Skip to main content
Log in

Short-Range Lateral Variation of Humus and Carbonate Profiles of Agrochernozems (Belgorod Oblast)

  • GENESIS AND GEOGRAPHY OF SOILS
  • Published:
Eurasian Soil Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The short-range lateral variation of soil properties is a particular expression of the spatial soil variability and a non-directional short-periodic (in the range of a few meters) change in soil-profile features. Contrary to the soil cover pattern theory of discrete soil cover, the short-range variation of soil properties characterizes the soil cover continuum: the soil cover is presented as a field of various soil properties, and the boundaries of chosen ranges of soil properties may not coincide with boundaries of soil taxa. This study is based on soil data from three parallel transects (240 m long) laid on the watershed perpendicular to a 60-year-old shelterbelt and crossing it in their central part. The sampling step is 10 m on agricultural fields and 6 m under the shelterbelt. Features of the humus (the content of organic carbon in the 0–20 cm layer and the thickness of the humus horizon and profile) and carbonate (the effervescence depth, the carbonate content in the effervescence layer, and the horizon of maximal accumulation of carbonates) profiles are analyzed for 75 observation points. It is shown that the parameters of the humus and carbonate profiles of soils are characterized by periodic changes at intervals of 6–10 meters. The parameters of the humus profile are characterized by lower variation coefficients (<30%) than the parameters of the carbonate profile (>50%). The growth of trees on agrochernozems (Haplic Chernozems (Aric)) for 60 years resulted in the formation of new taxonomic components (postagrogenic agrochernozems (Haplic Chernozems)) characterized by a smaller lateral variation in soil properties as compared to plowed soils. Three soil types are specified within the studied area: agrochernozems (64 points; Haplic Chernozems (Aric, Loamic, Pachic)); clay-illuvial agrochernozem (7 points; Luvic Chernozems (Aric, Loamic, Pachic) and Luvic Chernic Phaeozems (Aric, Loamic, Pachic, Loamic, Pachic)); and clay-illuvial quasigley agrochernozems (4 points; Luvic Stagnic Chernic Phaeozems (Aric, Loamic, Pachic)), including eight subtypes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

REFERENCES

  1. E. V. Arinushkina, Manual on Soil Chemical Analysis (Mosk. Univ., Moscow, 1970) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. A. Afanas’eva, Chernozems of the Central Russian Upland (Nauka, Moscow, 1966) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  3. V. G. Belevantsev and Yu. G. Chendev, “Cartographic analysis of social and natural phenomena on the territory of the Belgorod region in the 18th, 19th and 20th centuries,” in Problems of Nature Management and the Ecological Situation in European Russia and Neighboring Countries (Politerra, Belgorod, 2015), pp. 6–16 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  4. N. V. Denisova, “Soil cover of the Kursk experimental station,” in Scientific Works of the Kursk Agricultural Experimental Station (Kursk, 1967), Vol. 1, pp. 27–31.

  5. P. P. Dmitriev and O. I. Khudyakov, Pedogenesis in the Settlements of Burrowing Mammals (KMK, Moscow, 2018) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. P. Zhidkin and A. N. Gennadiev, “Quantification of the vertical translocation rate of soil solid-phase material by the magnetic tracer method,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 49 (7), 730–738 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Classification and Diagnostic System of Russian Soils (Oikumena, Smolensk, 2004) [in Russian].

  8. Classification and Diagnostics of Soils of the USSR (Kolos, Moscow, 1977) [in Russian].

  9. E. V. Knyazhneva, S. M. Nadezhkin, and A. S. Frid, “The spatial heterogeneity of the fertility in a leached chernozem within a field,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 39 (9), 1011–1020 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. F. I. Kozlovskii, Theory and Methods of Studying the Soil Cover (GEOS, Moscow, 2003) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  11. N. L. Kurachenko, “Spatio-temporal dynamics of agrochemical indicators of chernozem under conditions of minimum tillage,” Probl. Sovrem. Agrar. Nauki, 42–45 (2018).

  12. I. I. Lebedeva, “Humus and carbonate accumulations as diagnostic criteria in the chernozems of Eastern Europe,” Byull. Pochv. Inst. im. V. V. Dokuchaeva, No. 68, 3–18 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. V. Lukin, Agroecological State and Soil Productivity of the Belgorod Oblast (Konstanta, Belgorod, 2016) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. A. Smirnova, A. N. Gennadiev, Yu. G. Chendev, and R. G. Kovach, “Influence of forest shelterbelts on local pedodiversity (Belgorod oblast),” Eurasian Soil Sci. 53 (9), 1195–1205 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. V. A. Sidorova and P. V. Krasilnikov, “Soil-geographic interpretation of spatial variability in the chemical and physical properties of topsoil horizons in the steppe zone,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 40 (10), 1042–1051 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. V. M. Semenov and B. M. Kogut, Soil Organic Matter (GEOS, Moscow, 2015) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  17. I. A. Sokolov, Theoretical Problems of Genetic Soil Science (Nauka, Sib. Izd. Firma, 1993) [in Russian].

  18. N. P. Sorokina, “Dynamics of the soil cover of the plowed slope of the Kursk Experimental Station over a 20-year period,” in Regional Models of Soil Fertility as a Basis for Improving Zonal Farming Systems (Pochv. Inst. im. V. V. Dokuchaeva, Moscow, 1988), pp. 163–171 [in Russian].

  19. N. P. Sorokina, “The use of statistical methods to refine the diagnosis of chernozems,” in Large Scale Soil Mapping (Nauka, Moscow, 1971), pp. 123–132 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  20. N. P. Sorokina, “Elementary soil cover patterns in the fields of the Kursk experimental station,” in Large-Scale Soil Cartography and Its Importance in the Agriculture of the Chernozem Zone (Pochv. Inst. im. V. V. Dokuchaeva, Moscow, 1976), pp. 155–173 [in Russian].

  21. D. S. Fomin, “Spatial regularities of the distribution of organic and carbonate carbon in the agrolandscape (Kursk Research Institute of Agroindustrial Production),” in Soil Science: Horizons of the Future (2017), pp. 76–81 [in Russian].

  22. M. I. Fishman, “Chernozem complexes and their relationship with the relief on the Central Russian Upland,” Pochvovedenie, No. 5, 17–30 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  23. V. M. Fridland, Soil Cover Pattern (Mysl’, Moscow, 1972), p. 424 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  24. V. M. Fridland, V. P. Belobrov, and E. K. Daineko, “Experience in statistical analysis of morphological properties of virgin steppe chernozems,” Pochvovedenie, No. 4, 12–24 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  25. N. B. Khitrov, “The development of detailed soil maps on the basis of interpolation of data on soil properties,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 45 (10), 918–928 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. N. B. Khitrov and S. V. Loiko, “Soil cover patterns on flat interfluves in the Kamennaya Steppe,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 43 (12), 1309–1321 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. L. K. Tselishcheva and E. K. Daineko, “Essay on the soils of the Streltsy section of the Central Chernozemic Reserve,” in Proceedings of the Central Black Earth Nature Reserve Named after V. V. Alekhin (1966), Vol. 10.

  28. A. E. Hartemink, A. N. Gennadiyev, J. G. Bockheim, and N. Bero, “Short-range variation in a Wisconsin soilscape (USA),” Eurasian Soil Sci. 50 (2), 198–209 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. G. B. M. Heuvelink and R. Webster, “Modelling soil variation: past, present, and future,” Geoderma 100 (3–4), 269–301 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. N. Khitrov, M. Smirnova, N. Lozbenev, E. Levchenko, V. Gribov, D. Kozlov, D. Rukhovich, N. Kalinina, and P. Koroleva, “Soil cover patterns in the forest-steppe and steppe zones of the East-European plain,” Soil Sci. Annu. 70 (3), 198–210 (2019). https://doi.org/10.2478/ssa-2019-0018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. N. Lozbenev, A. Yurova, M. Smirnova, and D. Kozlov, “Incorporating process-based modeling into digital soil mapping: A case study in the virgin steppe of the central Russian upland,” Geoderma 383, 114733 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. A. B. McBratney and R. Webster, “Spatial dependence and classification of the soil along a transect in northeast Scotland,” Geoderma 26 (1-2), 63–82 (1981).

  33. M. T. Wilkinson, P. J. Richards, and G. S. Humphreys, “Breaking ground: Pedological, geological, and ecological implications of soil bioturbation,” Earth-Sci. Rev. 97, 254–269 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2009.09.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Y. Zhang and A. E. Hartemink, “Quantifying short-range variation of soil texture and total carbon of a 330-ha farm,” Catena 201, 105200 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project no. 19-17-00056.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. A. Smirnova.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Translated by I. Bel’chenko

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Smirnova, M.A., Gennadiev, A.N. & Chendev, Y.G. Short-Range Lateral Variation of Humus and Carbonate Profiles of Agrochernozems (Belgorod Oblast). Eurasian Soil Sc. 56, 260–270 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229322602372

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229322602372

Keywords:

Navigation