Skip to main content
Log in

Hydrocarbon status of soils under atmospheric pollution from a local industrial source

  • Soil Chemistry
  • Published:
Eurasian Soil Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Contents and compositions of bitumoids, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and free and retained hydrocarbon gases in soils along a transect at different distances from the local industrial source of atmospheric pollution with soot emissions have been studied. The reserves of PAHs progressively decrease when the distance from the source increases. Among the individual PAHs, the most significant decrease is observed for benzo[a]pyrene, tetraphene, pyrene, chrysene, and anthracene. On plowlands, the share of heavy PAHs—benzo[ghi]perylene, benzo[a]pyrene, perylene, etc.—is lower than in the forest soils. In automorphic soils of the park zone adjacent to the industrial zone, the penetration depth of four-, five-, and sixring PAHs from the atmosphere is no more than 25 cm. In soils under natural forest vegetation, heavy PAHs do not penetrate deeper than 5 cm; in tilled soils, their penetration depth coincides with the lower boundary of plow horizons. Analysis of free gases in the soil air revealed hydrocarbons only under forest. From the quantitative and qualitative parameters of the content, reserves, and compositions of different hydrocarbons, the following modification types of hydrocarbon status in the studied soils were revealed: injection, atmosedimentation–injection, atmosedimentation–impact, atmosedimentation–distant, and biogeochemical types.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. T. A. Alekseeva and T. A. Teplitskaya, Spectral Fluorimetric Analysis of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in the Natural and Technogenic Environments (Gidrometeoizdat, Leningrad, 1981) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. N. Gabov, V. A. Beznosikov, B. M. Kondratenok, and I. V. Gruzdev, “Saturated hydrocarbons in the background and contaminated soils of the Cis-Urals,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 43 (10), 1102–1108 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A. N. Gennadiev, Yu. I. Pikovskii, A. P. Zhidkin, R. G. Kovach, T. S. Koshovskii, M. A. Smirnova, N. I. Khlynina, and A. S. Tsibart, “Factors and features of the hydrocarbon status of soils,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 48 (11), 1193–1206 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. A. A. Krasnopeeva, “Luminescent analysis of petroleum products,” in II International Scientific Conference “Modern Problems of Soil Pollution” (Moscow, 2007), Vol. 2, pp. 200–203.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. A. Krasnopeeva, “Natural bituminoids in soils of the forest zone: luminescence diagnostics and content levels (Satino research station, Moscow State University),” Eurasian Soil Sci. 41 (12), 1282–1293 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Landscapes of Moscow oblast and Their Modern Status, Ed. by I. I. Mamai (Smolensk State University, Smolensk, 1997) [in Russian].

  7. Yu. I. Pikovskii, A. N. Gennadiev, A. A. Krasnopeeva, and T. A. Puzanova, “Natural and technogenic hydrocarbon geochemical fields: concept, typology, and a role as the indicators,” in Geochemistry of Landscapes and Soil Geography (Moscow, 2012), pp. 236–258.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yu. I. Pikovskii, A. N. Gennadiev, A. A. Oborin, T. A. Puzanova, A. A. Krasnopeeva, and A. P. Zhidkin, “Hydrocarbon status of soils in an oil-producing region with karst relief,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 41 (11), 1162–1170 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. S. Ya. Trofimov, O.S. Izkukh, E. S. Vasil’konov, and Yu. A. Zavgorodnyaya, “Behavior of n-alkanes of diesel fuel in urban soil,” in Proceedings of the II International Scientific Conference “Modern Problems of Soil Pollution” (Moscow, 2007), Vol. 2, pp. 327–330.

    Google Scholar 

  10. V. N. Florovskaya, Yu. I. Pikovskii, and N. S. Gracheva, “Luminescent-bituminological analysis of organic substances in nature and technogenic flows,” in Technogenic Flows of Matter in Landscapes and Status of Ecosystems (Nauka, Moscow, 1981), pp. 78–100.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. S. Tsibart and A. N. Gennadiev, “Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soils: sources, behavior, and indication significance (a review),” Eurasian Soil Sci. 46 (7), 728–741 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. C. Bayer, J. Gomes, F. C. B. Vieira, J. A. Zanatta, M. de Cássia Piccolo, and J. Dieckow, “Methane emission from soil under long-term no-till cropping systems,” Soil Tillage Res. 124, 1–7 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Bezabih, W. F. Pellikaan, and W. H. Hendriks, “Using n-alkanes and their carbon isotope enrichments (δ13C) to estimate the botanical composition of pasture mixes from the Mid Rift Valley grasslands of Ethiopia,” Livestock Sci. 142 (1–3), 298–304 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. W. Chang, A. Akbari, J. Snelgrove, D. Frigon, and S. Ghoshal, “Biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons in contaminated clayey soils from a sub-arctic site: the role of aggregate size and microstructure,” Chemosphere 91 (11), 1620–1626 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. E. Eckmeier and G. L. B. Wiesenberg, “Short-chain n-alkanes (C16–20) in ancient soil are useful molecular markers for prehistoric biomass burning,” J. Archaeol. Sci. 36, 1590–1596 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. G. Kalpana, T. Madhavi, D. J. Patil, A. M. Dayal, and S. V. Raju, “Light gaseous hydrocarbon anomalies in the near surface soils of Proterozoic Cuddapah Basin: implications for hydrocarbon prospects,” J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 73 (1–2), 161–170 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. S. Mitra, D. Majumdar, and R. Wassmann, “Methane production and emission in surface and subsurface rice soils and their blends,” Agric., Ecosyst. Environ. 158, 94–102 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. J. Pinedo, R. Ibáñez, J. P. A. Lijzen, and A. Irabien, “Human risk assessment of contaminated soils by oil products: total TPH content versus fraction approach,” Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. Int. J. 20 (5), 1231–1248 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. F. J. Rivas, “Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons sorbed on soils: A short review of chemical oxidation based treatments,” J. Hazard. Mater. 138 (2), 234–251 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. K. R. Tate, “Soil methane oxidation and land-use change—from process to mitigation,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 80, 260–272 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. W. Wilcke, “Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in soil—a review,” J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 163, 229–248 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. N. Gennadiev.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © A.N. Gennadiev, A.P. Zhidkin, Yu.I. Pikovskii, R.G. Kovach, T.S. Koshovskii, N.I. Khlynina, 2016, published in Pochvovedenie, 2016, No. 9, pp. 1068–1078.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gennadiev, A.N., Zhidkin, A.P., Pikovskii, Y.I. et al. Hydrocarbon status of soils under atmospheric pollution from a local industrial source. Eurasian Soil Sc. 49, 1003–1012 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229316090052

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229316090052

Keywords

Navigation