, Volume 61, Issue 1, pp 61–65 | Cite as

Optimization of Liquid Scintillation Counter for Tritium Estimation in Water Samples

  • B. Arun
  • I. Vijayalakshmi
  • K. Sivasubramanian
  • M. T. JoseEmail author


The liquid scintillation counting procedure for tritium quantification in environmental samples was optimized with respect to sample to cocktail volume ratio, fixing of region of interest of tritium spectra, and choice of counting vials for measurement of low-level activities of tritium in water samples. The optimum sample to cocktail ratio for Aqua-light scintillation cocktail based on the MDA values was found to be 8: 12 mL. The optimum window for tritium at optimum sample to cocktail ratio was found to be 2–12 keV based on figure of merit values, and the reduction in the background count rate was 31% compared to full window. The efficiency of the system at optimum sample to cocktail ratio was studied using two different quenching agents, carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) and nitromethane at different quench levels. It was found that quench effects were stronger for the standards with nitromethane compared to CCl4 at any specific volume. The tritium recovery factor for distillation technique, which is used for removing quenching agents present in water samples, was found to be 95% with the relative standard deviation of 0.34%. The conditions established in this paper are useful for measurement of low-level activities of tritium in the environmental samples.


tritium MDA quench factor liquid scintillation counter 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Knoll, G.F., Radiation Measurement and Detection, New York: Wiley, 2009, 3rd ed.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Be, M.-M, Chiste, V., and Dersch, R., Radioactive Half-Lives—Table of Recommended Values, Laboratoire National Henri Becquerel, 2008.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Management of waste containing tritium and carbon, Tech. Rep. Ser., Vienna: IAEA, 2004, no. 421.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Noakes, J. E. and De Filippis, S., in 2nd Int. Seminar for LSA, Tokyo: Packard, Tokyo, 1988, p. 123.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pujol, Ll. and Sanchez-Cabeza, J.A., J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 1999, vol. 242, no. 2, pp. 391–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jakonić, I., Todorović, N., Nikolov, J., et al., Radiat. Phys. Chem., 2014, vol. 98, pp. 69–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Water quality: determination of tritium activity concentration, liquid scintillation counting method, ISO 9698, ISO, 2010, 2nd ed.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Varlam, C., Faurescu, I., Vagner, I., et al., J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 2015, vol. 303, pp. 789–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Quantasmart for the Tricarb Liquid Scintillation Analyzer: Reference Manual 7000020, Rev. D, Perkin Elmer, 2003.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Edler, R., Available Quench Parameters in TriCarb LSC’s, LSC Application Note, Rodgau-Jügesheim: Perkin Elmer.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    L’Annunziata, M.F. and Kessler, M.J., Handbook of Radioactivity Analysis, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2012, 3rd ed.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Currie, L.A., Anal. Chem., 1968, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 586–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Inc. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Arun
    • 1
    • 2
  • I. Vijayalakshmi
    • 1
  • K. Sivasubramanian
    • 1
  • M. T. Jose
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Radiological Safety DivisionIndira Gandhi Centre for Atomic ResearchKalpakkamIndia
  2. 2.Homi Bhabha National InstituteIndira Gandhi Centre for Atomic ResearchKalpakkamIndia

Personalised recommendations