Skip to main content
Log in

Changes in the Content, Composition, and Properties of Humic Substances in Particle-Size Fractions of Soddy-Podzolic Soils under the Impact of Long-Term Drainage

  • Soil Chemistry
  • Published:
Eurasian Soil Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Specific features of the transformation of humic substances in particle-size fractions of drained soddy-podzolic soils were studied on a field (12 ha) of the Experimental and Educational Center of Lomonosov Moscow State University in Moscow oblast. The field had a clearly pronounced microtopography. Surface-gleyed soddy-podzolic soils (Albic Stagnic Glossic Retisols (Loamic, Aric, Ochric)) of microdepressions with excessive surface moistening and nongleyed soddy-podzolic soils (Albic Glossic Retisols (Loamic, Aric, Ochric)) of elevated positions were examined. These soils were studied before the field drainage and during 25 years after drainage works in the periods differing in conditions of humification and with due account for not only drainage works but also other factors, such as topography and agrotechnology and their joint action. The specificity of transformation of humic substances in the soils and their particle-size fractions was analyzed in the basis of data on the organic carbon content, group and fractional composition of humus, the intensity of individual stages of humification (the neoformation of humic acids and the formation of humates), and the optical density of the fractions of humic acids. The results of the study of these properties in the fine soil fractions (<50 μm) made it possible to assess the response of the clay (<1 μm) and silt (1–5, 5–10, 10–50 μm) fractions to changes in the ecological situation and the role of separate particle-size fractions in the degradation of humus under adverse impacts. Overall, a clear tendency toward worsening of the humus quality was observed in both soils during the 25-year-long period, which is related to the long-term (20 years) agricultural use of the reclaimed field without application of agrochemicals. The features of humus degradation were mainly manifested in the finest (<10 μm) fractions with a general decrease in the humus content, slowing down of the formation of humic acids and humates, and considerable loss of humic acids, including their agronomically valuable fractions HA1 and HA2. The degradation of humus quality in the clay fraction was largely due to the impact of the reclamation (drainage) factor; the degradation of humus quality in the fine and medium silt fractions was mainly due to the negative changes in the agricultural background. Among negative consequences of the worsening humus quality, the lowering of soil fertility, ecological sustainability, and productivity of agrocenoses should be noted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. Kh. Aidinyan, “Non-chemical extraction of soil colloids,” Kolloidn. Zh. 9 (1), 3–12 (1947).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Z. S. Artemyeva, Doctoral Dissertation in Biology (Moscow, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Z. S. Artemyeva, “Organo-mineral profiles of agrogenic eroded ordinary chernozems in the western part of the central chernozemic region,” Agrokhimiya, No. 3, 5–12 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Z. S. Artemyeva, I. M. Ryzhova, T. M. Sileva, and A. A. Erokhova, “Organic carbon stabilization in microaggregates of sod-podzolic soils depending on land use,” Moscow Univ. Soil Sci. Bull. 68, 116–122 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. V. P. Vlasenko, “Development of hydromorphism in soils of agrolandscapes in the depressions of Western Ciscaucasia,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 42, 488–495 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. E. I. Gagarina and N. N. Matinyan, “Chemical and mineralogical composition of clay fractions in drained soils on varved clay,” Pochvovedenie, No. 3, 55–63 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  7. B. A. Dospekhov, Field Experiments with the Principles of Statistical Treatment of Data (Al’yans, Moscow, 2011) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  8. F. R. Zaidel’man, “Hydrological factor of anthropogenic degradation of soils and the methods of its control,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 33, 1118–1128 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  9. F. R. Zaidel’man, “Hydromorphic soils: genesis, melioration, and ecology,” Proceedings of the All-Russia Scientific Conference, July 8–12, 2002 (Moscow, 2002), pp. 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  10. B. M. Kogut, E. Schulz, N. A. Titova, and V. A. Kholodov, “Organic matter of densigranulometric fractions from virgin and plowed typical chernozems,” Agrokhimiya, No. 8, 3–9 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  11. V. S. Kryshchenko, E. F. Ryazanova, A. Ya. Vigutova, and T. V. Rybyanets, “Distribution of humus by granulometric fractions of ordinary chernozems under different anthropogenic load,” Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved., Sev.-Kavk. Reg., Estestv. Nauki, No. 3, 64–68 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yu. V. Kuvaeva and A. S. Frid, “Dynamics of the organic matter associated with finely dispersed particles of soddy-podzolic soils in conditions of long-term experiments,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 34, 43–51 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  13. I. N. Matinyan, “Natural and anthropogenic evolution of clayey surface-eluvial gleyed soils,” Proceedings of the All-Russia Scientific-Practical Conference “Hydromorphic Soils: Genesis, Remediation, and Use” (Moscow State Univ., Moscow, 2002), p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. F. Ovchinnikova, Humus Degradation under Different Environmental Conditions (Tvorcheskii Litsei, Moscow, 2012) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. F. Ovchinnikova, “Transformation of humus substances in the long-drained surface-gleyed soddypodzolic soils under conditions of pronounced microrelief and different agrogenic loads,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 49, 859–867 (2016). doi 10.1134/S106422931608010X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. M. F. Ovchinnikova, “Features of natural stability and agrogenic transformation of soil humus,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 46, 1150–1163 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. D. S. Orlov, O. N. Biryukova, and M. S. Rozanova, “Revised system of the humus status parameters of soils and their genetic horizons,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 37, 798–805 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  18. T. A. Plotnikova and N. E. Orlova, “Application of a modified Ponomareva–Plotnikova method for determination of the composition, nature, and properties of soil humus,” Pochvovedenie, No. 8, 120–130 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  19. E. A. Poluektova, Candidate’s Dissertation in Biology (Kirov, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  20. V. V. Ponomareva and T. A. Plotnikova, Humus and Soil Formation (Nauka, Leningrad, 1980) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  21. Practicum on Agrochemistry (Moscow State Univ., Moscow, 2001) [in Russian].

  22. N. A. Titova and Yu. V. Kuvaeva, “Composition of organic matter of fine particles of soddy-podzolic soils of different fertility degrees,” in Organic Matter of Arable Soils (Dokuchaev Soil Science Inst., Moscow, 1987), pp. 69–75.

    Google Scholar 

  23. N. A. Titova, L. S. Travnikova, B. M. Kogut, and M. Korschens, “Soil organic matter and sustainability of agriculture in the 21st century: relationships between active and inert parts of the organic matter of chernozems in the long-term field experiments,” in Modern Problems of Soil Science (Dokuchaev Soil Science Inst., Moscow, 2000), pp. 369–383.

    Google Scholar 

  24. N. A. Titova, L. S. Travnikova, Yu. V. Kuvaeva, and I. V. Volodarskaya, “Composition of fine particles of arable soddy-podzolic soil,” Pochvovedenie, No. 6, 89–97 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  25. N. A. Titova, L. S. Travnikova, and M. Sh. Shaimukhametov, “Interaction of organic and mineral soil components,” Pochvovedenie, No. 5, 639–646 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  26. S. A. Tishchenko and O. S. Bezuglova, “The humus state of the soils of locally hydromorphic landscapes in the lower reaches of the Don River,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 45, 132–140 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. S. A. Tishchenko, O. S. Bezuglova, and I. V. Morozov, “Specificity of the physical properties of soils in locally waterlogged landscapes in the lower reaches of the Don River,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 46, 297–302 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. L. S. Travnikova, “Patterns of humus accumulation: new data and their interpretation,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 35, 737–748 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  29. L. S. Travnikova, Z. S. Artem’eva, and N. P. Sorokina, “Distribution of the particle-size fractions in soddypodzolic soils subjected to sheet erosion,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 43, 459–467 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. L. S. Travnikova, T. M. Sileva, I. M. Ryzhova, Z. S. Artemyeva, and N. P. Chizhikova, “Composition of the elements of microaggregates of chernozems of Volga forest-steppe,” Agrokhimiya, No. 8, 10–17 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  31. L. S. Travnikova, N. A. Titova, and M. Sh. Shaimukhametov, “The role of the products of interaction between the organic and mineral parts in the genesis and fertility of soils,” Pochvovedenie, No. 10, 81–96 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  32. L. S. Travnikova and M. Sh. Shaimukhametov, “Products of organo-mineral interaction and soil tolerance toward degradation,” in Modern Problems of Soil Science (Dokuchaev Soil Science Inst., Moscow, 2000), pp. 356–368.

    Google Scholar 

  33. D. V. Khan, “Composition of humic substances and their relation with the mineral soil component,” Pochvovedenie, No. 1, 10–18 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  34. D. V. Khan, Organomineral Compounds and Soil Structure (Nauka, Moscow, 1969) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  35. M. Asano and R. Wagai, “Distinctive organic matter pools among particle–size fractions detected by solid–state 13C-NMR, δ 13C and δ 15N analyses only after strong dispersion in an allophanic andisol,” Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 61, 242–248 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. T. A. Bonde, B. T. Christensen, and C. C. Cerri, “Dynamics of soil organic matter as reflected by natural 13C abundance in particle-size fractions of forested and cultivated Oxisols,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 24, 275–277 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. G. Catroux and M. Schnitzer, “Chemical, spectroscopic and biological characteristics of the organic matter in particle-size fractions separated from Aquoll,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 51 (5), 1200–1207 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. B. T. Christensen, “Physical fractionation of soil and structural and functional complexity in organic matter turnover,” Eur. J. Soil Sci. 52 (3), 345–353 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. R. C. Dalal and R. J. Mayer, “Long-term trends in fertility of Soils under continuous cultivation and cereal cropping in Southern Queensland,” Austral. J. Soil Res. 24, 301–309 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. A. Golchin, J. M. Oades, J. O. Skjemstad, and P. Clarke, “Study of free and occluded particulate organic matter in soils by solid state 13C CP/MAS NMR spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy,” Austral. J. Soil Res. 32, 285–309 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. G. Guggenberger, W. Zech, L. Haumaier, and B. T. Christensen, “Land-use effects on the composition of organic matter in particle-size separated of soils: II. CPMAS and solution 13C NMR analysis,” Eur. J. Soil Sci. 46, 147–158 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. K. Kaiser, K. Eusterhues, C. Rumpel, G. Guggenberger, and J. Kögel–Knabner, “Stabilization of organic matter by soil minerals-investigations of density and particle–size fractions from two acid forest soils,” J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 165, 451–459 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. D. Laird, “Nature of clay-humic complexes in an agricultural soil: Scanning electron microscopy analysis,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 65 (5), 1419–1425 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. D. A. Laird, D. A. Martens, and W. L. Kingery, “Nature of clay-humic complexes in an agricultural soil: chemical, biochemical and spectroscopic analysis,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 65 (5), 1413–1418 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. J. M. Oades, A. M. Vassallo, A. G. Waters, and M. A. Wilson, “Characterization of organic matter in particle-size and density fractions from a red-brown earth by solid state 13C NMR,” Aust. J. Soil Res. 25, 71–82 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. A. Piccolo and J. S. C. Mbagwu, “Effects of different organic waste amendments of soil microaggregates stability and molecule sizes of humic substances,” Plant Soil 123, 27–37 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. M. Schnitzer, J. A. Ripmeester, and H. Kodama, “Characterization of the organic matter associated with a soil clay,” Soil Sci. 145 (6), 448–458 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. D. Solomon, F. Fritzsche, J. Lehmann, M. Tekalign, and W. Zech, “Soil organic matter dynamics in the subhumid agroecosystems of the Ethiopian highlands: evidence from natural 13C abundance and particle-size fractionation,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 66 (969–978 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. J. Tarchitzky, P. G. Hatcher, and J. Chen, “Properties and distribution of humic substances and inorganic structure-stabilizing components in particle-size fractions of cultivated Mediterranean soils,” Soil Sci. 165 (4), 328–342 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. F. Ovchinnikova.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © M.F. Ovchinnikova, 2018, published in Pochvovedenie, 2018, No. 6, pp. 693–703.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ovchinnikova, M.F. Changes in the Content, Composition, and Properties of Humic Substances in Particle-Size Fractions of Soddy-Podzolic Soils under the Impact of Long-Term Drainage. Eurasian Soil Sc. 51, 647–657 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229318060121

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229318060121

Keywords

Navigation