Eurasian Soil Science

, Volume 51, Issue 4, pp 428–433 | Cite as

Infiltration Variability in Agricultural Soil Aggregates Caused by Air Slaking

  • L. Korenkova
  • M. Urik
Soil Physics


This article reports on variation in infiltration rates of soil aggregates as a result of phenomenon known as air slaking. Air slaking is caused by the compression and subsequent escape of air captured inside soil aggregates during water saturation. Although it has been generally assumed that it occurs mostly when dry aggregates are rapidly wetted, the measurements used for this paper have proved that it takes place even if the wetting is gradual, not just immediate. It is a phenomenon that contributes to an infiltration variability of soils. In measuring the course of water flow through the soil, several small aggregates of five agricultural soils were exposed to distilled water at zero tension in order to characterize their hydraulic properties. Infiltration curves obtained for these aggregates demonstrate the effect of entrapped air on the increase and decrease of infiltration rates. The measurements were performed under various moisture conditions of the A-horizon aggregates using a simple device.


aggregate breakdown moisture content aggregate stability rainfall simulation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    W. W. Emerson, “The slaking of soil crumbs as influenced by clay mineral composition,” Aust. J. Soil Res. 2, 211–217 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    W. W. Emerson, “Physical properties and structure,” in Soil Factors in Crop Production in a Semi-Arid Environment, Ed. by J. S. Russell and E. L. Greacen (University of Queensland Press, St. Lucia, 1977), pp. 78–104.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    W. W. Emerson, “Structural decline of soils, assessment and prevention”, Aust. J. Soil Res. 29, 905–921 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Guidelines for Soil Description (Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, 2006).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. J. Farres, “The dynamics of rainsplash erosion and the role of soil aggregate stability,” Catena 14, 119–130 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    K. Fiala, J. Kobza, L. Matúšková, V. Breková, J. Makovníková, G. Baraníková, et al., Definite Methods of Soil Analyses, Sub-Monitoring System–Soil (Vys-kumny Ustav Podoznalectva Ochrany Pody, Bratislava, 1999) [in Slovak].Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. C. Fies, P. Stengel, M. Bourlet, J. Horoyan, and C. Jeandet, “Densité texturale de sols naturels II.— Eléments d’interprétation,” Agronomie 1, 659–666 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. Hillel, Environmental Soil Physics (Academic, London, 1998).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Hraško, L. Cervenka, Z. Facek, J. Komár, J. Nemecek, et al., Soil Analyses (Slovak Agricultural Literature Publishing, Bratislava, 1962) [in Slovak].Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    IUSS Working Group WRB, World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014, International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps, World Soil Resources Reports No. 106 (Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, 2014).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    W. D. Kemper, and E. J. Koch, Aggregate Stability of Soils from Western United States and Canada: Measurement Procedure, Correlations with Soil Constituents (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, 1966).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    W. D. Kemper, R. Rosenau, and S. Nelson, “Gas displacement and aggregate stability of soils,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 49, 25–28 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    L. Korenkova and P. Matus, “Role of water repellency in aggregate stability of cultivated soils under simulated raindrop impact,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 48, 754–758 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    G. A. Larionov, O. G. Bushueva, N. G. Dobrovol’skaya, Z. P. Kiryukhina, L. F. Litvin, and I. A. Maksimova, “Destruction of soil aggregates in slope flows,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 40, 1128–1134 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Y. Le Bissonnais, “Stabilité structurale et évaluation de la sensibilité des sols à la battance et à l'érosion: I: Théorie et méthologie,” Eur. J. Soil Sci. 47, 425–437 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    P. B. Leeds-Harrison, E. G. Youngs, and B. Uddin, “A device for determining the sorptivity of soil aggregates,” Eur. J. Soil Sci. 45, 269–272 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Z. X. Li, C. F. Cai, Z. H. Shi, and T. W. Wang, “Aggregate stability and its relationship with some chemical properties of red soils in subtropical China,” Pedosphere 15, 129–136 (2005).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    M. M. Mortland, and W. D. Kemper, “Specific surface,” in Methods of Soil Analysis, Ed. by C. A. Black (American Society of Agronomy, Madison, 1965), pp. 532–544.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    P. Rengasamy, R. S. B. Greene, and G. W. Ford, “The role of clay fraction in the particle arrangement and stability of soil aggregates—a review,” Clay Res. 3, 53–67 (1984).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    A. Roldán, F. García-Orenes, and A. Lax, “An incubation experiment to determinate factors involving aggregation changes in an arid soil receiving urban refuse,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 26, 1699–1707 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    J. Six, H. Bossuyt, S. Degryze, and K. Denef, “A history of research on the link between (micro)aggregates, soil biota, and soil organic matter dynamics,” Soil Tillage Res. 79, 7–31 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    A. Walkley, and I.A. Black, “An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method,” Soil Sci. 37, 29–38 (1934).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Laboratory Research on Geomaterials, Faculty of Natural SciencesComenius UniversityBratislava 4Slovakia

Personalised recommendations