Advertisement

Russian Journal of Ecology

, Volume 46, Issue 6, pp 564–572 | Cite as

Heavy metals in the mother–placenta–fetus system in bank voles under conditions of environmental pollution from copper plant emissions

  • S. V. MukhachevaEmail author
  • V. S. Bezel’
Article

Abstract

Accumulation of heavy metals (Cu, Zn, Cd, and Pb) in the mother–placenta–fetus system has been studied in small mammals (based on a case study of bank voles) living under conditions of environmental pollution from copper production emissions (Middle Ural). The role of gastrointestinal and placental barriers has been assessed in translocation of the studied elements from pregnant female diets to embryos. It has been shown that, with existing environmental pollution levels, the entry of toxicants into the organisms of female individuals does not necessarily lead to significant fetal losses during pregnancy, but it may affect the quality of progeny and its vital capacity in the early postnatal period.

Keywords

small mammals industrial pollution heavy metals embryo placenta copper smelter Middle Urals 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amaya, E., Gil, F., Freire, C., et al., Placental concentrations of heavy metals in a mother-child cohort, Environ. Res, 2013, vol. 120, pp. 120–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baranowska, I., Lead and cadmium in human placentas and maternal and neonatal blood in heavily polluted area, measured by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry, Occup. Environ. Med., 1995, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 229–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benitez, M.A., Mendez-Armenta, M., Montes, S., et al., Mother–fetus transference of lead and cadmium in rats: Involvement of metallothionein, Histol. Histopathol., 2009, vol. 24, pp. 24–1523.Google Scholar
  4. Bezel, V.S., Belskii, E.A., and Mukhacheva, S.V., On the problem of variability in reproductive parameters of animal populations under toxic pollution of the environment, Russ. J. Ecol., 1998, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 186–191.Google Scholar
  5. Bezel, V.S., Kutsenogii, K.P., Mukhacheva, S.V., et al., Elemental composition of the diets and tissues of small mammals at different trophic levels as a biological indicator of chemical pollution of the environment, Chemistry for Sustainable Development, 2007, no. 1, pp. 1–33.Google Scholar
  6. Diaz-Barriga, F., Carrizeles, L., Calderon, J., et al., Measurement of placental levels of arsenic, lead and cadmium as a biomarker of exposure to mixtures, in Biomonitors and Biomarkers as Indicators of Environmental Change, New York: Plenum, 1995, pp. 139–148.Google Scholar
  7. Dinerman, A.A., Rol’ zagryaznitelei okruzhayushchei sredy v narushenii embrional’nogo razvitiya (The Role of Environmental Pollutants in Disturbances of Embryonic Development), Moscow: Meditsina, 1980.Google Scholar
  8. Domingo, J.L., Metal-induced developmental toxicity in mammals: A review, J. Toxic. Environ. Health: Current Issues, 1994, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 123–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Iyengar, G.V. and Rapp, A., Human placenta as a ‘dual’ biomarker for monitoring fetal and maternal environment, with special reference to potentially toxic trace elements: Part 3. Toxic trace elements in placenta and placenta as a biomarker for these elements, Sci. Tot. Environ., 2001, vol. 280, pp. 280–221.Google Scholar
  10. Lindsay, Y., Duthie, L.M., and Mcardle, H., Zinc levels in the rat fetal liver are not determined by transport across the placental microvillar membrane or the fatal liver plasma membrane, Biol. Reprod., 1994, no. 51, pp. 51–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Loiacono, N.J., Graziano, J.H., Kline, J.K., et al., Placental cadmium and birthweight in women living near a lead smelter, Arch. Environ. Health, 1992, vol. 47, pp. 47–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mirzoev, E.B., Kobyako, V.O., Gubina, O.A., and Frolova, N.A., Responses of F1 rats to chronic exposure to small doses of cadmium in the antenatal period of development, Toksik. Vestn., 2014, no. 4, pp. 4–29.Google Scholar
  13. Mogil’naya, G.M. and Mogil’nyi, V.L., The gastrointestinal protective barrier, Morfologiya, 2007, no. 6, pp. 6–9.Google Scholar
