Russian Journal of Ecology

, Volume 44, Issue 3, pp 251–259 | Cite as

Morphological relationships of the Wheatears (genus Oenanthe)

  • Mohammad Kaboli
  • Mansour Aliabadian
  • Atefeh Chamani
  • Eric Pasquet
  • Roger Prodon


The genus Oenanthe comprises approximately 22 species, of which 16 species are restricted to the desert belt of the Palaearctic and Afrotropic regions, where they are often the most conspicuous passerines. Although they have been the subjects of some morphological and ecological studies, no complete morphometrical data has been used to verify their taxonomic relationships, and, the species relationships are still debated. Overall morphometrical similarities between Wheatears and their relationships in size and shape were assessed using measurements of 27 biometrical variables on 417 museum specimens. The 22 Wheatear species comprise some morphological groups: long migratory vegetation-tolerant species (O. pleschanka, O. hispanica, O. cypriaca and O. deserti), ground-dwelling migratory (O. isabellina and O. oenanthe), and sedentary (O. bottae, O. heuglini and O. pileata) of steppe-like habitants, relatively heavy and rock-dwelling species (O. leucura and O. monticola), inhabiting the most arid areas (O. monacha, O. leucopyga and O. alboniger), and finally a central core of medium-sized partial migrants, largely overlapping in morphometric space, that do not present any evident specialization (O. lugens, O. chrysopygia, O. xanthoprymna and O. finschii). It seems Wheatear species are well distributed in a morpho-space of size and shape with moderate overlaps and few hiatuses corresponding to a morphological continuum of species. Furthermore, our results largely hiatuses corresponding to a morphological continuum of species. Furthermore, our results largely differ from previous phylogenetic hypotheses (based on ecological, behavioural, and chromatic characters), but, are in congruence with molecular data.


