Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Carbon Stock Differentials and Sequestration Potential under Different Cropping Systems in a Tropical Monsoon Region, South-West India

  • SOIL CHEMISTRY
  • Published:
Eurasian Soil Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study estimates the soil organic carbon stock under various cropping systems to assess their sequestration potential in a tropical monsoon region, namely the Chulliyar-Ikshumathi sub-watershed of Bharathapuzha in Kerala, India. The cropping systems selected are the paddy, vegetables, coconut-arecanut groves, homestead farms, and mango plantations. The standard soil analyzing procedures to collect and analyze 129 soil samples from 43 locations were followed. The carbon stock (CS) of 0–10, 10–20, and 20–30 cm depth layers at each sampling location was estimated following the Walkley-Black method. The sequestration potential of soil under each cropping system is estimated to suggest an optimal cropping system for the region. The CS decreased with depth, irrespective of cropping systems. Among the cropping systems, the mango plantations, which practiced zero/no-tillage, have stability in the distribution of CS, while paddy fields showed higher variability in the CS. Even though mango plantations have more carbon sequestration potential (CSP), the coconut-arecanut grove is a better candidate for carbon sequestration (CSeq) in this region owing to its wider areal extent and acceptability. This analysis reveals the importance of assessing CS at the watershed level for sustainable land use planning to achieve better sequestration of atmospheric carbon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Set of farming methods and peasant movement at grass root level prevailed in various States of India. Zero budget indicates, non-use of any credit and non-spending of money for purchase of inputs. It also consists of the use of cow dung and Gomutra (cow’s urine) as fertilizer and pesticide respectively.

REFERENCES

  1. S. I. C. Akpa, I. O. A. Odeh, T. F. A. Bishop, A. E. Hartemink, and I. Y. Amapu, “Total soil organic carbon and carbon sequestration potential in Nigeria,” Geoderma 271, 202–215 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.02.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. T. Bhattacharya, D. K. Pal, C. Mandal, and M. Velayutham, “Organic carbon stock in Indian soils and their geographical distribution,” Curr. Sci. 79 (5), 655–660 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  3. T. Blaschke, “Object based image analysis for remote sensing,” ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 65 (1), 2–16 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. F. P. M. Dias, W. M. Leandro, P. M. Fernandes, and F. A. da S. Xavier, “Impact of short-term land-use change on soil organic carbon dynamics in transitional agro-ecosystems: a case study in the Brazilian Cerrado,” Carbon Manage. 13 (1), 238–248 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2022.2074313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. J. M. Gray, T. F. A. Bishop, and B. R. Wilson, “Factors controlling soil organic carbon stocks with depth in Eastern Australia,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 79 (6), 1741–1751 (2015). https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2015.06.0224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. E. A. Kaiser and O. Heinemeyer, “Seasonal variations of soil microbial biomass carbon within the plough layer,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 25 (12), 1649–1655 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. P. Kumar, P. C. Pandey, B. K. Singh, S. Katiyar, V. P. Mandal, M. Rani, V. Tomar, and S. Patairiya, “Estimation of accumulated soil organic carbon stock in tropical forest using geospatial strategy,” Egypt. J. Remote Sens. Space Sci. 19 (1), 109–123 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Lal, “Global potential of soil carbon sequestration to mitigate the greenhouse effect,” Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 22 (2), 151–184 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. R. Lal, “The potential of carbon sequestration in soils of South Asia,” (International Soil Conservation Organization, 2004), Vol. 134, pp. 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. Lal, “Carbon sequestration,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc., B 363, 815–830 (2008).

  11. X. Lee, Y. Huang, D. Huang, L. Hu, and Z. Feng, “Variation of soil organic carbon and its major constraints in East Central Asia,” PLoS One 11 (3),1–18 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  12. B. Minasny, B. P. Malone, A. B. McBratney, D. A. Angers, D. Arrouays, A. Chambers, V. Chaplot, et al., “Soil carbon 4 per mille,” Geoderma 292, 59–86 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. D. W. Nelson and L. E. Sommers, “Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter,” in Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 3: Chemical Methods, Ed. by D. L. Sparks, et al. (SSSA Book Series No. 5, SSSA and ASA, Madison, 1996), pp. 961–1010.

  14. L. Niu, J. Hao, B. Zhang, X. Niu, and Z. Lu, “Long-term spatial and temporal variations of soil organic carbon in the Handan region in Northern China,” Front. Agric. China 2 (4), 410–417 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11703-008-0064-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. T. G. Orton, M. J. Pringle, K. L. Page, R. C. Dalal, and T. F. A. Bishop, “Spatial prediction of soil organic carbon stock using a linear model of coregionalisation,” Geoderma 230–231, 119–130 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. T. R. Pearson, S. L. Brown, and R. A. Birdsey, Measurement Guidelines for the Sequestration of Forest Carbon (U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Newtown Square, 2007). https://doi.org/10.2737/NRS-GTR-18.

  17. M. A. Sheikh, M. Kumar, and R. W. Bussmann, “Altitudinal variation in soil organic carbon stock in coniferous subtropical and broadleaf temperate forests in Garhwal Himalaya,” Carbon Balance Manage. 4 (1), 6 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. P. Smith, et al. Agriculture, Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2007 (Meyer Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge), Ch. 8. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511546013

  19. S. J. Thein and J. G. Graveel, Laboratory Manual for Soil Science. Agricultural and Environmental Principles, 8th Ed. (McGraw Hill Science/Engineering/Math., 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  20. B. van Wesemael, K. Paustian, J. Meersmans, E. Goidts, G. Barancikova, and M. Easter, “Agricultural management explains historic changes in regional soil carbon stocks,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107 (33), 14926–14930 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1002592107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. K. Venkanna, U. K. Mandal, A. J. Solomon Raju, K. L. Sharma, R. V. Adake, Pushpanjali, B. Sanjeeva Reddy, R. N. Masane, K. Venkatravamma, and B. Peda Babu, “Carbon stocks in major soil types and land-use systems in semi-arid tropical region of southern India,” Curr. Sci. 106 (4), 604–611 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  22. A. Walkley, “A critical examination of a rapid method for determining organic carbon in soil: effect of variations in digestion conditions and of inorganic soil constituents,” Soil Sci. 63 (4), 251–263 (1947).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. X. Xia, Z. Yang, Y. Liao, Y. Cui, and Y. Li, “Temporal variation of soil carbon stock and its controlling factors over the last two decades on the Southern Songnen plain, Heilongjiang Province,” Geosci. Front. 1 (1), 125–132 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2010.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are duly acknowledging the Radiotracer Laboratory, Kerala Agricultural University, Mannuthy, Thrissur, for their support in analyzing the soil samples.

Funding

We have not received any funding to carry out this research. However, the first Author received Senior Research Fellowship from the University Grants Commission, Government of India, during her initial days of Ph D research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography, Government Arts and Science College, 678722, Tholanur, Kerala, India

    V. Powshi

  2. Centre for the Study of Regional Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, 110067, New Delhi, India

    S. Sreekesh

  3. National Bureau of Soil Science and Land Use Planning (NBSS&LUP), Nagpur, India

    G. P. Obi Reddy

Authors
  1. V. Powshi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Sreekesh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. G. P. Obi Reddy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Sreekesh.

Ethics declarations

The authors report that there are no competing interests. We have no conflict of interest to disclose.

The primary data generated and used in this research is available to the research community for bonafide use, and interested researchers can contact the corresponding Author.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Powshi, V., Sreekesh, S. & Obi Reddy, G.P. Carbon Stock Differentials and Sequestration Potential under Different Cropping Systems in a Tropical Monsoon Region, South-West India. Eurasian Soil Sc. 56, 1034–1042 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229323600148

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229323600148

Keywords:

Search

Navigation