Skip to main content
Log in

Physical Indicators and Mechanism of Vertisolization: A Case Study of the Cis-Caucasian Vertic Chernozem

  • SOIL PHYSICS
  • Published:
Eurasian Soil Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Vertisolization —the development of vertic properties and vertic horizons—is a widespread process leading to adverse physical and technological properties of chernozems.. There is still no generally accepted theory of the genesis of this phenomenon, although it is a priori clear that the physicochemical mechanisms of the interaction between fine particles and soil water in swell–shrink cycles are the underlying factors. Patterns of the dynamics of the main categories of soil porosity in dependence on the soil water content have been studied at a quantitative level in the genetic horizons of a Cis-Caucasian vertic leached chernozem (Luvic Chernozem (Epiloamic, Katoclayic, Aric, Novic, Bathyvertic)) in comparison with a chernozem without vertic properties. The physical state of vertic soils is represented by structural diagrams of porosity as a function of the specific volumes of various pore categories depending on the volumetric water content. The diagrams are constructed using the experimental data on the textural porosity of aggregates obtained by saturating individual aggregates with a nonpolar liquid (toluene) and humidification with hot water vapor and a fundamental ionic electrostatic model of the disjoining pressure. Vertisolization is characterized by a significant reduction in the textural porosity and a predominance of specific volumes of the external pore space (cracks and interaggregate voids) in the overall structure of the porous dispersed system. The most likely cause of vertisolization is a sharp (twofold) decrease in the effective width of the electrical double layer in the dispersed system with an increase in the particle interaction through stable layers of liquid phase (compaction effect). In turn, this brings about adverse technological properties of the vertic chernozems and lumpy fragmentation upon drying with the formation of large cracks, which complicates their tillage and agricultural activities in general.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The following designations are used: m is mass (kg) with the subscripts 0 for the initial (air-dry) state; sat for the soil saturated with nonpolar liquid, and w for wetted soil; ρ is density (kg/m3) with the subscripts b for bulk density, s for solid phase, a for aggregates, tol for toluene, and l for water; W is weight water content (%) or the equivalent specific water volume (10–5 m3/kg) with the subscripts h for hydroscopic water, а for adsorbed strongly bound water, and т for melting state; D is the textural density or equivalent specific volume of the textural pore space (10–5 m3/kg) with the subscripts lim for limit, g for the pore space filled with gas (air), and т for melting; V is the specific volumes of the pore space (10–5 m3/kg) with the subscripts t for total; g for filled with gas (air); c for cracks, gaps between aggregates, channels, macropores, or open void space; S is specific surface (m2/g) with the subscript BET for the BET-based estimation according to the isotherms of water vapor desorption; λ is the effective width of electrical double layer (m); Pos is “osmotic” pressure (Pa); Es is the surface energy of the interaction between solid and liquid phases (J/kg) according to [2]; P is disjoining pressure; b (kg/kg) and a (J/kg) are parameters of the fundamental ionic electrostatic model of the disjoining pressure according to [30, 31]; and A is a physically grounded parameter of the exponential model for textural porosity dependence on the water content, Eq. (10) (10–5 m3/kg).

REFERENCES

  1. E. V. Arinushkina, Manual for the Chemical Analysis of Soils (Moscow State Univ., Moscow, 1970) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. N. Berezin, “Structural-functional and hydrophysical properties of swelling soils,” in Modern Physical and Chemical Methods of Soil Studies (Moscow State Univ., Moscow, 1987), pp. 20–46.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. N. Berezin, Doctoral Dissertation in Biology (Moscow, 1995).

  4. A. F. Vadyunina and Z. A. Korchagina, Methods for Studying Soil Physical Properties (Agropromizdat, Moscow, 1986) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. D. Voronin, P. N. Berezin, E. V. Shein, and I. I. Gudima, “Methods and devices for evaluation of structural and hydrophysical properties of soils,” in Modern Physical and Chemical Methods of Soil Studies (Moscow State Univ., Moscow, 1987), pp. 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. G. Doyarenko, Selected Research Works (Sel’khozgiz, Moscow, 1963) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  7. N. V. Eliseeva, “Physical properties and regime of vertic chernozems of Western Cis-Caucasus,” Pochvovedenie, No. 4, 56–63 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. I. Zlochevskaya and G. L. Alekseenko, “Physicochemical processes during compaction of water-saturated clays,” in Bound Water in Disperse Systems (Moscow State Univ., Moscow, 1977), pp. 16–34.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. I. Zlochevskaya and V. I. Divisilova, “Dependence of clay swelling on temperature,” in Bound Water in Disperse Systems (Moscow State Univ., Moscow, 1977), pp. 59–68.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. V. Karakin, “Compaction with multiphase fluid,” Fiz. Zemli, No. 9, 12–20 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. M. Kremer, “Heterogeneity of the soil cover as a self-organizing system,” in The Pattern of Spatial Variation of Soil Properties and Information-Statistic Study Methods (Nauka, Moscow, 1979), pp. 68–80.

    Google Scholar 

  12. I. V. Kovda, “Possible vertigenesis in Siberian soils,” in Proceedings of the All-Russia Conference with International Participation “Soil Resources of Siberia: Challenges of the 21st Century” (Tomsk, 2017), pp. 82–85.

  13. E. M. Samoilova, Vertisols and Vertic Soils (Moscow State Univ., Moscow, 1990) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. V. Smagin, N. B. Sadovnikova, M. V. Glagolev, and A. V. Kirichenko, “New instrumental methods and portative electronic devices for control of ecological status of soils and neighboring media,” Ekol. Vestn. Sev. Kavk. 2 (1), 5–16 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Theories and Methods of Soil Physics (Grif i K, Moscow, 2007) [in Russian].

  16. N. B. Khitrov, E. P. Zazovskaya, and L. V. Rogovneva, “Morphology, radiocarbon age, and genesis of Vertisols of the Eisk Peninsula (the Kuban–Azov Lowland),” Eurasian Soil Sci. 51, 731–743 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229318070050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. E. V. Shein, Lectures on Soil Physics (Moscow State Univ., Moscow, 2005) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  18. S. S. Al-Ismaily, A. K. Al-Maktoumi, A. R. Kacimov, S. M. Al-Saqri, H. A. Al-Busaidi, and M. H. Al-Haddabi, “Morphed block-crack preferential sedimentation in a reservoir bed: a smart design and evolution in nature,” Hydrol. Sci. J. 58 (8), 1779–1788 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. A. K. Al-Maktoumi, S. S. Al-Ismaily, A. R. Kacimov, H. A. Al-Busaidi, S. M. Al-Saqri, and M. H. Haddabi, “Soil substrate as a cascade of capillary barriers for conserving water in a desert environment: lessons learned from arid nature,” J Arid Land. 6 (6), 690–703 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-014-0068-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. R. Dudal, “Dark clay soils of tropical and subtropical regions,” Soil Sci. 95 (4), 264–270 (1963).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. IUSS Working Group WRB, World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014, Updated 2015, International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps, World Soil Resources Reports No. 106 (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 2015).

  22. A. R. Kacimov, A. K. Al-Maktoumi, S. S. Al-Ismaily, and H. A. Al-Busaidi, “Moisture and temperature in a proppant-enveloped silt block of a recharge dam reservoir: Laboratory experiment and 1-D mathematical modeling,” J. Agric. Mar. Sci. 22 (1), 8–17 (2017). https://doi.org/10.24200/jams.vol22iss1pp8-17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. N. B. Khitrov, “The choice of diagnostic criteria to judge the development of vertic properties in soils,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 36, 1027–1036 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  24. N. B. Khitrov, “Vertigenesis in soils of the central chernozemic region of Russia,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 45, 834–842 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. N. B. Khitrov, “Vertisols with gilgai microtopography: classification and parameters of microtopography and morphological types of soils (a review),” Eurasian Soil Sci. 49, 125–144 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. N. B. Khitrov and D. D. Khaydapova, “Viscoelastic behavior of vertic solonetz in the Kamennaya Steppe,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 52, 808–821 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229319070056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. N. B. Khitrov, D. I. Rukhovich, A. V. Bryzzhev, N. V. Kalinina, L. V. Rogovneva, and V. P. Vlasenko, “The geography of Vertisols and vertic soils in the Kuban-Azov lowland,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 48, 671–688 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. I. V. Kovda and L. P. Wilding, “Vertisols: problems of classification, evolution, and spatial self-organization,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 37, 1341–1351 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  29. A. V. Smagin, “About thermodynamic theory of water retention capacity and dispersity of soils,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 51, 782–796 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. A. V. Smagin, “Ionic-electrostatic model of the wedge pressure and specific surface area of colloidal systems,” J. Eng. Phys. Thermophys. 92 (3), 744–755 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10891-019-01986-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. A. V. Smagin, “Theory and methods of evaluating the physical status of soils,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 36, 301–312 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  32. A. V. Smagin, N. B. Sadovnikova, A. V. Kirichenko, Yu. V. Egorov, V. G. Vityazev, and A. S. Bashina, “Dependence of the osmotic pressure and electrical conductivity of soil solutions on the soil water content,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 51, 1440–1451 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. I. I. Sudnitsyn, A. V. Smagin, and A. P. Shvarov, “The theory of Maxwell-Boltzmann-Helmholtz-Gouy about the double electric layer in disperse systems and its application to soil science (on the 100th anniversary of the paper published by Gouy),” Eurasian Soil Sci. 45, 452–457 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. W. Zech and G. Hintermaier-Erhard, Böden der Welt: Ein Bildatlas (Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Berlin, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project no. 19-29-05006\19).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. V. Smagin.

Additional information

Translated by G. Chirikova

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Smagin, A.V. Physical Indicators and Mechanism of Vertisolization: A Case Study of the Cis-Caucasian Vertic Chernozem. Eurasian Soil Sc. 53, 902–912 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229320070157

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229320070157

Keywords: