Skip to main content
Log in

Mapping and Assessment of Sealing Rate of Soils in the City of Volgograd

  • DEGRADATION, REHABILITATION, AND CONSERVATION OF SOILS
  • Published:
Eurasian Soil Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The results of mapping and assessing the sealing rate of soils in the city of Volgograd (Russian Federation) are presented. Soil mapping is based on the interpretation of satellite photographs with further control of its results by field surveys at 35 plots within different functional zones of the city. According to the results of the interpretation of satellite images, the portion of sealed areas determined for the functional zones ranged from 0 to 99%, including soils under buildings and roads. The MapInfoProfessional 10.0 software was used to process the obtained data. Based on the results of this assessment, which was performed for the first time within the new boundaries of the city, we quantified the areas of particular soil types and associations of both natural and anthropogenic origin, as well as the sealing rate of soils. The natural soils in Volgograd are dominated (25.86%) by chestnut soils of various texture and alkalinity [23] (Cambisols and Cambisols (Sodic)), and there are 18.67% of natural surface-transformed textural-carbonate agrozems (Cambisols (Aric, Protocalcic)). The range of anthropogenically transformed soils is wide, including the sealed soils (Ekranic Technosols), urbostratozems (Urbic Technosols), chemically contaminated urbostratozems (Technosols (Toxic)), and quasizems (Urbic Technosols). Anthropogenically transformed soils mostly occur in the eastern part of the city, and natural soils dominate its western part. The total portion of sealed surfaces is 18% of the Volgograd area. The calculation is based on the assessment for particular functional zones of the city. The results can be used to solve problems of spatial planning within the modern functional zones and implementation of works on gardening and landscaping of the urban area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. B. F. Aparin and E. Yu. Sukhacheva, “Principles of soil mapping of a megalopolis with St. Petersburg as an example,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 47, 650–661 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. D. V. Vlasov, N. S. Kasimov, and N. E. Kosheleva, “Mapping of landscape and geochemical structure of urban territory (Moscow case study),” InterCarto/InterGIS 23 (1), 242–255 (2017). https://doi.org/10.24057/2414-9179-2017-1-23-242-255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. T. A. Evstifeeva and M. Yu. Glukhovskaya, “Ecological description of the target reorganization of protective plantations of Orenburg city,” Vestn. Vost.-Sib. Gos. Univ. Tekhnol. Upr., No. 1, 42–48 (2016).

  4. O. Z. Eremchenko, I. E. Shestakov, and N. V. Moskvina, Soils and Technogenic Surface Formations of Urban Territories of Perm Area of Kama Region (Perm State Univ., Perm, 2016) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  5. I. V. Zamotaev and V. P. Belobrov, “Classification of soils and soil-like formations of football fields,” Byull. Pochv. Inst. im. V.V. Dokuchaeva, No. 79, 91–110 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  6. V. B. Kalmanova, “Geoecological mapping of urban areas (by the example of Birobidzhan),” InterCarto/InterGIS 21, 566–574 (2015). https://doi.org/10.24057/2414-9179-2015-1-21-566-574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Classification and Diagnostics of Soils of the USSR (Kolos, Moscow, 1977) [in Russian].

  8. O. Yu. Kosheleva, “Evaluation of isolation degree of urban territory by computer-based interpretation of satellite images,” in Proceedings of International Scientific-Practical Conf., Voronezh, October 4–6,2017 (Voronezh, 2017), pp. 156–159.

  9. K. N. Kulik, A. S. Rulev, and O. Yu. Kosheleva, “Soil cover of urban territories: identification and mapping according to satellite images,” Probl. Reg. Ekol., No. 3, 121–125 (2015).

  10. K. N. Kulik, V. M. Kretitnin, and O. Yu. Kosheleva, “Mapping of soil cover of Volgograd city,” Vestn. Voronezh. Gos. Univ., Ser. Geogr., Geoekol., No. 1, 40–45 (2014).

  11. E. M. Nikiforova, N. E. Kosheleva, and T. S. Khaibrakhanov, “Ecological-geochemical evaluation of sealed soils of eastern Moscow,” Vestn. Ross. Univ. Druzhby Narodov, Ser. Ekol. Bezop. Zhiznedeyatel’nosti 25 (4), 480–509 (2017). https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2310-2017-25-4-480-509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. A. A. Okolelova, V. F. Zheltobryukhov, G. S. Egorova, N. G. Kasterina, and A. S. Merzlyakova, Specificity of the Soil Cover of Volgograd Agglomeration (Volgograd, 2014) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  13. Soil, City, and Ecology, Ed. by G. V. Dobrovol’skii (Moscow, 1997) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  14. T. V. Prokof’eva, Candidate’s Dissertation in Biology (Moscow, 1998).

  15. T. V. Prokof’eva, I. A. Martynenko, A. S. Yakovlev, and M. V. Evdokimova, “Analysis of urban soils for mapping and determination of their ecological quality,” in Guide for Analysis of Urban Environment:Ecological and Social-Psychological Aspects (Moscow, 2015) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  16. T. V. Prokof’eva, I. A. Martynenko, A. S. Yakovlev, and M. V. Evdokimova, “Urban soils: classification, mapping, analysis, and ecological quality and standardization,” in Ecological Standardization and Quality Management of Soils and Lands (NIA-Priroda, Moscow, 2013), pp. 202–218.

    Google Scholar 

  17. T. V. Prokof’eva, M. N. Stroganova, A. D. Myagkova, and A. A. Gubankov, “Soils and a soil map of Moscow,” in Ecological Atlas of Moscow City (ABF, Moscow, 2000), pp. 17–18.

    Google Scholar 

  18. T. V. Prokof’eva, M. I. Gerasimova, O. S. Bezuglova, K. A. Bakhmatova, A. A. Gol’eva, S. N. Gorbov, E. A. Zharikova, N. N. Matinyan, E. N. Nakvasina, and N. E. Sivtseva, “Inclusion of soils and soil-like bodies of urban territories into the Russian soil classification system,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 47, 959–967 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. I. Yu. Savin, “Mapping of sealed soils of Moscow agglomeration according to Landsat satellite data,” Issled. Zemli Kosm., No. 5, 55–61 (2013). https://doi.org/10.7868/S0205961413050084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. M. N. Stroganova, Doctoral Dissertation in Biology (Moscow, 1998).

  21. T. S. Khaibrakhmanov, E. M. Nikiforova, and N. E. Kosheleva, “Cartographic support of environmental and geochemical evaluation of sealed soils on urbanized territories,” InterCarto/InterGIS 23 (1), 256–266 (2017). https://doi.org/10.24057/2414-9179-2017-1-23-256-266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. I. E. Shestakov, O. Z. Eremchenko, and T. G. Fil’kin, “Approaches toward soil mapping of urban territories with the city of Perm as an example,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 46, 1130–1138 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229314010104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. L. L. Shishov, V. D. Tonkonogov, I. I. Lebedeva, and M. I. Gerasimova, Classification and Diagnostic System of Russian Soils (Oikumena, Smolensk, 2004) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  24. P. Charzynski, J. M. Galbraith, D. Kuhn, C. Kabala, T. V. Prokofeva, and V. I. Vasenev, “Classification of urban soils,” in Soils within Cities: Global Approaches to Their Sustainable Management: Composition, Properties, and Functions of Soils of the Urban Environment (Catena-Schweizerbart, Stuttgart, 2017), pp. 93–106.

  25. A. A. Cortijo and M. E. P. González, “Soil sealing in Madrid (Spain), study case of Colmenar Viejo,” Earth Sci. Res. J. 21 (3), 111–116 (2017). https://doi.org/10.15446/esrj.v21n3.51450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. P. García and E. Pérez, “Mapping of soil sealing by vegetation indexes and built-up index: A case study in Madrid (Spain),” Geoderma 268, 100–107 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.01.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. P. García and E. Pérez, “Monitoring soil sealing in Guadarrama River basin, Spain, and its potential impact in agricultural areas,” Agriculture 6, 1–11 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture6010007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. IUSS Working Group WRB, World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014, Updated 2015, International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps, World Soil Resources Reports No. 106 (Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, 2015).

  29. V. B. Kalmanova and L. A. Matiushkina, “Mapping of soil-ecological conditions of a medium-size industrial city (Birobidzhan city, Jewish Autonomous oblast, Far East of Russia as an example),” IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 107, 1–7 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/107/1/012115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. M. Knotters and H. R. J. Vroon, “The economic value of detailed soil survey in a drinking water collection area in the Netherlands,” Geoderma Reg. 5, 44–53 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2015.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. L. Makowsky, J. Schneider, P. Charzynski, P. Hulisz, T. V. Prokofeva, and I. A. Martynenko, “Urban soils surveys,” in Soils within Cities: Global Approaches to Their Sustainable Management: Composition, Properties, and Functions of Soils of the Urban Environment (Catena-Schweizerbart, Stuttgart, 2017), pp. 93–138.

  32. N. N. Dan, L. G. Ping, and L. P. C. Lang, “Land unit mapping and evaluation of land suitability for agro-forestry in Thua Thien Hue province—Vietnam as an example,” Earth Environ. Sci. 159, 1–10 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/159/1/012012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. S. Pindral, P. Hulisz, and P. Charzyński, “Changes in land use and soil cover (1934–2010) in Inowroclaw city, central Poland as a result of the urban sprawl,” in Proceedings of the 9th International Congr. “Soils of Urban Industrial Traffic Mining and Military Areas,” May 22–26,2017 (Moscow, 2017), pp. 39–42.

  34. S.-Y. Liang, A. Lehmann, K.-N. Wu, and K. Stahr, “Perspectives of function-based soil evaluation in land-use planning in China,” J. Soils Sediments 14, 10–22 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-013-0787-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. X. Zhang, J. Chen, M. Tan, and Y. Sun, “Assessing the impact of urban sprawl on soil resources of Nanjing city using satellite images and digital soil databases,” Catena 69, 16–30 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2006.04.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. M. Zaouchea, L. Bela, and E. Vaudour, “Geostatistical mapping of topsoil organic carbon and uncertainty assessment in Western Paris croplands (France),” Geoderma Reg. 10, 126–137 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2017.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. V. Manaenkov.

Additional information

Translated by I. Bel’chenko

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gordienko, O.A., Manaenkov, I.V., Kholodenko, A.V. et al. Mapping and Assessment of Sealing Rate of Soils in the City of Volgograd. Eurasian Soil Sc. 52, 1439–1446 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S106422931911005X

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S106422931911005X

Keywords: