Skip to main content
Log in

Operational goal setting in anthropocentric objects from the viewpoint of the conceptual model called Etap: II. Operation modes of the on-board real-time advisory expert system and its dialog with the crew

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Published:
Journal of Computer and Systems Sciences International Aims and scope

Abstract

The operational goal setting is the “first control phase” in anthropocentric objects. In terms of the Etap model, this is a change of the typical situation of the current session of the object’s operation. The structure of the operational goal setting is as follows: a priori information: (a) the given sequence of typical situations of the next anthropocentric object’s operation session, which ensures that the task of this session will be accomplished; (b) the set of typical situations describing the counteraction to external threats that can occur in the course of the execution of the session and the set of counteractions to onboard threats that frequently occur on board similar anthropocentric objects. The positive experience gained in using similar anthropocentric objects represented by knowledge matrices with the terms of the linguistic variable for each pair (typical session situation)–(typical situation of a counteraction to a threat), (typical situation of a counteraction to a threat)–(typical session situation). The precedent-based inference mechanism that makes it possible to select an appropriate typical situation and pass it to the object’s crew as the current operational goal. A classification of the threats, types of recommendations for the crew, and the crew’s dialogs with the onboard advisory operational goal setting expert system are described. This paper is a sequel to [1], and some concepts from that paper are repeated here to make it easier to understand.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. Yu. Zheltov and B. E. Fedunov, “Operational goal setting in anthropocentric objects from the viewpoint of the conceptual model called Etap: I. Structures of algorithms for the support of crew decision-making,” J. Com-put. Syst. Sci. Int. 54, 384 (2015).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. B. E. Fedunov, “‘Etap’ model for the image development of board intelligent systems of anthropocentric objects,” Ontol. Proektir., No. 2, 36–43 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yu. E. Gorbachev, “The network-centric warfare: myth or reality?,” Voen. Mysl’, No. 1 (2006).

  4. F-16 A/B Mid-Life Update Production Tape M3: The Pilot’s Guide (Lockheed Martin, 2004). http://fal-conblu3wolfcom/Docs/MLU_M3pdf

  5. F-35 Lockheed Martin Presentation. http://wwwslidesharenet/robbinlaird/the-F-35-cockpit

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Yu. Zheltov.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © S.Yu. Zheltov, B.E. Fedunov, 2016, published in Izvestiya Akademii Nauk. Teoriya i Sistemy Upravleniya, 2016, No. 3, pp. 51–65.

The paper is based on the presentations made by the authors at the 17th International Workshop on Computer Science and Information Technologies (CSIT-2015), Rome, Italy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zheltov, S.Y., Fedunov, B.E. Operational goal setting in anthropocentric objects from the viewpoint of the conceptual model called Etap: II. Operation modes of the on-board real-time advisory expert system and its dialog with the crew. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. Int. 55, 380–393 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064230716030175

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064230716030175

Navigation