Abstract
Wetting and drying (WD) cycles have a strong influence on the structure of soil, especially on the pore distribution, which can significantly affect soil quality and crop growth. Most studies have conducted the controlled cycles effects on soil pores at the laboratory. However, the effects of natural wetting and drying cycles (NWD) on the pore characteristics of soil are still not well understood. This study was to quantify and compare the modifications in computed tomography (CT)-measured macropore parameters induced by cycles under two experimental conditions of NWD at the field and WD at the laboratory. Intact soil cores, 15 cm in diameter and about 20 cm in height, were taken from Calcic Cambisol at cultivated land and scanned using X-ray computed tomography. Two conditions of NWD and WD cycles had obviously different influence on soil macropores, and NWD cycles may have a stronger influence than WD cycles. Soil depths had an obvious effect on soil macropore features during the cycles. Our results suggest that the decrease in soil macropore number, macroporosity, fractal dimension and connectivity density under NWD cycles is adverse to soil water retention, soil quality and crop production.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
E. Azizsoltani, N. Honarjoo, and S. Ayoubi, “How soil pore distribution could help in soil quality studies as an appropriate indicator,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 52, 654–660 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229319060036
G. Bodner, P. Scholl, and H. P. Kaul, “Field quantification of wetting-drying cycles to predict temporal changes of soil pore size distribution,” Soil Tillage Res. 133, 1–9 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2013.05.006
S. Budhathoki, J. Lamba, P. Srivastava, C. Williams, F. Arriaga, and K.G. Karthikeyan, “Impact of land use and tillage practice on soil macropore characteristics inferred from X-ray computed tomography,” Catena 210, 105886 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2021.105886
Y. Capowiez, S. Sammartino, and E. Michel, “Using X-ray tomography to quantify earthworm bioturbation non-destructively in repacked soil cores,” Geoderma 162, 124–131 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.01.011
L. Gong, L. Nie, Y. Xu, X. Ji, and B. Liu, “Characterization of micro-scale pore structure and permeability simulation of peat soil based on 2D/3D X-ray computed tomography images,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 55, 790–801 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229322060060
X. Guo, T. Zhao, L. Liu, C. Xiao, and Y. He, “Effect of sewage irrigation on the CT-measured soil pore characteristics of a clay farmland in Northern China,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 15, 1043 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15051043
X. Hu, Z. Li, X. Li, and Y. Liu, “Influence of shrub encroachment on ct-measured soil macropore characteristics in the Inner Mongolia grassland of northern China,” Soil Tillage Res. 150, 1–9 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2014.12.019
N. Jarvis, M. Larsbo, and J. Koestel, “Connectivity and percolation of structural pore networks in a cultivated silt loam soil quantified by X-ray tomography,” Geoderma 287, 71–79 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.06.026
S. Katuwal, T. Norgaard, P. Moldrup, M. Lamandé, D. Wildenschild, and L. W. de Jonge, “Linking air and water transport in intact soils to macropore characteristics inferred from X-ray computed tomography,” Geoderma 237–238, 9–20 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.08.006
F. J. Leij, T. A. Ghezzehei, and D. Or, “Modeling the dynamics of the soil pore-size distribution,” Soil Tillage Res. 64, 61–78 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(01)00257-4
M. Leue, D. Uteau-Puschmann, S. Peth, J. Nellesen, R. Kodešová, and H. H. Gerke, “Separation of soil macropore types in three-dimensional X-ray computed tomography images based on pore geometry characteristics,” Vadose Zone J. 18, 180170 (2019). https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2018.09.0170
T. C. Li, M. A. Shao, and Y. H. Jia, “Application of X‑ray tomography to quantify macropore characteristics of loess soil under two perennial plants,” Eur. J. Soil Sci. 67, 266–275 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12330
L. Luo, H. Lin, and S. Li, “Quantification of 3-D soil macropore networks in different soil types and land uses using computed tomography,” J. Hydrol. 393, 53–64 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.03.031
R. Ma, C. Cai, Z. Li, J. Wang, T. Xiao, G. Peng, and W. Yang, “Evaluation of soil aggregate microstructure and stability under wetting and drying cycles in two Ultisols using synchrotron-based X-ray micro-computed tomography,” Soil Tillage Res. 149, 1–11 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2014.12.016
C. Meng, J. Niu, X. Li, Z. Luo, X. Du, J. Du, X. Lin, and X. Yu, “Quantifying soil macropore networks in different forest communities using industrial computed tomography in a mountainous area of North China,” J. Soils Sediments 17, 2357–2370 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-016-1441-2
A. Musso, K. Lamorski, C. Sławiński, C. Geitner, A. Hunt, K. Greinwald, and M. Egli, “Evolution of soil pores and their characteristics in a siliceous and calcareous proglacial area,” Catena 182, 104154 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2019.104154
X. Peng, R. Horn, and A. Smucker, “Pore shrinkage dependency of inorganic and organic soils on wetting and drying cycles,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 71, 1095 (2007). https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2006.0156
Y. Périard, S. J. Gumiere, B. Long, A. N. Rousseau, and J. Caron, “Use of X-ray CT scan to characterize the evolution of the hydraulic properties of a soil under drainage conditions,” Geoderma 279, 22–30 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.05.020
V. K. Phogat and L. Aylmore, “Evaluation of soil structure by using computer-assisted tomography,” Soil Res. 27, 313–323 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1071/SR9890313
L. F. Pires, O. O. S. Bacchi, and K. Reichardt, “Gamma ray computed tomography to evaluate wetting/drying soil structure changes,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 229, 443–456 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2004.12.118
L. F. Pires, K. Reichardt, M. Cooper, F. A. M. Cassaro, N. M. P. Dias, and O. O. S. Bacchi, “Pore system changes of damaged brazilian oxisols and nitosols induced by wet-dry cycles as seen in 2-D micromorphologic image analysis,” An. Acad. Bras. Cienc. 81, 151–161 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1590/S0001-37652009000100016
I. A. Taina, R. J. Heck, and T. R. Elliot, “Application of X-ray computed tomography to soil science: a literature review,” Can. J. Soil Sci. 88, 1–20 (2008). https://doi.org/10.4141/CJSS06027
R. P. Udawatta and S. H. Anderson, “CT-measured pore characteristics of surface and subsurface soils influenced by agroforestry and grass buffers,” Geoderma 145, 381–389 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.04.004
Y. Wang, J. Chen, W. Gu, Y. Xu, J. Gu, and J. Tao, “Earthworm activities increase the leaching of salt and water from salt-affected agricultural soil during the wet-dry process under simulated rainfall conditions,” Biol. Fertil. Soils 52, 323–330 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-015-1078-0
S. Zhang, Q. Tang, Y. Bao, X. He, F. Tian, F. Lü, M. Wang, and R. Anjum, “Effects of seasonal water-level fluctuation on soil pore structure in the Three Gorges Reservoir, China,” J. Mt. Sci. 15, 2192–2206 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-018-5013-3
Z. B. Zhang, X. Peng, H. Zhou, H. Lin, and H. Sun, “Characterizing preferential flow in cracked paddy soils using computed tomography and breakthrough curve,” Soil Tillage Res. 146, 53–65 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2014.05.016
Funding
This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42177070), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Universities of Henan Province (NSFRF210321).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guo, X.M., Guo, N. & Liu, L. Effects of Wetting-Drying Cycles on the CT-Measured Macropore Characteristics under Farmland in Northern China. Eurasian Soil Sc. 56, 747–755 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229323700163
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229323700163