Skip to main content
Log in

Machine Learning As a Tool to Accelerate the Search for New Materials for Metal-Ion Batteries

  • Published:
Doklady Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The search for new solid ionic conductors is an important topic of material science that requires significant resources, but can be accelerated using machine learning (ML) techniques. In this work, ML methods were applied to predict the migration energy of working ions. The training set is based on data on 225 lithium ion migration channels in 23 ion conductors. The descriptors were the parameters of free space in the crystal obtained by the Voronoi partitioning method. The accuracy of migration energy prediction was evaluated by comparison with the data obtained by the density functional theory method. Two methods of ML were applied in the work: support vector regression and ordinal regression. It is shown that the parameters of free space in a crystal correlate with the migration energy, while the best results are obtained by ordinal regression. The developed ML models can be used as an additional filter in the analysis of ionic conductivity in solids.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

REFERENCES

  1. A. A. Kabanov et al., “Computational design of materials for metal-ion batteries,” in Comprehensive Inorganic Chemistry III, Ed. by J. Reedijk and K. R. Poeppelmeier, 3rd ed. (Elsevier, Oxford, 2023), pp. 404–429.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. D. Sendek et al., “Machine learning-assisted discovery of solid Li-ion conducting materials,” Chem. Mater. 31 (2), 342–352 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. C. E. Carraher, “Columns: General topics,” Polym. News 30 (5), 155–157 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. C. Lv et al., “Machine learning: An advanced platform for materials development and state prediction in lithium-ion batteries,” Adv. Mater. 34 (25), 2101474 (2022).

  5. T. Martynec et al., “Machine learning predictions of surface migration barriers in nucleation and non-equilibrium growth,” Commun. Mater. 2 (1), 90 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. S. J. Honrao et al., “Discovery of novel Li SSE and anode coatings using interpretable machine learning and high-throughput multi-property screening,” Sci. Rep. 11 (1), 16484 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. A. P. Shevchenko et al., “Mining knowledge from crystal structures: Oxidation states of oxygen-coordinated metal atoms in ionic and coordination compounds,” J. Chem. Inf. Model. 62 (10), 2332–2340 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. N. Kireeva and V. S. Pervov, “Materials space of solid-state electrolytes: Unraveling chemical composition-structure-ionic conductivity relationships in garnet-type metal oxides using cheminformatics virtual screening approaches,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19 (31), 20904–20918 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Q. Zhao et al., “Machine learning prediction of activation energy in cubic Li-argyrodites with hierarchically encoding crystal structure-based (HECS) descriptors,” Sci. Bull. 66 (14), 1401–1408 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. L. Zhang et al., “A database of ionic transport characteristics for over 29 000 inorganic compounds,” Adv. Funct. Mater. 30 (35), 2003087 (2020).

  11. V. A. Blatov, A. P. Shevchenko, and D. M. Proserpio, “Applied topological analysis of crystal structures with the program package ToposPro,” Cryst. Growth Des. 14 (7), 3576–3586 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Y. A. Morkhova et al., “Computational search for novel Zn-ion conductors—a crystallochemical, bond valence, and density functional study,” J. Phys. Chem. C 125 (32), 17590–17599 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. F. Pedregosa et al., “Scikit-Learn: Machine learning in Python,” J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. A. J. Smola and B. Scholkoph, “A tutorial on support vector regression,” Stat. Comput. 14, 199–222 (2004).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. C. V. Ananth and D. G. Kleinbaum, “Regression models for ordinal responses: A review of methods and applications,” Int. J. Epidemiol. 26 (6), 1323–1333 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Z. Niu et al., “Ordinal regression with multiple output CNN for age estimation,” in Proceedings of 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2016), pp. 4920–4928.

  17. L. Li and H. T. Lin, “Ordinal regression by extended binary classification,” NIPS 2006 Proceedings of the 19th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (2006), pp. 865–872.

  18. Y. Zhang and Y. Yang, “Cross-validation for selecting a model selection procedure,” J. Econometrics 187 (1), 95–112 (2015).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. G. Guo et al., “KNN model-based approach in classification,” Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2888, 986–996 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. G. R. Gardiner and M. S. Islam, “Anti-site defects and ion migration in the LiFe0.5Mn0.5PO4 mixed-metal cathode material,” Chem. Mater. 22, 1242–1248 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. D. Morgan, A. Ven, and G. Ceder, “Li conductivity in LixMPO4 (M = Mn, Fe, Co, Ni) olivine materials,” Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 7, A30 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. J.-J. Li, Y. Dai, and J.-C. Zheng, “Strain engineering of ion migration in LiCoO2,” Front. Phys. 17 (1), 13503 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. A. R. Armstrong et al., “Structure and lithium transport pathways in Li2FeSiO4 cathodes for lithium batteries,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133 (33), 13031–13035 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. M. S. Islam et al., “Atomic-scale investigation of defects, dopants, and lithium transport in the LiFePO4 olivine-type battery material,” Chem. Mater. 17 (20), 5085–5092 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The research was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project no. 19-73-10026.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. T. Osipov.

Ethics declarations

The authors of this work declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note.

Pleiades Publishing remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

APPENDIX

APPENDIX

Table 3. List of solid ionic conductors with Li+ as working ion, the data for which was used to train ML models
Table 4. Hyperparameters of binary classifiers of the ordinal regression model. C is the regularization parameter, n is the degree of the polynomial kernel, coef0 is the weight parameter responsible for the influence of high-degree polynomials on the result, Accuracy is the accuracy of the classifier estimated by the cross-validation method
Table 5. Hyperparameters of the SVR model. C is the regularization parameter, n means the degree of the kernel polynomial, and ε is the gap width

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Osipov, V.T., Gongola, M.I., Morkhova, Y.A. et al. Machine Learning As a Tool to Accelerate the Search for New Materials for Metal-Ion Batteries. Dokl. Math. 108 (Suppl 2), S476–S483 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064562423701612

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064562423701612

Keywords:

Navigation