  14. Moskvitina, N.S., Kuranova, V.N., and Savel’ev, S.V., Disturbances of embryonic development in vertebrates under conditions of technogenic environmental pollution, Sib. Ekol. Zh., 2011, no. 4, pp. 4–489.Google Scholar
  15. Mukhacheva, S.V., Bank vole population reproduction in a gradient of technogenic environmental pollution, Zool. Zh., 2001, vol. 80, no. 12, pp. 1509–1517.Google Scholar
  16. Mukhacheva, S.V., Spatiotemporal population structure of the bank vole in a gradient of technogenic environmental pollution, Russ. J. Ecol., 2007, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 161–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mukhacheva, S.V., and Bezel, V.S., Levels of toxic elements and functional structure in population of small mammals under conditions of technogenic pollution (with reference to the bank vole), Russ. J. Ecol., 1995, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 212–215.Google Scholar
  18. Nesterkova, D.V., Vorobeichik, E.L., and Reznichenko, I.S., The effect of heavy metals on the soil–earthworm–european mole food chain under the conditions of environmental pollution caused by the emissions of a copper smelting plant, Sib. Ekol. Zh., 2014, no. 5, pp. 5–777.Google Scholar
  19. Osman, K., Akesson, A., Berglund, M., et al., Toxic and essential elements in placentas of Swedish women, Clin. Biochem., 2000. vol. 33, p. 131–138.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Salomeina, N.V. and Mashak, S.V., Structural bases of mother–fetus relationships under chemical impact during embryonic development, Med. Obraz. Sibiri, 2012, no. 1, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
  21. Shvarts, S.S., Ekologicheskie zakonomernosti evolyutsii (Ecological Patterns of Evolution), Moscow: Nauka, 1980.Google Scholar
  22. Stawarz, R., Formcki, G., Chrobaczynska, M., et al., Accumulation of cadmium and lead in placenta and amnion of women from upper Silesian region, Poland, J. Environ. Res. Dev., 2011, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 871–879.Google Scholar
  23. Talmage, S.S. and Walton, B.T., Small mammals as monitors of environmental contaminants, Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 1991, vol. 119, pp. 119–47.Google Scholar
  24. Thompson, J. and Bannigan, J., Cadmium: Toxic effects on the reproductive system and the embryo, Reprod. Toxicol., 2008, vol. 25, pp. 25–304.Google Scholar
  25. Trubina, M.R., Vorobeichik, E.L., Khantemirova, E.V., et al., Dynamics of forest vegetation after the reduction of industrial emissions: Fast recovery or continued degradation?, Dokl. Biol. Sci., 2014, vol. 458, pp. 458–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Truska, P., Rosival, L., Balazova, G., et al., Blood and placental concentrations of cadmium, lead and mercury in mother and their newborns, J. Hyg. Epidemiol. Microbiol. Immunol., 1989, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 141–147.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Tupikova, N.V., Analysis of reproduction and age composition of small mammal populations, in Metody izucheniya prirodnykh ochagov boleznei cheloveka (Methods of Studies on Natural Foci of Human Diseases), Moscow: Meditsina, 1964, pp. 154–191Google Scholar
  28. Vorobeichik, E.L., Sadykov, O.F., and Farafontov, M.G., Ekologicheskoe normirovanie tekhnogennykh zagryaznenii ekosistem (lokal’nyi uroven’) (Ecological Rating of Technogenic Pollutants in Ecosystems: Local Level), Yekaterinburg: Nauka, 1994.Google Scholar
  29. Ward, N.I., Watson, R., and Bryce-Smith, D., Placental element levels in relation to fetal development for obstetrically ‘normal’ births: A study of 37 elements. Evidence for effects of cadmium, lead and zinc on fetal growth, and for smoking as a source of cadmium, J. Biosoc. Res., 1987, no. 9, pp. 9–63.Google Scholar
  30. Zakrzewska, M., Bialoriska, D., and Sawicka-Kapusta, K., Cadmium accumulation in fetus and placenta of bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus), Bull. Environ. Contam., 2002, no. 69, pp. 69–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zakrzewska, M., Effect of lead on postnatal development of the bank vole (Clethrionomys glareolus), Arch. Envoron. Contam. Toxicol., 1988, no. 17, pp. 17–365.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology, Ural BranchRussian Academy of SciencesYekaterinburgRussia

Personalised recommendations