Skip to main content
Log in

Changes in the species composition of the rhizosphere and phyllosphere of sugar beet under the impact of biological preparations based on endophytic bacteria and their metabolites

  • Soil Biology
  • Published:
Eurasian Soil Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The species structure of the mycobiota in the rhizosphere and phyllosphere of sugar beet in ontogenesis was studied. The treatment of the plants with biopreparations based on endophytic bacteria and their metabolites (Phytosporin-M, Vitaplan, and Albit) were shown to create conditions for the colonization of the plant rhizosphere and phyllosphere by bacteria–antagonists displacing phytopathogenic microorganisms and stimulating plant growth, which induces the transformation of the microbial cenosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. O. I. Borodkin, “Development of microbial community and phytotoxic properties of chernozem in a special rotation system,” Sakharnaya Svekla, No. 8, 14–19 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  2. V. I. Bilai and E. Z. Koval’, Fungi of Genus Aspergillus (Naukova Dumka, Kiev, 1988) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  3. N. V. Bezler, E. V. Grosheva, and M. A. Sumskaya, “Role of bacteria in protection against black root of sugar beet,” Zashch. Karantin Rast., No. 5, 19–21 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. A. Danilova, “Phytotoxic fungi complex in leached chernozem of the Ob River region at different methods of soil cultivation,” S-kh. Biol., No. 3, 108–111 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  5. L. I. Domracheva, T. Ya. Ashikhmina, L. V. Kondakova, and G. I. Berezin, “Response of soil microbiota to pesticides: a review,” Teor. Prikl. Ekol., No. 3, 4–18 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. A. Egorshina, R. M. Khairullin, M. A. Luk’yantsev, and A. R. Sakhabutdinova, “Involvement of phytohormones in the development of interaction between wheat seedlings and endophytic Bacillus subtilis strain 11BM,” Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 59 (1), 134–140 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. A. K. Zlotnikov, V. R. Sergeev, N. A. Kudryavtsev, A. K. Dolgushin, and K. M. Zlotnikov, “Mineral albite improves the herbicide action,” Zemledelie, No. 1, 34–36 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. V. Kornienko, “New classification of sugar beet pathogens,” Agro XXI, Nos. 1–3, 25–29 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  9. G. R. Kudoyarova, I. K. Kurdish, and A. I. Melent’ev, “Synthesis of phytohormones by soil and rhizosphere bacteria as a factor of plant growth stimulation,” Izv. Ufimsk. Nauch. Tsentra, Ross. Akad. Nauk, Nos. 3–4, 5–16 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  10. I. V. Maksimov, R. R. Abizgil’dina, and L. I. Pusenkova, “Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as alternative to chemical crop protectors from pathogens (review),” Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 47 (4), 333–345 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. I. V. Maksimov, L. I. Pusenkova, and R. R. Abizgil’dina, “Biopreparations with endophytic bacterium Bacillus subtilis 26D created post-harvest protecting effect in potato tubers,” Agrokhimiya, No. 6, 43–48 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. I. Melent’ev, Aerobic Cryptogam Bacteria Bacillus Cohn in Agroecosystems (Nauka, Moscow, 2007) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  13. Methods of Soil Microbiology and Biochemistry, Ed. by D. G. Zvyagintsev (Moscow State Univ., Moscow, 1991) [in Russian].

  14. Certification Tests of Fungicides for Agriculture (All-Russian Research Institute of Plant Protection, St. Petersburg, 2009) [in Russian].

  15. V. V. Morgun, S. Ya. Kots’, and E. V. Kirichenko, “Growth stimulating rhizobacteria and their practical application,” Fiziol. Biokhim. Kul’t. Rast. 41 (3), 187–207 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  16. V. D. Nedorezkov and M. Ya. Menlikiev, “Compatibility of Phytosporin-M with chemical pesticides,” Zashch. Karantin Rast., No. 1, 28–29 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  17. I. I. Novikova, Biological Preparations for Plant Protection, Technologies of Their Preparation and Application (All-Russia Research Institute of Plant Protection, St. Petersburg, 2005), pp. 303–330.

