Study on Sand Cat (Felis margarita, Locke 1858) from Iran

Russian Journal of Ecology volume 49, pages 320–324 (2018)Cite this article

Abstract

Prey-predator relationships can affect habitat selection of the animals greatly. In the recent investigation we tried to test how rodents can affect nocturnal sand cat habitat usage pattern. Microhabitat affinities of sand cat and its den site selection were investigated in Sistan and Baluchistan Province from early 2013 to late 2015 in Semsor area. The data acquired from 29 presence plots of individuals were compared by paired non-used plots; the results indicated that the presence of Haloxylon ammodendron and relative density of rodents mainly affected Sand cat microhabitat selection. We also found that the species den site selection was mainly influenced by the presence of tall shrubs such as Haloxylon ammodendron and Tamarix sp. We concluded that the habitat selection pattern of sand cat in the study area could be significantly influenced by rodents’ microhabitat selection; however, such relationship may not be true in larger spatial scales like species home range.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  1. Cunningham, P., Status of the Sand Cat, Felis margarita, in the United Arab Emirates, Zool. Middle East, 2002, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 9–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ghafaripour, S., Naderi, M., and Rezaei, H.R., Investigating abundance, density and potential threats of Sand cat in the South-Eastern parts of Iran. J. Wildl. Biodivers., 2017, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 47–55

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schauenberg, P., Données nouvelles sur le chat des sables Felis margarita Loche, 1858, Suisse Zool., 1974, vol. 48, pp. 949–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hemmer, H., Gestation period and postnatal development in felids, in The World’s Cats, Eaton, R.L., Ed., Seattle, WA: Carnivore Research Institute, Univ. of Washington, 1976, pp. 143–165.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gasperetti, J., Harrison, D.L., and Biittiker W, The Carnivora of Arabia, Fauna of Saudi Arabia, 1986, vol. 7, pp. 397–461.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Harrison, D.L., and Bates, P.J.J., The Mammals of Arabia, 2nd ed., Sevenoaks, UK: Harrison Zoological Museum, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Abbadi, M., Israel’s elusive feline: Sand cats, Cat News, 1992, vol. 18, pp. 15–16.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dragesco-Joffe, A., Le chat des sables, un redoutable chasseur de serpents, in La Vie Sauvage du Sahara, Lausanne, Switzerland: Delachaux et Niestlé, 1993, pp. 129–133.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Heptner, V.H. and Sludskii, A.A., Mammals of the Soviet Union, vol. 3: Carnivores (Feloidea), English Transl., Hoffmann, R.S., Ed., Washington, DC: Smithsonian Inst., Natl. Science Foundation, 1992.

  10. Happold, D.C.D., Small mammals, in Key Environments: Sahara Desert, Cloudsley-Thompson, J.L., Ed., London: Pergamon, 1984, pp. 251–275.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Goodman, S.M, and Helmy, I., The sand cat Felis margarita Loche, 1858 in Egypt, Mammalia, 1986, vol. 50, pp. 120–1231.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Russell Cole, F., and Wilson, D.E., Felis margarita (Carnivora: Felidae), Mammal. Species, 2015, vol. 47, no. 924, pp. 63–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hemami, M.R., Naderi, G.H., Karami, M., and Mohammadi, S., Nocturnal activity of Iranian Jerboa Allactaga firouzi (Mammalia: Rodentia: Dipodidae), Mammalia, 2011, vol. 75, pp. 42–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Darabi, M., Zeini, Z., Karimi, A. and Kaveh, A., Nocturnal activity and habitat selection of Hotson Jerboa, Allactaga hotsoni Thomas, 1920 (Rodentia: Dipodidae). J. Wildl. Biodivers., 2017, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 33–36.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Postanowicz, R., Sand cat (Felis margarita). https://doi.org/www.lioncrusher.com/animal.asp?animal=67r.com/animal.asp?animal=67

  16. De Smet, K., The distribution and habitat choice of larger mammals in Algeria, with special reference to nature protection. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Ghent, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ferrero, D.M., Lemon, J.K., Fluegge, D., Pashkovski, S.L., Korzan, W.J., Datta, S.R., et al., Detection and avoidance of a carnivore odor by prey, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2011, vol. 108, pp. 11235–11240.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Stephens, D.W., and Charnov, E.L., Optimal foraging: Some simple stochastic models, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 1982, vol. 10, pp. 251–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Stephens, D.W., and Krebs J.R., Foraging Theory, Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Naderi, G.H., Hemami, M.H., Riazi, B., and Alesheikh, A., Notes on ecological peculiarities of Allactaga firouzi Womochel, 1978 (Mammalia: Dipodidae), Zool. Middle East, 2009, vol.47, pp. 21–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Krebs, C. J., Ecological Methodology, 2nd ed., Melo Park, CA: Addison–Wesley, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Naderi, G.H., Mohammadi, S., Imani, A., and Karami, M., Habitat selection and burrow structure of Blanford’s Jerboa, Jaculus blanfordi (Mammalia: Rodentia) from Central Desert of Iran, Acta Zool. Bulg., 2014, vol. 66, no. 2, 225–228.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Naderi, G.H, Hemami, M., Riazi, B., Alesheikh, A., Iranian Jerboa abundance and habitat selection, Ph.D. Thesis, Tehran, Iran: Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ghafaripour S., Naderi, M., Riazi, B. and Rezaei, H.R., Ecology and biology of sand cat in Sistan and Baluchistan Province, Ph.D. Thesis, Tehran, Iran: Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Murray, G.B., and Vestal, B.M., Effects of environmental structure on the burrow distribution of thirteen-lined ground squirrels, Spermophilus tridecemlineatus (Sciuridae), Southwest. Nat., 1979, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 79–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Laundre, J.W., and Appel, N.K., Habitat preferences for burrow sites of Richardson’s ground squirrels in southwestern Minnesota, Prairie Nat., 1986, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 235–239.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Naderi, Gh., Hemami, M.R., Mohammadi, S., Riazi, B., Karami, M., Kaboli, M., Alesheikh, A., Effects of vegetation and soil conditions on burrow structure and site ion of rare desert rodent Iranian jerboa (Allactaga firouzi), Pol. J. Ecol., 2011, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 403–410.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bearhop, S., Hilton, G.M., Votier, S.C., and Waldron, S., Stable isotope ratios indicate that body condition in migrating passerines is influenced by winter habitat, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci., 2004, vol. 271, no. 4, pp. 215–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Norris, D.R., Marra, P.P., Kyser, T.K., and Sherry, T.W., Tropical winter habitat limits reproductive success on the temperate breeding grounds in a migratory bird, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci., 2004, vol. 271, pp. 59–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Gunnarsson, T.G., Gill, J.A., Newton, J., Potts, P.M., and Sutherland, W.J., Seasonal etching of habitat quality and fitness in a migratory bird. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci., 2005, vol. 272, pp. 2319–2323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Charnov, E.L., Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem, Theor. Popul. Biol., 1976, vol. 9, pp. 129–136.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Fortin, D., Fryxell, J.M., O’Brodovich, L., and Frandsen, D., Foraging ecology of bison at the landscape and plant community levels: The applicability of energy maximization principles, Oecologia, 2003, vol. 134, pp. 219–227.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Comins, H.N., and Hassell, M.P., The dynamics of optimally foraging predators and parasitoids, J. Anim. Ecol., 1979, vol. 48, pp. 335–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Pyke, G.H., Optimal foraging theory: A critical review, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 1984, vol. 15, pp. 523–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ropert-Coudert, Y., Kato, A., Wilson, R.P., and Cannell, B., Foraging strategies and prey encounter rate of free-ranging little penguins, Mar. Biol., 2006, vol. 149, pp. 139–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Martínez, J.A., Serrano, D. and Zuberogoitia, I., Predictive models of habitat preferences for the Eurasian eagle owl Bubo bubo: A multiscale approach, Ecography, 2003, vol. 26, pp. 21–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ciarniello, L.M., Boyce, M.S., Seip, D.R. and Heard, D.C., Grizzly bear habitat selection is scale dependent, Ecol. Appl., 2007, vol. 17, pp. 1424–1440.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Mayor, S.J., Schaefer, J.A., Schneider, D.C., and Mahoney, S.P., Spectrum of selection: New approaches to detecting the scale-dependent response to habitat, Ecology, 2007, vol. 88, pp. 1634–1640.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Glaudas X. and Rodríguez-Robles J.A., A two-level problem: Habitat selection in relation to prey abundance in an ambush predator, the speckled rattlesnake (Crotalus mitchellii), Behavior, 2011, vol. 148, pp.1491–1524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Murúa R and González LA., Microhabitat selection in two Chilean cricetid rodents, Oecologia, 1982, vol. 52, pp. 12–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Dalmagro, A.D., and Vieira, E.M., Patterns of habitat utilization of small rodents in an area of Araucaria forest in Southern Brazil, Austral. Ecol., 2005, vol. 30, pp. 353–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Environmental Sciences, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

    S. Ghafaripour & B. Riazi

  2. Department of Environment, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Arak University, Arak, 38156-8-8349, Iran

    M. Naderi

  3. Environmental Science Department, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran

    H. R. Rezaei

Authors
  1. S. Ghafaripour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Naderi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. B. Riazi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. H. R. Rezaei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Naderi.

Additional information

The article is published in the original.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghafaripour, S., Naderi, M., Riazi, B. et al. How Prey Density and Distribution Can Affect Predator Habitat Usage Pattern: a Case Study on Sand Cat (Felis margarita, Locke 1858) from Iran. Russ J Ecol 49, 320–324 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1067413618040057

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1067413618040057

Keywords

  • prey predator relationships
  • den site selection
  • habitat selection
  • sand cat
  • Iran