Advertisement

Russian Journal of Ecology

, Volume 49, Issue 2, pp 166–171 | Cite as

Age, Survivorship and Life Expectancy in Near Eastern Fire Salamander, Salamandra infraimmaculata (Caudata: Salamandridae)

  • Abdullah Altunışık
Article
  • 47 Downloads

Abstract

Populations from different environmental habitats indicate variation in life history traits and these differences are mostly related to longevity, age and size at maturity. In this study, age structure, longevity, survivorship and sexual size dimorphism of Near Eastern fire salamander (Salamandra infraimmaculata) were assessed by means of skeletochronological analysis. Maximum lifespan was recorded to be twelve years in females and eleven years in males and age at maturity was estimated as three and four years for both sexes. Females had significantly larger SVL than that of males, while age structure and mean age did not differ between sexes. Age and body size were positively correlated with each other for both females and males. Since the populations of the Near Eastern fire salamander in Turkey are in decline, the present study which provides preliminary data on life history traits of this species could be helpful for future biological studies.

Keywords

age amphibian salamander survivorship life history sexual dimorphism Salamandridae 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Papenfuss, T., Disi, A., Rastegar-Pouyani, N., et al., Salamandra infraimmaculata, in The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, 2009: E.T59466a11927871. http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.2305/Iucn.Uk.2009.Rlts.T5946 6a11927871.En. Accessed June 16, 2016.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blank, L. and Blaustein, L., Using ecological niche modeling to predict the distributions of two endangered amphibian species in aquatic breeding site, Hydrobiologia, 2012, vol. 693, no. 1, pp. 157–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, Version 2014.3. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN, 2016.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Altunisik, A. and Özdemir, N., Life history traits in Bufotes variabilis (Pallas, 1769) from 2 different altitudes in Turkey, Turk. J. Zool., 2015, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 153–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Castanet, J., Francillon-Vieillot, H., and Bruce, R.C., Age estimation in desmognathine salamanders assessed by skeletochronology, Herpetologica, 1996, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 160–171.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Paton, D., Jurranz, A., Sequeros, E., et al., Seasonal age and sex structure of Rana perezi assessed by skeletochronology, J. Herpetol., 1991, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 389–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Krebs, C.J., Ecology, San Francisco: Benjamin Cummings, 2001.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eden, C.J., Whiteman, H.H., Duobinis-Gray, L., and Wissinger, S.A., Accuracy assessment of skeletochronology in the Arizona tiger salamander (Ambystoma tigrinum nebulosum), Copeia, 2007, vol. 2007, no. 2, pp. 471–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Caetano, M.H., Use and results of skeletochronology in some urodeles (Triturus marmoratus, Latreille 1800 and Triturus boscai, Lataste 1879), Ann. Sci. Nat. Zool., 1990, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 197–199.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Castanet, J. and Smirina, E.M., Introduction to the skeletochronological method in amphibians and reptiles, Ann. Sci. Nat. Zool., 1990, vol. 1990, no. 13, pp. 191–196.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Özdemir, N., Altunisik, A., Ergül, T., et al., Variation in body size and age structure among three Turkish populations of the tree frog Hyla arborea, Amphibia Reptilia, 2012, vol. 33, no.1, pp. 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Altunisik, A. and Özdemir, N., Body size and age structure of a highland population of Hyla orientalis Bedriaga, 1890, in Northern Turkey, Herpetozoa, 2013, vol. 26, nos. 1–2, pp. 49–55.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ergül Kalayci, T., Özdemir, N., Altunisik, A. and Gül, S., The effect of altitude, latitude and climatic variables on life-history traits of male Hyla savignyi (Audouin, 1827) from Anatolia (Turkey): A skeletochronological study (Anura: Hylidae), Herpetozoa, 2015, vol. 28, nos. 1–2, pp. 55–62.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sinsch, U., Pelster B. and Ludwig G. Large-scale variation of size-and age-related life-history traits in the common frog: A sensitive test case for macroecological rules, J. Zool., 2015, vol. 297, no. 1, pp. 32–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Warburg, M. R., The phenology of a rare salamander (Salamandra infraimmaculata) in a population breeding under unpredictable conditions: A 25-year study, Acta Herpetol., 2007, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 147–157.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Segev, O., Hill, N., Templeton, A. R. and Blaustein, L., Population size, structure and phenology of an endangered salamander at temporary and permanent breeding sites, J. Nat. Conserv., 2010, vol. 2010, no. 18, pp. 189–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Warburg, M.R., Age and size at metamorphosis of halfsib Salamandra infraimmaculata larvae born in the laboratory and raised singly under three different food regimes, Belg. J. Zool., 2009, vol. 139, no. 2, pp. 156–165.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Goldberg, T., Nevo, E. and Degani, G., Genetic diversity and different ecological conditions in Salamandra infraimmaculata larvae from various breeding sites, Anim. Biol., 2011, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 37–49.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Warburg, M.R., Age and size at metamorphosis of Salamandra infraimmaculata larvae born in the laboratory and raised under different density regimes with food ad libitum, Salamandra, 2012, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 157–165.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Warburg, M.R., Population ecology, breeding activity, longevity, and reproductive strategies of Salamandra salamandra during an 18-year-long study of an isolated population on Mt. Carmel, Israel, Mertensiella, 1994, vol. 1994, no. 4, pp. 399–421.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Warburg, M. R., Longevity in Salamandra infraimmaculata from Israel with a partial review on other salamanders, Salamandra, 2007, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 21–34.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Altunisik, A., Sexual size and shape dimorphism in the Near Eastern fire salamander, Salamandra infraimmaculata (Caudata: Salamandridae), Anim. Biol., 2017, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    http://www.mgm.gov.tr. Accessed June 03, 2016.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lovich, J. E. and Gibbons, J.W., A review of techniques for quantifying sexual size dimorphism. Growth Dev. Aging, 1992, vol. 56, no. 4, 269–281.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Olgun, K., Miaud, C. and Gautier, P., Age, growth, and survivorship in the viviparous salamander Mertensiella luschani from Southwestern Turkey, Can. J. Zool., 2001, vol. 79, no. 9, pp.1559–1567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Seber, G.A.F., The Estimation of Animal Abundance and Related Parameters, London: Griffin, 1973.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Vitt, L.J. and Caldwell, J.P., Herpetology, an Introductory Biology of Amphibians and Reptiles, Burlington, MA: Academic, 2009.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Reinhard, S., Renner, S. and Kupfer, A., Age and fecundity in Salamandra algira (Caudata: Salamandridae), Salamandra, 2015, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 19–24.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kozlowski, J. and Uchmanski, J., Optimal individual growth and reproduction in perennial species with indeterminate growth, Evol. Biol., 1987, vol. 1, pp. 214–230.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rebelo, R. and Caetano, M. H., Use of skeletochronological method for ecodemographical studies on Salamandra salamandra gallaica from Portugal, in Scientia Herpetologica, Llorente, G.A., Montori, A., Santos, X., and Carretero, M.A., Eds., Barcelona: Asociación Herpetológica Española, 1995, pp. 135–140.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Miaud, C., Andreone, F., Riberon, A., et al., Differences in age, size at maturity and gestation duration among two neighbouring populations of the Alpine salamander Salamandra lanzai, J. Zool., 2001, vol. 254, pp. 251–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kutrup, B., Bülbül, U. and Yilmaz, N., Age structure in two populations of Triturus vittatus ophryticus at different altitudes, Amphibia Reptilia, 2005, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 49–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Altunisik, A., Ergül, T., Gül, Ç., et al., A skeletochronological study of the smooth newt Lissotriton vulgaris (Amphibia: Urodela) from an island and a mainland population in Turkey, Ital. J. Zool., 2014, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 381–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Miaud, C., Guyetant, R. and Faber, H., Age, size and growth of the Alpine newt, Triturus alpestris (Urodela, Salamandridae), at high altitude and a review of lifehistory trait variation throughout its range, Herpetologica, 2000, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 135–144.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gümüs Özcan, Ç. and Üzüm, N., Body size and age in three populations of the northern banded newt Ommatotriton ophryticus (Berthold, 1846) from Turkey, Turk. J. Zool., 2015, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 672–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Shine, R., Sexual selection and sexual dimorphism in the Amphibia, Copeia, 1979, vol. 1979, no. 2, pp. 297–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kupfer, A., Sexual size dimorphism in amphibians: An overview, in Sex, Size and Gender Roles: Evolutionary Studies of Sexual Size Dimorphism, Fairbairn, D.J., Blanckenhorn, W.U., and Szèkely, T., Eds., New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 2007, pp. 50–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Reinhard, S., Renner, S. and Kupfer, A., Sexual dimorphism and age of Mediterranean salamanders, Zoology, 2015, vol. 118, no. 1, pp. 19–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Malmgren, J.C. and Thollesson, M., Sexual size and shape dimorphism in two species of newts, Triturus cristatus and T. vulgaris (Caudata: Salamandridae), J. Zool., 1999, vol. 249, no. 2, pp. 127–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Olgun, K., Üzüm, N., Avci A. and Miaud, C., Age, size and growth of the southern crested newt Triturus karelinii (Strauch 1870) in a population from Bozdag (Western Turkey), Amphibia Reptilia, 2005, vol. 26, pp. 223–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bovero, S., Sotgiu, G., Castellano, S. and Giacoma, C., Age and sexual dimorphism in a population of Euproctus platycephalus (Caudata: Salamandridae) from Sardinia, Copeia, 2003, vol. 2003, no. 1, pp. 149–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Üzüm, N., A skeletochronological study of age, growth and longevity in apopulation of the Caucasian Salamander, Mertensiella caucasica (Waga 1876) (Caudata: Salamandridae) from Turkey, North-West. J. Zool., 2009, vol. 5, no.1, pp. 74–84.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Shine, R., The evolution of large body size in females: A critique of Darwin’s fecundity advantage model, Am. Nat., 1988, vol. 131, no.1, pp. 124–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Blanckenhorn, W.U., Behavioural causes and consequences of sexual sizedimorphism, Ethology, 2005, vol. 111, no. 11, pp. 977–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Liao, W.B., Liu, W.C. and Merila, J., Andrew meets Rensch: Sexual size dimorphism and the inverse of Rensch’s rule in Andrew’s toad (Bufo andrewsi), Oecologia, 2015, vol. 177, pp. 389–399.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Biology DepartmentRecep Tayyip Erdoğan UniversityRizeTurkey

Personalised recommendations