Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Remediation of Technogenic Barren Soils in the Kola Subarctic: Current State and Long-Term Dynamics

  • DEGRADATION, REHABILITATION, AND CONSERVATION OF SOILS
  • Published:
Eurasian Soil Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Widespread industrial pollution and its serious ecological and economic consequences make it urgent to develop and refine approaches to remediation of soils as a key ecosystem component. The long-term impact of atmospheric emissions from nonferrous metallurgy enterprises in Monchegorsk (Murmansk region) resulted in the formation of technogenic barrens with contaminated and highly degraded soils near the pollution source. During long-term monitoring, the current status and dynamics of soil properties have been assessed on permanent control plots on barrens and in birch and willow plantations after remediation performed in 2003–2008 by two methods: chemophytostabilization and covering of contaminated soils by an artificially created fertile layer. The research data of 2011, 2015, and 2018 indicate the continuing acidification of soils and their contamination by heavy metals. Despite the reduction in emissions, the concentrations of available heavy metals in the topsoil of barrens and chemophytostabilized plots do not decrease, and the constructed layers accumulate nickel, copper, cobalt, iron, cadmium, lead, and manganese. The nutrient supply of soils is steadily improved only when a fertile layer is applied. According to the results of the multivariate analysis, the soils of barrens and remediation plots are clearly separated in the space of the first two principal components as the soil properties are improved during remediation, and the positions of chemophytostabilization plots reflect the unstable improvements. Recommendations for the development of a strategy and diversification of methods for remediation of technogenic barrens should take into account different levels of soil pollution and degradation in the vicinity of nonferrous metallurgy enterprises and the need to comply with technological requirements and perform supporting measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. V. S. Barkan and I. V. Lyanguzova, “Changes in the degree of contamination of organic horizons of Al–Fe-humus podzols upon a decrease in aerotechnogenic loads, the Kola Peninsula,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 51, 327–335 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. E. L. Vorobeichik and S. Y. Kaigorodova, “Long-term dynamics of heavy metals in the upper horizons of soils in the region of a copper smelter impacts during the period of reduced emission,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 50, 977–990 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. G. A. Evdokimova, G. V. Kalabin, and N. P. Mozgova, “Contents and toxicity of heavy metals in soils of the zone affected by aerial emissions from the Severonikel Enterprise,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 44, 237–244 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. G. M. Kashulina, “Monitoring of soil contamination by heavy metals in the impact zone of copper–nickel smelter on the Kola Peninsula,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 51, 467–478 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. G. M. Kashulina, “Extreme pollution of soils by emissions of the copper–nickel industrial complex in the Kola Peninsula,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 50, 837–849 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. G. M. Kashulina and N. V. Saltan, Chemical Composition of Plants in the Local Impact Zone of Severonikel Smelter (Kola Scientific Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Apatity, 2008) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. N. Koptsik, S. V. Koptsik, and I. E. Smirnova, “Alternative technologies for remediation of technogenic barrens in the Kola Subarctic,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 49, 1294–1309 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. G. N. Koptsik, S. V. Koptsik, I. E. Smirnova, A. D. Kudryavtseva, and K. A. Turbabina, “The response of forest ecosystems to reduction in industrial atmospheric emission in the Kola Subarctic,” Zh. Obshch. Biol. 77 (2), 145–163 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  9. V. N. Korotkov, G. N. Koptsik, I. E. Smirnova, and S. V. Koptsik, “Restoration of vegetation on mine lands near Monchegorsk (Murmansk oblast, Russia),” Russ. J. Ecosyst. Ecol. 4 (1), 1–18 (2019). https://doi.org/10.21685/2500-0578-2019-1-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. I. V. Lyanguzova, D. K. Goldvirt, and I. K. Fadeeva, “Spatiotemporal dynamics of the pollution of A1–Fe-humus podzols in the impact zone of a nonferrous metallurgical plant,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 49, 1189–1203 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. AMAP Assessment 2002: Heavy Metals in the Arctic (Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Program, Oslo, 2005).

  12. AMAP Assessment 2006: Acidifying Pollutants, Arctic Haze, and Acidification in the Arctic (Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Program, Oslo, 2006).