    Google Scholar 

  18. L. I. Pusenkova, E. Yu. Il’yasova, and N. A. Kireeva, “Influence of biopreparations on the biological activity of soil and productivity of sugar beet,” Agrokhimiya, No. 10, 20–26 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  19. D. A. Sutton, A. W. Fothergill, and M. G. Rinaldi, Guide to Clinically Significant Fungi (Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. A. Sinitsyn, Candidate’s Dissertation in Agriculture (Voronezh, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  21. O. I. Stognienko, “Method of count of cryptogamic burden of Cercospora beticola Sacc. and other phytopathogenic and epiphytic fungi on the leaves of sugar beet,” Sakharnaya Svekla, No. 3, 28–31 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  22. O. I. Stognienko, “Frequency of occurrence and population size of soil fungi—pathogens of sugar beet diseases,” Vestn. Zashch. Rast., No. 2, 53–58 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  23. M. G. Sokolova, G. P. Akimova, and O. B. Vaishlya, “Effect of phytohormones synthesized by rhizosphere bacteria on plants,” Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 47 (3), 274–278 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. A. S. Terekhov, G. M. Zenova, P. A. Kozhevin, and N. V. Mikhailova, “Multisubstrate tests of population of soil actinomycetes,” Vestn. Mosk. Univ., Ser. 17: Pochvoved., No. 2, 10–13 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  25. R. M. Khairullin, A. A. Egorshina, M. A. Luk’yantsev, N. A. Urazbakhtina, R. Sh. Irgalina, and A. R. Sakhabutdinova, “Biological features of endophytic strains of Bacillus subtilis as the prospective basis for new biopreparations,” Agrar. Ross., No. 1, 49–53 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  26. E. A. Tsavkelova, S. Yu. Klimova, T. A. Cherdyntseva, and A. I. Netrusov, “Microbial producers of plant growth stimulators and their practical use: a review,” Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 42 (2), 117–126 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. I. P. Yukhin, Cultivation Technology of Sugar Beet in Industrial Zones of Sugar Plants in Bashkortostan (Bashkir State Agricultural Univ., Ufa, 2005) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  28. A. Beneduzi, A. Ambrosini, and L. M. P. Passaglia, “Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): their potential as antagonists and biocontrol agents,” Genet. Mol. Biol. 35 (4), 1044–1051 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. G. Berg, “Plant-microbe interactions promoting plant growth and health: perspectives for controlled use of microorganisms in agriculture,” Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 84 (1), 11–18 (2009). doi 10.1007/s00253-009-2092-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. U. Heimbach, “Erfahrungen mit dem biologischen Pflanzenschutz im Ankerbau in Deutschland,” J. Kulturpflanz. 62 (3), 89–92 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  31. S. E. Lindow and M. T. Brandl, “Microbiology of the phyllosphere,” Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69 (4), 1875–1883 (2003). doi 10.1128/AEM.69.4.1875-1883.2003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. A. Perez-Garcia, D. Romero, and A. Vicente, “Plant protection and growth stimulation by microorganisms: biotechnological applications of Bacilli in agriculture,” Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 22, 187–193 (2011). doi 10.1016/j.copbio.2010.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. M. Schallmey, A. Singh, and O. Ward, “Developments in the use of Bacillus species for industrial production,” J. Microbiol. 50, 1–17 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  34. J. M. van Dijl and M. Hecker, “Bacillus subtilis: from soil bacterium to supersecreting cell factory,” Microb. Cell Fact. 12 (3), 1–6 (2013). doi 10.1186/1475-2859-12-3

    Google Scholar 

  35. L. C. van Loon, “Plant responses to plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria,” Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 119, 243–254 (2007). doi 10.1007/s10658-007-9165-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. X. Wenhao, Z. Li, X. Xin, Q. Yonghua, and Y. Guanghui, “Mutual information flow between beneficial microorganisms and the roots of host plants determined the bio-functions of biofertilizers,” Am. J. Plant Sci. 3, 1115–1120 (2012). doi 10.4236/ajps.2012.38134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. J. M. Whipps, “Microbial interactions and biocontrol in the rhizosphere,” J. Exp. Bot. 52, 487–511 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. I. Pusenkova.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © L.I. Pusenkova, E.Yu. Il’yasova, O.V. Lastochkina, I.V. Maksimov, S.A. Leonova, 2016, published in Pochvovedenie, 2016, No. 10, pp. 1205–1213.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pusenkova, L.I., Il’yasova, E.Y., Lastochkina, O.V. et al. Changes in the species composition of the rhizosphere and phyllosphere of sugar beet under the impact of biological preparations based on endophytic bacteria and their metabolites. Eurasian Soil Sc. 49, 1136–1144 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229316100112

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229316100112

Keywords

Navigation