Skip to main content
Log in

Changes in the organic matter forms in chernozems of the Kamennaya Steppe under different land uses, locations, and hydromorphism degrees

  • Degradation, Rehabilitation, and Conservation of Soils
  • Published:
Eurasian Soil Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The soils of the Kamennaya Steppe (Voronezh oblast) were studied. The rate of changes in the contents of Corg and the particular forms of organic matter (labile, microbial, and stable) were revealed in the quasi-natural soils of the fallows and shelterbelt and in the arable soils (rainfed farming for 12, 55, 85, and 115 yrs and irrigated farming for 40 yrs) of different positions on the watersheds and slopes. The effect of the increased soil moistening in the recent decades was also studied. In the upper 50 cm of the fallow soils that were not plowed since 1882, the relative Corg accumulation in the recent 30 yrs has amounted to 5%. The soils of the shelterbelt planted in 1903 were similar to the fallow soils. As compared to the soil of the unmown fallow, the Corg loss from the 1-m soil layer under the shelterbelt and the 12-year-old cropland were less than 9%; the losses from the plowed soils (used for 55–115 yrs) were 21–27% on the watersheds and 37–46% on the slopes. In the first decade, the rate of the Corg losses in the 0- to 20-cm layer of the cultivated chernozem was 120 g C/m2. With the increasing duration of the soil plowing (from 55 to 115 yrs), the Corg losses decreased from 45 to 28 g C/m2 per yr in the watershed soils and from 51 to 35 g C/m2 per yr in the soils on the slopes. The maximum loss of Corg was found for the soils on slopes, waterlogged soils, and irrigated soils. In the slope soils, the Corg loss due to erosion was 9–18% of the total. In the upper horizons of the old agrogenic soils, compared to the soil of the unmown fallow, the Cha/Cfa increased, since the content of fulvic acids (FA) faster decreased than that of the humic acids (HA); the C content of the nonhydrolyzable residue was reduced. The slope and waterlogged soils differed from the watershed soils in the smaller amounts of HA and FA and in the greater content of humin carbon. In the 0- to 20-cm layer of the soils studied, the rate of the basal respiration (BR) was 0.2–0.5 μg C/g soil per h, the content of the microbial biomass (Cmicr) was 326–1073 μg C/g, and the share of Cmicr amounted to 1.0–1.9%. These values were minimal in the irrigated soil and maximal in the fallow ones. A high correlation coefficient (r = 0.88–0.92) was found between the Cmicr content and the BR, between the contents of Corg and HA, and between the contents of Corg and mobile C. The correlation coefficient between the contents of Corg and FA and Corg and humin C was 0.67.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  1. P. G. Aderikhin and Z. S. Bogatyreva, “The impact of shelterbelts on the content and properties of organic matter in ordinary chernozems of the Kamennaya steppe,” Pochvovedenie, No. 5, 43–53 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. G. Aderikhin and G. A. Shevchenko, “The composition of humus in chernozems of the central chernozemic region and its changes upon the soil improvement,” Agrokhimiya, No. 5, 82–89 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  3. B. P. Akhtyrtsev, “Transformation of an ordinary chernozem under the impact of an 80-year-old oak stand,” Pochvovedenie, No. 11, 50–58 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Ya. Achkanov and S. A. Nikolaeva, “Secondary hydromorphism of soils in steppe landscapes of the western Ciscaucasus,” Eur. Soil Sci. 32(12), 1269–1276 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  5. O. S. Bezuglova and O. G. Nazarenko, “Genesis and Properties of Mocharic Soils of the Ciscaucasus,” Eur. Soil Sci. 31(12), 1293–1300 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. S. Vladychenskii, A. I. Shcheglov, and D. V. Manakhov, “The content and distribution of humus in the profiles of dark gray forest soils under different plantations,” Vestn. Mosk. Univ., Ser. 17: Pochvoved., No. 1, 22–28 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  7. V. P. Vlasenko, “Development of hydromorphism in soils of agrolandscapes in the depressions of western Ciscaucasia,” Eur. Soil Sci. 42(5), (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  8. F. R. Zaidel’man, V. I. Tyul’panov, E. I. Angelov, and A. I. Davydov, Soils of Mocharic Landscapes: Formation, Agroecology, and Reclamation (Izd. Mosk. Gos. Univ., Moscow, 1998) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yu. N. Zborishchuk, V. T. Rymar’, and Yu. I. Cheverdin, The State of Ordinary Chernozems in the Kamennaya Steppe (Moscow, 2007) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Körschens, “The role of humus content in soil fertility and nitrogen cycle,” Pochvovedenie, No. 10, 42–46 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  11. V. A. Kovda, Soil Cover: Improvement, Use, and Conservation (Nauka, Moscow, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  12. B. M. Kogut, “Principles and methods of assessing the content of labile organic matter in plowed soils,” Eur. Soil Sci. 36(3), 283–290 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  13. B. M. Kogut, N. A. Titova, and V. S. Buleeva, “Anthropogenic transformation of the qualitative composition of humus in chernozems of the Kamennaya Steppe,” Byull. Pochv. Inst. im. V.V. Dokuchaeva, No. 64, 41–49 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. M. Kononova and N. P. Bel’chikova, “Transformation of organic substances in an ordinary chernozem under the Dokuchaev-Kostychev-Williams ameliorative method,” in Problems of Grassland Agriculture (Izd. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Moscow, 1953), Vol. II, pp. 303–360 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. A. Larionova, L. A. Ivannikova, and T. S. Demkina, “Methods to determine the CO2 emission from soils,” in Soil Respiration (NTsBI, Pushchino, 1993), pp. 11–26 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  16. S. V. Ovechkin and V. A. Isaev, “Periodically overmoistened soils of the central chernozemic region,” in Genesis, Anthropogenic Evolution, and Rational Use of Soils (Nauch. Tr. Pochv. Inst. im. V.V. Dokuchaeva) (Moscow, 1989), pp. 18–26 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. S. Orlov and L. A. Grishina, Handbook on Humus Chemistry (Izd. Mosk Gos. Univ., Moscow, 1981) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  18. N. I. Pridvorev, A. V. Dedov, V. V. Verzilin, and N. N. Korolev, “Nonhydrolyzable residue in humus of chernozems,” Eur. Soil Sci. 39(4), 403–409 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Soil Diversity in the Kamennaya Steppe (Pochv. Inst. im. V.V. Dokuchaeva, Moscow, 2009) [in Russian].

