Skip to main content
Log in

Game-Theoretic Specificity of a Competitive Allocation of the Frequency Spectrum

  • SYSTEMS ANALYSIS AND OPERATIONS RESEARCH
  • Published:
Journal of Computer and Systems Sciences International Aims and scope

Abstract

We consider the problem of developing and optimizing the rules of the spectrum auction. One-sided sealed-bid spectrum auctions are studied. Two types of pricing are compared theoretically: the first-price and the second-price. А game model of the auction with free riders is constructed. A free rider uses frequencies purchased by another such participant for free. All Nash equilibria of the obtained games are found and represented in an analytical form. The significant difference between games with all free riders and games with at least one ordinary player is shown. It is proved that when players eliminate their dominated strategies, the resulting auction price of the lot is determined by its value for ordinary players. In the case when all players are free riders, the price is equal to the minimal bid price. The influence of the information the participants have about their partners’ values of a lot on the outcome of the game is discussed. The theoretically obtained properties are in agreement with the results of the experiments presented for spectrum auctions in the scientific literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. M. Jackson, “Mechanism theory,” in Optimization and Operations Research, Ed. by U. Derigs (EOLSS Publ., Oxford, 2003), vol. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. R. Davidson, Yu. V. Dogadushkina, E. M. Kreines, N. M. Novikova, A. V. Seleznev, Yu. A. Udal’tsov, and L. V. Shiryaeva, “Mathematical model of power system management in conditions of a competitive wholesale electric power (capacity) market in Russia,” J. Comput. Syst. Sci. Int. 48 (2), 243–253 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A. A. Vasin, Mathematical Models of Markets and Auctions (MAKS Press, Moscow, 2023) [in Russian].

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. K. I. Sonin, “Fundamentals of auction theory (Nobel Prize in economics 2020),” Vopr. Ekon. 1, 5–32 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Handbook of Spectrum Auction Design, Ed. by J. Bichler and J. Goeree (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2017).

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Hu and R. Shi, “Analysis of recent development of spectrum auction and forecast of future development,” in Third Int. Conf. on Economic Management and Cultural Industry (Atlantis Press, Guangzhou, 2021), Vol. 203, pp. 518–522.

  7. X. Dong, Y. Zhang, Y. Guo, Y. Gong, Y. Shen, and J. Ma, “PRAM: A practical Sybil-proof auction mechanism for dynamic spectrum access with untruthful attackers,” IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput. 22, 1143–1156 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Devi, N. Sarma, and S. K. Deka, “Multi-winner spectrum allocation in cognitive radio networks: A single-sided auction theoretic modelling approach with sequential bidding,” Electronics 10, 602–626 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Y. Dang and Z. Li, “The analysis and discussion of spectrum auctions based on case study,” J. Educ., Humanit. Social Sci. 2, 181–185 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. M. Bykowsky, M. Olson, and W. W. Sharkey, “Efficiency gains from using a market approach to spectrum management,” Inf. Econ. Policy 22, 73–90 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. W. W. Sharkey, F. Beltran, and M. M. Bykowsky, “Comparing the ability of different auction mechanisms to efficiently designate spectrum between licensed and unlicensed use,” SSRN Electron. J., 2013. http://ssrn.com/abstract=14022. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2214022.

  12. V. S. Kaplan, “The specifics and game-theoretic analysis of frequency allocation auctions,” in Abstracts of the Scientific Conference Tikhonov Readings (MAKS Press, Moscow, 2022), p. 85.

  13. Yu. B. Germeier, Introduction to the Theory of Operational Research (Nauka, Moscow, 1971) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. A. Vasin, P. S. Krasnoshchekov, and V. V. Morozov, Operational Research (Akademiya, Moscow, 2008) [in Russian].

  15. H. Moulin, Théorie des jeux pour l’économie et la politique (Hermann, Paris, 1981; Mir, Moscow, 1985).

  16. W. Vickrey, “Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders,” J. Finance 16 (1), 8–37 (1961). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1961.tb02789.x

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. N. Fookes and S. McKenzie, “Impact of budget constraints on the efficiency of multi-lot spectrum auctions,” in Handbook of Spectrum Auction Design, Ed. by M. Bichler and J. Goeree (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2017), pp. 764–781.

    Google Scholar 

  18. B. Edelman, M. Ostrovsky, and M. Schwarz, “Internet advertising and the generalized second-price auction: Selling billions of dollars worth of keywords,” Am. Econ. Rev. 97 (1), 242–259 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.97.1.242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. R. J. Weber, “Making more from less: Strategic demand reduction in the FCC spectrum auctions,” J. Econ. Manage. Strategy 6 (3), 529–548 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. P. Cramton and J. A. Schwartz, “Collusive bidding: Lessons from the FCC spectrum auctions,” J. Regul. Econ. 17, 229–252 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. P. Milgrom and I. Segal, “Designing the US incentive auction,” in Handbook of Spectrum Auction Design, Ed. by M. Bichler and J. Goeree (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2017), pp. 803–815.

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. F. Nash, “Non cooperative games,” Ann. Math. 54 (2), 286–295 (1951).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. E. Maskin, “Mechanism design for pandemics,” Rev. Econ. Des. 26 (3), 255–259 (2022).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by ongoing institutional funding. No additional grants to carry out or direct this particular research were obtained.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to V. S. Kaplan, N. M. Novikova or I. I. Pospelova.

Ethics declarations

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The author of this work declares that he has no conflicts of interest.

CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note.

Pleiades Publishing remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kaplan, V.S., Novikova, N.M. & Pospelova, I.I. Game-Theoretic Specificity of a Competitive Allocation of the Frequency Spectrum. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. Int. 62, 1011–1024 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064230723060059

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064230723060059

Keywords:

Navigation