  13. D. Campbell, K. Stewart, G. Spiers, and P. Beckett, “Growth and metal uptake of canola and sunflower along a thickness gradient of organic-rich covers over metal mine tailings,” Ecol. Eng. 109, 133–139 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.08.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. V. Ettler, “Soil contamination near non-ferrous metal smelters: a review,” Appl. Geochem. 64, 56–74 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2015.09.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Z. He, J. Shentu, X. Yang, V. C. Baligar, T. Zhang, and P. J. Stoffella, “Heavy metal contamination of soils: sources, indicators, and assessment,” J. Environ. Indic. 9, 17–18 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  16. G. Kashulina, P. Caritat, and C. de Reimann, “Snow and rain chemistry around the “Severonikel” industrial complex, NW Russia: current status and retrospective analysis,” Atmos. Environ. 89, 672–682 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.03.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. M. V. Kozlov and E. L. Zvereva, “Industrial barrens: extreme habitats created by non-ferrous metallurgy,” in Life in Extreme Environments, Ed. by R. Amils, C. Ellis-Evans, and H. Hinghofer-Szalkay (Springer-Verlag, Dordrecht, 2007), pp. 69–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6285-8_5

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Kuhlberg and S. Miller, “Protection to the sulphur-smoke tort-feasors: the tragedy of pollution in Sudbury, Ontario, the world’s nickel capital, 1884–1927,” Can. Hist. Rev. 99 (2), 225–257 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3138/chr.99.2.03

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Land Reclamation Program: 2019 Report (VETAC, Greater Sudbury, 2019).

  20. P. Panagos, M. van Liedekerke, Y. Yigini, and L. Montanarella, “Contaminated sites in Europe: review of the current situation based on data collected through a European network,” J. Environ. Publ. Health 2013, 158764 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/158764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. C. Reimann, M. Äyräs, V. A. Chekushin, I. Bogatyrev, R. Boyd, P. de Caritat, R. Dutter, et al., Environmental Geochemical Atlas of the Central Barents Region (Schweizerbart, Stuttgart, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  22. R. Salminen, V. Chekushin, M. Tenhola, I. Bogatyrev, S. P. Glavatskikh, E. Fedotova, V. Gregorauskiene, et al., “Geochemical atlas of Eastern Barents region,” J. Geochem. Explor. 83 (1–3). 530 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2004.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. G. Tóth, T. Hermann, G. Szatmári, and L. Pásztor, “Maps of heavy metals in the soils of the European Union and proposed priority areas for detailed assessment,” Sci. Total Environ. 565, 1054–1062 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. P. Tregubova, G. Koptsik, and A. Stepanov, “Remediation of degraded soils: effect of organic additives on soil properties and heavy metals’ bioavailability,” IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 368, 012054 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/368/1/012054

  25. A. D. Watkinson, A. S. Lock, P. J. Beckett, and G. Spiers, “Developing manufactured soils from industrial by-products for use as growth substrates in mine reclamation,” Restor. Ecol. 25 (4), 587–594 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. K. Winterhalder, “Environmental degradation and rehabilitation of the landscape around Sudbury, a major mining and smelting area,” Environ. Rev. 4, 185–122 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1139/a96-011

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors are grateful to M.S. Kadulin, Yu.V. Kupriyanova, E.A. Mitireva, and A.D. Volkov (Faculty of Soil Science, Lomonosov Moscow State University) for their assistance in the field works.

Funding

Experimental studies were supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project no. 18-04-01028; and mathematical processing was performed within the framework of the state assignment of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation no. АААА-А20-120092490029-8.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119991, Moscow, Russia

    G. N. Koptsik, S. V. Koptsik, I. E. Smirnova & M. A. Sinichkina

Authors
  1. G. N. Koptsik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. V. Koptsik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. I. E. Smirnova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. A. Sinichkina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. N. Koptsik.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Translated by I. Bel’chenko

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koptsik, G.N., Koptsik, S.V., Smirnova, I.E. et al. Remediation of Technogenic Barren Soils in the Kola Subarctic: Current State and Long-Term Dynamics. Eurasian Soil Sc. 54, 619–630 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229321040098

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229321040098

Keywords:

Search

Navigation