Oenanthe Wheatears morphological similarities/dissimilarities phylogeny 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aliabadian, M., Roselaar, C.S., Nijman, V., Sluys, R., and Vences, M., Identifying contact zone hotspots of passerine birds in the Palaearctic Region, Biol. Lett., 2005, vol. 1, pp. 21–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aliabadian, M., Kaboli, M., Prodon, R., Nijman, V., and Vences, M., Phylogeny of Palaearctic Wheatears (genus Oenanthe): Congruence between morphometric and molecular data, Mol. Phyl. Evol., 2007, vol. 42, pp. 665–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barluenga, M., Moreno, E., and Barbosa, A., Foraging behaviour of subordinate Great Tits (Parus major): Can morphology reduce the cost of subordination?, Ethology, 2001, vol. 107, pp. 877–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Collar, N., Family Turdidae (thrushes), in Del Hoyo, J., Elliot, A., Christie, D.A. Eds., Handbook of the Birds of the World, 2005, vol. 10. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions. p. 514–807.Google Scholar
  5. Cornwallis, L., The comparative ecology of eleven species of Wheatear (Genus Oenanthe) in S.W. Iran, Doctoral (Biol.) Dissertation, University of Oxford, 1975.Google Scholar
  6. Cramp, S. (Ed.), The Birds of the Western Palearctic, vol. 5, Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 1988.Google Scholar
  7. Del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A., and Christie, D.A., Handbook of the Birds of the World, vol.10, Barcelona: Lynx Edicions, 2005.Google Scholar
  8. Dementiev, G.P., Gladkov, N.A., Blagosklonov, K.N., Meklenburtsev, R.N., Ptushenko, E., Rustamov, A.K., Shtegman, B.K., Spangenberg, E.P., Sudilovskaya, A.M., and Volchanetskii, I.B., Birds of the Soviet Union, vol.6, Jerusalem: Israel Program for Scientific Translation, 1968.Google Scholar
  9. Dickinson, E.C. (Ed.), The Howard and Moore Complete Checklist of the Birds of the World, London: Christopher Helm, 2003.Google Scholar
  10. Förschler, M.I., Randler, C., Dierschke, J., and Bairlein, F., Morphometric diagnosability of Cyprus Wheatears Oenanthe cypriaca and an unexpected occurrence on Helgoland Island, Bird Study, 2010a, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 396–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Förschler, M.I., Khoury, F., Bairlein, F., and Aliabadian, M., Phylogeny of the Mourning Wheatear Oenanthe lugens complex, Mol. Phyl. Evol., 2010b, 56, pp. 758–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gaston, A.J., Adaptation in the genus Phylloscopus, Ibis, 1974, vol. 116, pp. 432–450.Google Scholar
  13. Grabovsky, V.I. and Panov, E.N., Song convergence in Pied Wheatear (Oenanthe pleschanka) and Black-eared Wheatear (O. hispanica) in secondary contact zones, Zool. Zh., 1992, vol. 71, pp. 75–84.Google Scholar
  14. Haffer, J., Secondary contact zones of birds in northern Iran, Bonn Zool. Monogr, 1977, vol. 10, pp. 1–41.Google Scholar
  15. Haffer, J., Gattung Oenanthe, in Handbuch der Vögel Mitteleuropas, vol. 11/1: Passeriformes, Glutz von Blotzheim, U.N. and Bauer, K.M., Eds., Wiesbaden, 1988.Google Scholar
  16. Hall, B.P. and Moreau, R.E., An Atlas of Speciation in African Passerine Birds, London: Straker Bros., 1970.Google Scholar
  17. Ivanitzky, V.B., Interspecific relations of sympatric species of Wheatears (Oenanthe, Turdidae, Passeriformes): 2. Behavioural aspects of coexistence in closely related species, Zool. Zh., 1980, vol. 59, pp. 739–749.Google Scholar
  18. Kaboli, M., Aliabadian, M., Guillaumet, A., Roselaar, K.S., and Prodon, R., Ecomorphology of the Wheatears (genus Oenanthe), Ibis, 2007, vol. 149, pp. 792–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Landmann, A. and Winding, N., Adaptative radiation and resource partitioning in Himalayan high-altitude finches, Zool Anal. Complex Syst., 1995, vol. 99, pp. 8–20.Google Scholar
  20. Leisler, B, Morphological aspect of ecological specialization in bird genera, Ökol, Vögel. (Ecology of Birds), 1980, vol. 2, pp. 199–220.Google Scholar
  21. Leisler, B. and Thaler, E., Differences in morphology and foraging behaviour in the Goldcrest Regulus regulus and Firecrest R. Ignicapillus, Ann. Zool. Fenn., 1982, vol. 19, pp. 285–295.Google Scholar
  22. Lipscomb, D., Platnick, N., and Wheeler, Q., The intellectual content of taxonomy: A comment on DNA taxonomy, Trends Ecol. Evol., 2003, vol. 18, pp. 65–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Loskot, V.M., On the systematic position of Black-eared Wheatear O. hispanica and Pied Wheatear O. pleschanka, Sb. Tr. Zool. Muz., 1976, vol. 36, pp. 84–89.Google Scholar
  24. Loskot, V.M., Biology of Oriental Black-eared Wheatear Oenanthe hispanica melanoleuca, Zool. Zh., 1983, vol. 116, pp. 79–107.Google Scholar
  25. Mallet, J. and Willmott, K., Taxonomy: Renaissance or Tower of Babel?, Trends Ecol. Evol., 2003, vol. 18, pp. 57–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Marchetti, K., Price, T., and Richman, A., Correlates of wing morphology with foraging behaviour and migration distance in the genus Phylloscopus, J. Avian Biol., 1995, vol. 26, pp. 177–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mayr, E. and Stresemann, E., Polymorphism in the Chat genus Oenanthe (Aves), Evolution, 1950, vol. 4, pp. 291–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McCarthy, E.M., Handbook of Avian Hybrids of the World, New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 2006.Google Scholar
  29. Outlaw, R.K., Voelker, G., and Bowie, R.C.K., Shall we chat? Evolutionary relationships in the genus Cercomela (Muscicapidae) and its relation to Oenanthe reveals extensive polyphyly among chats distributed in Africa, India, and the Palearctic, Mol. Phyl. Evol., 2010, vol. 55, pp. 284–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Panov, E.N., Wheatears of the Palaearctic: Ecology, Behaviour and Evolution of the Genus Oenanthe, Moscow: Pensoft, 2005.Google Scholar
  31. Panov, E.N. and Ivanitzky, V.V., Evolutionary and taxonomic relation between Black-eared Wheatear Oenanthe hispanica and Pied Wheatear Oenanthe pleschanka, Zool. Zh., 1975, vol. 54, pp. 1860–1873.Google Scholar
  32. Potapova, E.G. and Panov, E.N., Structural patterns of jaw apparatus in Wheatears of the genus Oenanthe, with special reference to the ways of decrease of food competition between closely related species, Zool. Zh., 1977, vol. 56, pp. 743–752.Google Scholar
  33. Randler, C., Teichmann, C., and Pentzold, S., Breeding habitat preference and foraging of the Cyprus Wheatear Oenanthe cypriaca and niche partitioning in comparison with migrant Oenanthe species on Cyprus, J. Ornithol., 2009, vol. 151, pp. 113–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Roselaar, C.S., Plumage, bare parts, moults, measurements, weights, structure, and geographical variation, in Cramp, S., Ed. Handbook of the Birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1988, vol. 5, pp. 756–885.Google Scholar
  35. Schon, M., On the evolution of the northern and southern group of subspecies in the Great Grey Shrike superspecies (Lanius excubitor), in Shrikes of the World II: Conservation Implementation, vol. 7, Yosef, R. and Lohrer, F.E., Eds., Eilat, Israel: International Birdwatching Centre, 1998, pp. 9–13.Google Scholar
  36. Seberg, O., Petersen, G., Humphries, C., Knapp, S., Stevenson, D.W., Scharff, N., and Andersen, N.M., Shortcuts in systematics? A commentary on DNA-based taxonomy, Trends Ecol. Evol., 2003, vol. 18, pp. 63–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Svensson, L., Identification Guide to European Passerines, Stockholm: Lars Svensson, 1992.Google Scholar
  38. Tye, A., Clinal variation and subspeciation in the Whitecrowned Black Wheatear Oenanthe leucopyga, Bull. Br. Ornithol. Club, 1987, vol. 170, pp. 157–165.Google Scholar
  39. Tye, A., Superspecies in the genus Oenanthe (Aves, Turdidae), Bonn Zool. Beitr., 1989, vol. 40, pp. 165–182.Google Scholar
  40. Vaurie, C., Notes on the Bird Genus Oenanthe in Persia, Afghanistan, and India, American Museum of Natural History, 1949, Novit. no. 1425.Google Scholar
  41. Will, K.W. and Rubinoff, D., Myth of the molecule: DNA barcodes for species cannot replace morphology for identification and classification, Cladistics, 2004, vol. 20, pp. 47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yom-Tov, Y., Global warming and body mass decline in Israeli passerine birds, Proc. Roy. Soc. London B, 2001, vol. 268, pp. 947–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohammad Kaboli
    • 1
  • Mansour Aliabadian
    • 2
  • Atefeh Chamani
    • 3
  • Eric Pasquet
    • 4
  • Roger Prodon
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Natural ResourcesUniversity of TehranTehranIran
  2. 2.Departments of Biology, Faculty of ScienceFerdowsi University of MashhadMashhadIran
  3. 3.Department of Environment, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural ResourcesKhorasgan(Isfahan) Branch, Islamic Azad UniversityIsfahanIran
  4. 4.Laboratoire de Zoologie Mammiféres et OiseauxMuséum National d’Histoire NaturelleParisFrance
  5. 5.Laboratoire Ecologie et Biogéogiaphie des Vertébrés (EPHE)Centre d’Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, UMR 5175Montpellier cedex 5France

Personalised recommendations