Skip to main content
Log in

Actinomycete Complexes in Eutrophic Peatlands

  • SOIL BIOLOGY
  • Published:
Eurasian Soil Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The actinomycete complexes of eutrophic peatlands differing by genesis were studied in order to broaden the knowledge of microorganisms’ biodiversity in wetland ecosystems and to detect microorganisms with a high potential for antagonistic action. The research sites included eutrophic peatlands of lacustrine, forest, and floodplain origins in Tver and Tomsk regions, Russia. Samples from the 3-m-thick peatlands were taken layer-by-layer with due account for the botanical composition of peat in September 2019. The length and biomass of the mycelium of actinomycetes were determined by luminescent microscopy; and the number of culturable actinomycetes was determined by plate method. The actinomycetes species were identified by their morphological and cultural features and the analysis of 16S rRNA fragments. The antagonistic activity of streptomycetes was analyzed by the method of agar blocks. The actinomycetic mycelium was found throughout the peatland profiles. Its length varied from 700 to 3000 m/g dry peat and its biomass was from 22 to 140 mg/g dry peat. A reliable correlation between the abundance of actinomycetic mycelium and the botanical composition of peat was determined for the first time. It was also found that the abundance of actinomycetic mycelium depends on the degree of decomposition of profile-forming peat. The actinomycete complex included representatives of the Streptomyces, Micromonospora, Streptosporangium, and Streptoverticillium genera. Representatives of Streptomyces were dominant according to their occurrence frequency and were assigned to 19 species from 9 series and 5 sections. About 70% of the studied actinomycetes demonstrated the ability for microaerophilic growth. This fact indicated that these actinomycetes are adapted to the oxygen deficiency in the deep layers of peatlands. Antibacterial activity was found in 89% of the isolates. S. avicenniae and S. caeruleus proved to be the most active strains with antibacterial activity and multiple resistance to antibiotics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. N. A. Avetov and E. A. Shishkonakova, “Some aspects of the systematics and diagnostics of peat soils of boreal mires” Eurasian Soil Sci. 52 (8), 871–879 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229319080039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. E. K. Vishnyakova, N. P. Mironycheva-Tokareva, and N. P. Kosykh, “Dynamics of plant decomposition in Vasyugan mires,” Vestnik TGPU 7 (122), 87–93 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. F. Gauze, N. P. Preobrazhenskaya, M. A. Sveshnikova, L. P. Terekhova, and T. S. Maksimova, Manual of Actinomycetes (Nauka, Moscow, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. V. Golovchenko and E. M. Volkova, “Microbial biomass and its structure in karst peats of Tula oblast,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 52 (3), 333–338 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229319030049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. A. V. Golovchenko, Ju. D. Dmitrienko, T. G. Dobrovolskaya, T. A. Gracheva, L. I. Inisheva, and P. A. Kozhevin, “Bacterial complexes in fens of Tomsk oblast: abundance, taxonomic structure, and activity,” Moscow Univ. Soil Sci. Bull., 75 (4–5), 184–191 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147687420040031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. A. V. Golovchenko, Yu. D. Dmitrienko, A. A. Morozov, L. A. Pozdnyakov, T. V. Glukhova, L. I. Inisheva, “Microbial biomass in eutrophic peatlands: stock, structure and activity,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 54 (7), 1068–1077 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229321050094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. A. V. Golovchenko, L. M. Polyanskaya, T. G. Dobrovol’skaya, L. V. Vasil’eva, I. Yu. Chernov, and D. G. Zvyagintsev, “Spatial distribution and structure of microbial complexes in swamp ecosystems,” Pochvovedenie, No. 10, 78–89 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. V. Golovchenko, E. Yu. Tikhonova, and D. G. Zvyagintsev, “Abundance, biomass. structure. and activity of microbial complexes in lowmoor and highmoor peatlands,” Mikrobiologiya 76 (5), 711–719 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  9. T. G. Dobrovol’skaya, A. V. Golovchenko, O. S. Kukharenko, A. V. Yakushev, T. A. Semenova, L. I. Inisheva, “The structure of the microbial communities in low-moor and high-moor peat bogs of Tomsk oblast,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 45 (3), 273–281 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229312030039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. T. G. Dobrovol’skaya, L. M. Polyanskaya, A. V. Golovchenko, M. V. Smagina, D. G. Zvyagintsev, “Microbial pool of peat soils,” Pochvovedenie, No. 7, 69–77 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. S. Dubrova, D. A. Lubsanova, E. P. Makarova, P. A. Kozhevin, N. A. Manucharova, G. M. Zenova, “Psychrotolerant actinomyces in tundra and northern taiga soils,” Vestn. Mosk. Univ., Ser. 17 Pochvovedenie, No. 2, 3–8 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. G. Zvyagintsev, T. G. Dobrovol’skaya, A. V. Golovchenko, G. M. Zenova, M. V. Smagina, “Structure of the complex of saprotrophic microorganisms in peatlands,” Mikrobiologiya 60 (6), 155–164 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. G. Zvyagintsev and G. M. Zenova, Ecology of Actinomycetes (Geos, Moscow, 2001) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  14. G. M. Zenova, A. A. Gryadunova, E. A. Doroshenko, A. A. Likhacheva, I. I. Sudnitsyn, T. N. Pochatkova, D. G. Zvyagintsev, “Influence of moisture on the vital activity of actinomycetes in a cultivated low-moor peat soil,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 40 (5), 560–564 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229307050110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. G. M. Zenova, A. A. Gryadunova, A. I. Pozdnyakov, and D. G. Zvyagintsev, “Aerobic and microaerophilic actinomycetes of typical agropeat and peat soils,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 41 (2), 210–214 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229308020129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. G. M. Zenova and D. G. Zvyagintsev, Diversity of Actinomycetes in Terrestrial Ecosystems (Izd. Mosk. Univ., Moscow, 2002) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  17. G. M. Zenova., N. A. Manycharova, D. G. Zvyagintsev “Extremophilic and extremotolerant actinomycetes in different soil types” Eurasian Soil Sci. 44 (4). 417–436 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229311040132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. T. G. Zimenko, A. S. Samsonova, A. G. Misnik, V. V. Gavrilkina, L. I. Fillipshanova, Microbial Cenoses in Peat Soils and Their Functioning (Nauka i tekhnika, Minsk, 1983) [in Russian].

  19. P. A. Kozhevin, L. M. Polyanskaya, and D. G. Zvyagintsev, “Dynamics of the development of different microorganisms in soil,” Mikrobiologiya 48 (4), 490–494 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  20. L. V. Lysak, A. A. Likhacheva, and I. V. Alferova, Methods of Isolation and Study of Soil Actinomycetes, Producers and Antibiotics (Maks Press, Moscow, 2005) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  21. N. A. Manucharova, E. V. Belova, L. M. Polyanskaya, and G. M. Zenova, “A chitinolytic actinomycete complex in chernozem soil”, Microbiology (Moscow) 73 (1), 56–59 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MICI.0000016369.05948.6f

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Methods of Soil Biochemistry and Microbiology (Izd. Mosk. Univ., Moscow, 1991), 304 pp. [in Russian].

  23. National Soil Atlas of the Russian Federation, Ed. by S. A. Shoba (Astrel’: AST, Moscow, 2011) [in Russian].

  24. L. L. Shishov, V. D. Tonkonogov, I. I. Lebedeva, and M. I. Gerasimova, Classification and Diagnostic System of Russian Soils (Oikumena, Smolensk, 2004) [in Russian].

  25. H. K. Alten, J. Donato, H. H. Wang, K. A. Cloud-Hansen, J. Davies, J. Handelsman, “Call of the wild antibiotic resistance genes in natural environments,” Nature Rev. Microbiol 8 (4), 251–258 (2010).https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. B. Berg and C. McClaugherty, “Decomposer organisms,” in Plant Litter—Decomposition, Humus Formation, Carbon Sequestration (Springer, Netherlands, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  27. J. Chen, H. J. Xie, X. L. Zhuang, G. Q. Zhuang, Z. H. Bai, H. X. Zhang, “Substrate induced changes in microbial community-level physiological profiles and their application to discriminate soil microbial communities,” J. Environ. Sci. 20 (6), 725–731 (2008).https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(08)62119-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. V. M. D’Costa, C. E. Kins, L. Kalan, M. Morar, W. W. Sung, C. Schwarz, D. Froese, G. Zazula, F. Calmels, G. B. Golding, “Antibiotic resistance is ancient,” Nature 477, 457–461 (2011).https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. K. G. Eilers, C. L. Lauber, R. Knight, and N. Fierer, “Shifts in bacterial community structure associated with inputs of low molecular weight carbon compounds to soil,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 42, 896–903 (2010).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. A. Funk and P. V. Divekar, “Caerulomycin, a new antibiotic from streptomyces Caeruleus baldacci: I. Production, isolation, assay, and biological properties,” Can. J. Microbiol. 5 (4), 317–324 (1959).https://doi.org/10.1139/m59-039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. T. V. Glukhova, D. V. Ilyasov, S. E. Vompersky, A. V. Golovchenko, N. A. Manucharova, A. L. Stepanov, “Soil respiration in alder swamp (Alnus glutinosa) in southern taiga of European Russia depending on microrelief,” FORESTS 12 (4), 496–514 (2021).https://doi.org/10.3390/f12040496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. K. Peltoniemi, P. Strakova, H. Fritze, P. A. Iraizoz, T. Pennanen, R. Laiho, “How water-level drawdown modifies litter-decomposing fungal and actinobacterial communities in boreal peatlands,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 51, 20–34 (2012).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.04.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. D. C. Schlatter and L. L. Kinkel, “Do tradeoffs structure antibiotic inhibition, resistance and resource use among soil-borne streptomyces?,” BMC Evolutionary Biol. 15 (1) (2015).https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-015-0470-6

  34. T. Tamura, Y. Ishida, and I. M. Otoguro, “Reclassification of Streptomyces caeruleus as a synonym of Actinoalloteichus cyanogriseus and reclassification of Streptomyces spheroides and Streptomyces laceyi as later synonyms of Streptomyces niveus,” Int. J. Syst. Evol, Microbiol. 58, 2812–2814 (2008).https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.65560-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. S. A. Waksman, The Actinomycetes. Classification, Identification and Description of Genera and Species (Williams and Willins Co, Baltimore, 1961), Vol. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  36. R. S. Wardana, D. Ryandini, and O. Oedjijono, “Antibacterial capacity of Streptomyces avicenniae isolate from a mangrove plant rhizosphere Avicennia marina,” Scripta Biologia 4 (2), 131–134 (2017).https://doi.org/10.20884/1.SB.2017.4.2.433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. J. Xiao, Y. Wang, Y. Luo, et al., “Streptomyces Avicenniae sp. nov., a novel actinomycete isolated from the rhizosphere of the mangrove plant Avicennia mariana,” Int. J. System. and Evol. Microb. 59, 2624–2628 (2009).https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.009357-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Experimental data were obtained with financial support of the Russian Science Foundation, project no. 21-14-00076. The study of antagonistic activity of streptomycetes and their resistance to antibiotics was carried out by T.A. Gracheva, A.V. Golovchenko, and N.A. Manucharova with financial support from the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation, project no. 075-15-2021-1396.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. V. Golovchenko.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no co

Additional information

Translated by T. Chicheva

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Golovchenko, A.V., Gracheva, T.A., Lypcan, V.A. et al. Actinomycete Complexes in Eutrophic Peatlands. Eurasian Soil Sc. 55, 1064–1073 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229322080026

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229322080026

Keywords:

Navigation