Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Expanded Personality As the Main Entity and Subject of Philosophical Analysis: Implications for Education

  • MATHEMATICS
  • Published:
Doklady Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

REFERENCES

  1. Gathering Strength, Gathering Storms: The One Hundred Year Study on Artificial Intelligence (AI100) 2021 Study Panel Report. https://ai100.stanford.edu/sites/g/files/sbiybj18871/files/media/file/AI100Report_MT_10.pdf

  2. L. S. Vygotsky, “The instrumental method in psycho-logy,” in Collected Works in Six Volumes (Pedagogika, Moscow, 1982), Vol. 1 [in Russian]. http://elib.gnpbu.ru/text/vygotsky_ss-v-6tt_t1_1982/ go,108;fs,1

  3. L. S. Vygotsky, “The instrumental method in psychology” (1981). https://www.marxists.org/archive/vygotsky/works/ 1930/instrumental.htm

  4. L. S. Vygotsky, Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes (Harvard Univ. Press, Harvard, 1980).

  5. Plato, Phaedrus, 274c–275b. Collected Works in Four Volumes (Mysl’, Moscow, 1971), Vol. 3, pp. 455–542 [in Russian]. http://psylib.org.ua/books/plato01/27timei.htm

  6. A. Clark, Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again (MIT Press, 1998). http://www2.econ.iastate.edu/tesfatsi/BeingThere.AClark1998.EntireBook.pdf

  7. M. Serres, Petite Poucette (Pommier, Paris, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  8. The holy defenders of Zurich Felix, Regula and Exuperantius. https://farm1.staticflickr.com/272/20180532756_ ec91196301_o.jpg

  9. M. de Montaigne, Les Essais (Gallimard, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tikhon (Shevkunov), “Wait a minute, we’ll google! Does Generation.ru need classics?” Rossiiskaya Gazeta, Mar. 21 (2017). https://rg.ru/2017/03/21/nuzhna-li-klassika-pokoleniiu-ru.html https://vimeo.com/208770296

  11. W. J. Ong, Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word (Methuen, London, 1982).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. M. McLuhan and Q. Fiore, The Medium Is the Massage (Bantan Books, New York, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. R. Efimov, “Philosophical and methodological foundations of post-Turing intelligent robotics,” Candidate’s Dissertation in Philosophy (Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 2020). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/ 354852599_Filosofsko-metodologiceskie_osnovy_postturingovoj_ intellektualnoj_robototehniki

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Efimov, “Passing through Turing’s wall,” Troitskii Variant–Nauka, Jun. 15 (2021). https://elementy.ru/nauchno-populyarnaya_biblioteka/435993/Proyti_cherez_stenu_Tyuringa

  15. A. Mashukova, “Speaking philosopher.” https://story.ru/istorii-znamenitostej/legenda/govoryashchiy-filosof/

  16. J. Derrida, Le problème de la genèse dans la philosophie de Husserl (Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. P. Ershov, “Programming: The second literacy,” Proceedings of the 3rd World Conference on Computer Education WCCE81 (Lausanne, Switzerland, 1981), pp. 1–17.

  18. S. Papert, Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas (Basic Books, New York, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Charter for the Digital Way of School. https://rffi.1sept.ru/document/charter/eng.

  20. Squirrel AI Learning. 1st AI-powered adaptive education provider in China. http://squirrelai.com/

  21. A. Asmolov and M. Guseltseva, “Education as a space of opportunities: From human capital to human potential,” Eur. Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci. (online) 64 (6), 40–45 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. A. G. Asmolov, “Race for the future: ‘…Now Here Comes What’s Next’,” Russ. Educ. Soc. 60 (5), 381–391 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. The concept of teaching the Russian language and literature in the Russian Federation. Approved by the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation on April 9, 2016. http://static.government.ru/media/files/ GG2TF4pq6RkGAtAIJKHYKTXDmFlMAAOd.pdf

  24. Order No. 373 of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation of October 6, 2009, “On approval and introduction of the federal state educational standard of elementary general education.” http://base.garant.ru/197127/

  25. National Corpus of the Russian Language. https://ruscorpora.ru/new

  26. L. Arachashvili, “I knew that my salary would be low. And I do not complain, but work,” Mel Platform (2019). https://mel.fm/ucheba/uchitelya/416782-teacher_of_russia_2019

  27. Teacher of the Year of Russia: All-Russia Competition. https://teacher-of-russia.ru/index2018.php?page=winners18

  28. T. Pavlovskaya, “Shagallov’s lessons. The best teacher of Russia is convinced: You should read classics, feeling the rustling of the pages,” Rossiiskaya Gazeta, Oct. 17 (2016). https://rg.ru/2016/10/17/reg-ufo/uchitel-goda-shagalov-klassikov-nado-chitat-oshchushchaia-shelest-stranic.html

  29. A. Afanasyev, “Digitalization of education: All disadvantages of e-school. What will happen to the children?” (2018). https://vc.ru/flood/43800-cifrovizaciya-obrazovaniya-vse-minusy-elektronnoy-shkoly-chto-budet-s-detmi

  30. A. Afanasyev, “They will destroy this world: The frightening generation Z,” RIA Novosti, Jan. 7 (2020). https://ria.ru/20200107/1562255259.html

  31. Letter from the Ministry of Education of the RSFSR No. 81-M of April 25, 1958, “On the use of automatic pens by pupils of general schools.” http://gospismo.ru/library/pisma-ussr/sssrpismo_32/

  32. “On the use of microcalculators in the educational process (Instruction and methodical letter), Research Institute of the Content and Methods of Teaching of the USSR Academy of Pedagogical Sciences and the Main Department of Schools of the USSR Ministry of Education,” Mat. Shkole, No. 3, 6–8 (1982). https://uch-lit.ru/periodika/dlya-uchiteley-i-uchashhihsya/matematika-v-shkole/matematika-v-shkole-metodicheskiy-zhurn-115

  33. “Resolution No. 271 of the Central Committee of the  CPSU and the USSR Council of Ministers of March 28, 1985, ‘On measures to ensure computer literacy of secondary students and wide introduction of computer technology into the educational process’,” Vopr. Obrazovan., No. 3, 341–346 (2005).

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The first author is grateful to so many, including (the list is incomplete) S. Papert, who, together with his colleagues from MediaLab, helped the author realize his understanding of education and the role of technology in it, thanks to Nikolay Nikolayevich Konstantinov; V.A. Lektorsky, for the invitation to speak at the “Philosiphical, Methodological, Scientific, and Theoretical Problems of AI” seminar of the Scientific Council of Methodology of AI at the Department of Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences, and especially for the discussion organized by Lektorsky after the report and his own participation in this discussion. He also thanks E.A. Trufanova for her initial presentation at the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR) program launching workshop and all participants of the RFBR program “Fundamental Foundations of Digital Transformation of General Education”; A.S. Soloveichik for the “Charter of Digital Path of the School” discussion and the progress of the program; and A.I. Adamsky and A.G. Asmolov for persistent attempts to understand the author and the resulting understanding of the author himself.

The list of acknowledgements of the second author would be even longer, but so as not to bore the reader, I will limit myself to the most important persons for this text: my coauthor A.L. Semenov, who made me look at the problem of digitalizing education in a broad anthropological context; my teachers in pedagogy, Yu.I. Turchaninova and A.I. Piskunov, thanks to whom I think I have an idea of the pedagogical tradition and the transformation of education; and outstanding psychologists V.A. Petrovsky and S. Grof, in conversations with whom I realized how complex and ambiguous the human personality is.

We would also like to thank T. A. Rudchenko and V. Kondratyev for help in preparing this and other texts.

Funding

This research was funded by the Science Committee of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan (grant no. AP19680007, A.L. Semenov).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Mechanics and Mathematics, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia

    A. L. Semenov & K. E. Ziskin

  2. Axel Berg Institute of Cybernetics and Educational Computing, Federal Research Center “Computer Science and Control,” Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

    A. L. Semenov

  3. National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia

    A. L. Semenov

  4. Autonomous Nonprofit Organization of Additional Professional Education Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia

    K. E. Ziskin

Authors
  1. A. L. Semenov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. E. Ziskin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to A. L. Semenov or K. E. Ziskin.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note.

Pleiades Publishing remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Semenov, A.L., Ziskin, K.E. Expanded Personality As the Main Entity and Subject of Philosophical Analysis: Implications for Education. Dokl. Math. 108, 331–341 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064562423700965

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064562423700965

Search

Navigation