Advertisement

Eurasian Soil Science

, Volume 50, Issue 5, pp 499–514 | Cite as

Agrogenic evolution of automorphic chernozems in the forest-steppe zone (Belgorod oblast)

  • Yu. G. ChendevEmail author
  • O. S. Khokhlova
  • A. L. Alexandrovskiy
Genesis and Geography of Soils

Abstract

Agrochronosequences of chernozems with different periods of their use in rainfed farming with application of traditional technologies have been studied in a typical forest-steppe area in Belgorod oblast. Certain stages in the development of these soils during more than two centuries of their agricultural use have been identified. These stages are related to changes in the intensity and direction of soil forming processes, such as soil compaction, soil aggregation, dehumification of the upper horizons, calcification of the soil profiles, argillization, etc. A significant impact on the soil changes during the agrogenic evolution of chernozems is exerted by the digging activity of burrowers, which is especially pronounced in the old-arable chernozems.

Keywords

chernozems soil agrochronosequences tillage forest-steppe stadial specificity of the agrogenic evolution multiple study methods 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Agroecological Status of Chernozems in the Central Chernozemic Region, Ed. by A. P. Shcherbakov and I. I. Vasenev (Kursk, 1996) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    P. G. Aderikhin, “Transformation of chernozems in the central chernozemic region after agricultural use,” in Chernozems of the Central Chernozem Region and Their Fertility (Nauka, Moscow, 1964), pp. 61–89 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. A. Afanas’eva, Chernozems of the Central Russian Upland (Nauka, Moscow, 1966) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    B. P. Akhtyrtsev and A. B. Akhtyrtsev, “Changes in the humus state of forest-steppe and steppe chernozems resulting from their long-term plowing and sealing under burial mounds,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 35, 123–131 (2002).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    B. P. Akhtyrtsev and G. A. Shevchenko, “Influence of agriculture on gray forest soils in the western part of the central chernozemic region,” Prochvoved. Agrokhim., No. 2, 31–48 (1970).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    B. P. Akhtyrtsev and A. S. Shchetinina, Transformation of Gray Forest Soils of the Central Russian Forest-Steppe Caused by Agricultural Use (Mordovian State Univ., Saransk, 1969) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. S. Bruk, “Transformation of chernozems caused by prolonged agricultural use,” Pochvovedenie, No. 8, 124–127 (1979).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. S. Bruk, “Impact of human activities on evolution of chernozems,” Pochvovedenie, No. 3, 24–32 (1975).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    L. S. Butova, O. A. Parfenova, and A. M. Shcherbakov, “Argillization of chernozems under different uses,” Proceedings of Conf. of Students and Post-Graduate Students on Fundamental Science “Lomonosov-96,” Moscow (Moscow, 1996), p.10.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. V. Gedymin and I. G. Pobedintseva, “Influence of long-term plowing on the properties of ordinary chernozems,” Pochvovedenie, No. 5, 35–46 (1964).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. V. Gedymin and A. T. Kharitonychev, “Use of old cartographic materials for analysis of landscapes,” in {Modern Problems in Geography} (Nauka, Moscow, 1964), pp. 298–302.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. A. Glazovskaya, “Agrogenic transformation of factors and mechanisms of humus reserves in the massifs of arable soils,” Proceedings of IV All-Russian Conf. “Problems of Soil Evolution” (Pushchino, 2003), pp. 201–210.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    P. S. Denisov, Soil of Voronezh and Kursk Oblasts and Their Agricultural Use (Voronezh. Obl. Izd., Voronezh, 1935) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    V. V. Dokuchaev, Russian Chernozem (Imper. Vol’noe Ekon. O-vo, St. Petersburg, 1883) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    I. V. Ivanov and E. D. Tabanakova, “Changes in the thickness of humus horizons and the Holocene evolution of East European chernozems (mechanisms, fac-tors, and regularities),” Eurasian Soil Sci. 36, 917–930 (2003).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    F. I. Kozlovskii, Modern Natural and Anthropogenic Processes in Soil Evolution (Nauka, Moscow, 1991) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    F. I. Kozlovskii, “Evolution of arable soils as a subject of genetic-geographical soil science,” in {Theory and Methods of Study of Soil Cover} (GEOS, Moscow, 2003), pp. 451–463.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    T. P. Kokovina, “Soil processes in the deep typical arable chernozem,” Pochvovedenie, No. 9, 13–23 (1978).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    P. A. Kostychev, “The travel notes. Treatment and fertilization of chernozems,” Sel. Khoz. Lesovod., No. 8, 293–315 (1886).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    P. A. Kostychev, “What is the difference between new steppe soils and arable and fallow soils?” Zemledel’cheskaya Gazeta, No. 35, 620–623 (1881).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    I. A. Krupenikov, Soil Cover of Moldova: Past, Present, Monitoring, and Forecast (Stiintsa, Chisinau, 1992) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    N. S. Kukharuk, Yu. G. Chendev, and A. N. Petin, “Micromorphological features of organic matter upon agrogenic transformation of soils in the forest-steppe zone,” Nauch. Ved. Bel. Gos. Univ., Estestv. Nauki, No. 15, 168–179 (2011).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    A. A. Lazarev, Influence of Crops on the Properties of Forest-Steppe Chernozems (Academy of Sciences of Soviet Union, Moscow, 1936) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    I. I. Lebedeva, “Hydrological profiles of typical chernozems and agrochernozems with migrational forms of pedogenic carbonates,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 35, 1076–1084 (2002).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    V. V. Medvedev, “Physical degradation of chernozem: reasons, consequences, and elimination methods,” in (Nauka, Moscow, 1986), pp. 23–26.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    D. S. Orlov, O. N. Biryukova, and N. I. Sukhanova, Organic Matter of Russian Soils (Nauka, Moscow, 1996) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    A. M. Pankov, “Subzones of chernozem in Voronezh region,” Izv. Dokuchaev. Pochv. Kom., Nos. 1–2, 45–51 (1913).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    A. M. Pankov, Data on Natural and Historical Studies in Voronezh Region, Section IV: Geology and Soils. Valuiskiy Uezd (Moscow, 1922), No.1.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    E. I. Parfenova and E. A. Yarilova, Manual on Micromorphological Studies in Soil Science (Nauka, Moscow, 1977) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Soil-Agrochemical Basis of Sustainable Land Agriculture in the Central Chernozemic Region, Ed. by N. Z. Milashchenko (Agropromizdat, Moscow, 1991) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Provincial maps, county plans, maps, atlases, and town plans, Russian State Archive of Ancient Acts (RGADA), Fund 138, File 157–159.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    M. I. Sidorov, N. I. Khabarov, I. M. Nebol’sin, and N. I. Zezyukov, Efficiency and Improvement of Land Agricultural Systems in the Central Chernozemic Region (Tsentral’no-Chernozem. Knizh. Izd., Voronezh, Voronezh, 1986) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Z. A. Sinkevich, Modern Processes in Chernozems of Moldavia (Shtiintsa, Chisinau, 1989) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    N. P. Sorokina and B. M. Kogut, “The dynamics of humus content in arable chernozems and approaches to its study,” Pochvovedenie, No. 2, 178–184 (1997).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    G. I. Uvarov, Mikhailovskaya virgin land as an object for comparing the properties of virgin and anthropogenic soils in northeastern Ukraine, Inform. Listok (Kharkov) No. 136–97 (1997).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    T. I. Ushacheva and S. S. Zvyagintsev, “Dynamics of morphological properties of dark chestnut residualsolonetzic soils as the result of agricultural use,” Proceedings of International Symp. “Steppes of Northern Eurasia: Strategy of Conservation of Natural Diversity and Steppe Nature Management in 21st Century” (Orenburg, 2000), pp. 385–386.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    O. S. Khokhlova, Yu. G. Chendev, T. N. Myakshina, and V. A. Shishkov, “The pool of pedogenic carbon in the soils of different types and durations of use as croplands in the forest-steppe of the Central Russian Upland,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 46, 530–540 (2013). doi 10.1134/S1064229313050062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Yu. G. Chendev, Evolution of Forest-Steppe Soils of the Central Russian Upland in the Holocene (GEOS, Moscow, 2008) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Y. G. Chendev, A. L. Aleksandrovskii, O. S. Khokhlova, L. G. Smirnova, L. L. Novykh, and A. V. Dolgikh, “Anthropogenic evolution of dark gray forest-steppe soils in the southern part of the Central Russian Upland,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 44, 1–12 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    D. I. Shcheglov, Chernozems of the Central Russian Plain and Their Evolution Affected by Natural and Anthropogenic Factors (Nauka, Moscow, 1999) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    IUSS Working Group WRB, World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014, International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps, World Soil Resources Reports No. 106 (Food Agriculture Organization, Rome, 2014).Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    O. S. Khokhlova, Yu. G. Chendev, and T. N. Myakshina, “Change in pedogenic carbon stocks under different types and duration of agricultural management practices in the central Russian forest steppe,” in Sustainable Agroecosystems in Climate Change Mitigation, Ed. by M. Oelbermann (Wageningen Academic, Wageningen, 2014), pp. 33–52. doi 10.3920/978-90-8686-788-2_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    O. S. Khokhlova, Yu. G. Chendev, T. N. Myakshina, A. L. Alexandrovskiy, and A. A. Khokhlov, “Evolution of Chernozems in the southern forest-steppe of the Central Russian Upland under long-term cultivation examined in the agro-chronosequences,” Quat. Int. 365, 175–189 (2015). doi 10.1016/j.quaint.2014.10.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yu. G. Chendev
    • 1
    Email author
  • O. S. Khokhlova
    • 2
  • A. L. Alexandrovskiy
    • 3
  1. 1.Belgorod National Research UniversityBelgorodRussia
  2. 2.Institute of Physicochemical and Biological Problems of Soil ScienceRussian Academy of SciencesPushchino, Moscow oblastRussia
  3. 3.Institute of GeographyRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations