Abstract
Direct measurement of soil moisture has been often expensive and time-consuming. The aim of this study was determining the best method to estimate the soil moisture using the pedotransfer functions in the soil par2 model. Soil samples selected from the database UNSODA in three textures include sandy loam, silty loam and clay. In clay soil, the Campbell model indicated better results at field capacity (FC) and wilting point (WP) with RMSE = (0.06, 0.09) and d = (0.65, 0.55) respectively. In silty loam soil, the Epic model had accurate estimation with MBE = 0.00 at FC and Campbell model had the acceptable result of WP with RMSE = 0.03 and d = 0.77. In sandy loam, Hutson and Campbell models had a better result to estimation the FC and WP than others. Also Hutson model had an acceptable result to estimation the TAW (Total Available Water) with RMSE = (0.03, 0.04, 0.04) and MBE = (0.02, 0.01, 0.01) for clay, sandy loam and silty loam, respectively. These models demonstrate the moisture points had the internal linkage with the soil textures. Results indicated that the PTFs models simulate the agreement results with the experimental observations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Y. Abbasi, B. Ghanbarian-Alavijeh, A. M. Liaghat, and M. Shorafa, “Evaluation of pedotransfer functions for estimating soil water retention curve of saline and saline-alkali soils of Iran,” Pedosphere 21 (2), 230–237 (2011).
M. Acutis and M. Donatelli, “SOILPAR 2.00: software to estimate soil hydrological parameters and functions,” Eur. J. Agron., No. 18, 373–377 (2003).
V. V. Alekseev and I. I. Maksimov, “Aerodynamic method for obtaining the soil water retention curve,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 46 (7), 751–757 (2013). doi 10.1134/S1064229313070028
Y.-D. Botula, W. M. Cornelis, G. Baert, and E. van Ranst, “Evaluation of pedotransfer functions for predicting water retention of soils in Lower Congo (D.R. Congo),” Agric. Water Manage. 111, 1–12 (2012).
R. H. Brooks and A. T. Corey, Hydraulic Properties of Porous Media (Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 1964), p. 27.
Development of Pedotransfer Functions in Soil Hydrology, Eds. by Y. Pachepsky and W. J. Rawls (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2004).
EPIC/ASW Utility in EPIC Utile Source Code (Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Temple, TX, 2006).
G. Fila, G. Bellocchi, M. Acutis, and M. Donatelli, “IRENE: a software to evaluate model performance,” Eur. J. Agron. 18, 369–372 (2003).
W. Gaigai, Z. A. Yulong, and Y. Na, “Prediction of soil water retention and available water of sandy soils using pedotransfer functions,” Proc. Eng. 37, 49–53 (2012).
J. Givi, S. O. Prasher, and R. M. Patel, “Evaluation of pedotransfer functions in predicting the soil water contents at field capacity and wilting point,” Agric. Water Manage. 70, 83–96 (2004).
X. W. Han, M. A. Shao, and R. Horton, “Estimating van Genuchten model parameters of undisturbed soils using an integral method,” Pedosphere 20 (1), 55–62 (2010).
A. Hezarjaribi and H. Sourell, “Feasibility study of monitoring the total available water content using noninvasive electromagnetic induction-based and electrode-based soil electrical conductivity measurements,” Irrig. Drain. 56, 53–65 (2007).
J. L. Hutson and R. J. Wagenet, LEACHM: Leaching Estimation and Chemistry Model—a Process-Based Model of Water and Solute Movement, Transformations, Plant Uptake and Chemical Reactions in the Unsaturated Zone, Version 3 (Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 1992).
C. Manyame, C. L. Morgan, J. L. Heilman, D. Fatondji, B. Gerard, and W. A. Payne, “Modeling hydraulic properties of sandy soils of Niger using pedotransfer functions,” Geoderma 141, 407–415 (2007).
H. Medina, M. Tarawally, A. Del Valle, and M. E. Ruiz, “Estimating soil water retention curve in rhodic Ferralsols from basic soil data,” Geoderma 108, 277–285 (2002).
H. Merdun, “Alternative methods in the development of pedotransfer functions for soil hydraulic characteristics,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 43 (1), 62–71 (2010). doi 10.1134/S1064229310010084
K. E. Saxton and P. H. Willey, The SPAW Model for Agricultural Field and Pond Hydrologic Simulation Watershed Models, Ed. by V. P. Singh and D. K. Frevert (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2006), pp. 401–435.
E. V. Shein and T. A. Arkhangel’skaya, “Pedotransfer functions: sate of the art, problems, and outlooks,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 39 (10), 1089–1099 (2006).
E. V. Shein, A. V. Dembovetsky, and S. S. Panina, “Modeling soil water movement under low head ponding and gravity infiltration using data determined with different methods,” Proc. Environ. Sci. 19, 553–557 (2013).
E. V. Shein, A. M. Rusanov, E. Yu. Milanovskii, D. D. Khaidapova, and E. I. Nikolaeva, “Mathematical models of some soil characteristics: substantiation, analysis, and using features of model parameters,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 46 (5), 541–547 (2013). doi 10.1134/S1064229313050128
A. V. Smagin, “Column centrifugation method for determining water retention curves of soils and disperse sediments,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 44 (4), 416–422 (2012). doi 10.1134/S1064229312040126
M. Th. van Genuchten, “Predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soil,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44, 892–898 (1980).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Published in Russian in Pochvovedenie, 2016, No. 6, pp. 711–719.
The article is published in the original.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bahmani, O., Palangi, S. Evaluation of pedotransfer functions for estimating the soil water retention points. Eurasian Soil Sc. 49, 652–660 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229316060028
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229316060028