  20. E. A. Susyan, N. D. Ananyeva, A. V. Troshin, T. V. Kuznetsova, V. M. Semenov, “The effect of longterm fertilization on respiration of the soil microbial community and on the carbon and nitrogen regimes of gray forest soils,” Agrokhimiya, No. 6, 1–8 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. I. Suchalkina, “Transformation of the organic matter of ordinary chernozems upon grassland agriculture in the Kamennaya Steppe,” Pochvovedenie, No. 2, 449–455 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yu. I. Cheverdin and O. A. Bogatykh, “Ecologic and agrochemical state of soils in the Kamennaya steppe,” Agrokhimich. Vestn. No. 6, 16–18 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  23. G. Ya. Chesnyak, “Determination of the properties of typical deep chernozems with different fertility levels,” in Theoretical Bases of Determining Optimum Soil Properties (Nauch. Tr. Pochv. Inst. im. V.V. Dokuchaeva) (Moscow, 1980), pp. 42–50 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  24. J. P. E. Anderson and K. H. Domsch, “A physiological method for the quantitative measurement of microbial biomass in soils,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 10(3), 215–231 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. T. H. Anderson and K. H. Domsch, “Application of ecophysiological quotients (qCO2 and QD) on microbial biomasses from soils of different cropping histories,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 22 (2), 251–255 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  26. R. Conrad, “Soil microorganisms as controllers of atmospheric trace gases (H2, CO, CH4, OCS, N2O and NO),” Microbiol. Rev. 60(4), 609–640 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  27. H. Insam, “Are the soil microbial biomass and basal respiration governed by the climatic regime?,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 22(4), 525–532 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. H. Insam and K. H. Domsch, “Relationship between soil organic carbon and microbial biomass on chronosequences of reclamation sites,” Microb. Ecol. 15(2), 177–188 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. H. Insam and K. Haselwandter, “Metabolic quotient of the soil microflora in relation to plant succession,” Oecologia 79(1), 174–178 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. D. A. Wardle and D. Parkinson, “Interactions between microclimatic variables and the soil microbial biomass,” Biol. Fertil. Soils 9 (1990).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. E. Prikhod’ko.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © V.E. Prikhod’ko, Yu.I. Cheverdin, T.V. Titova, 2013, published in Pochvovedenie, 2013, No. 12, pp. 1494–1504.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Prikhod’ko, V.E., Cheverdin, Y.I. & Titova, T.V. Changes in the organic matter forms in chernozems of the Kamennaya Steppe under different land uses, locations, and hydromorphism degrees. Eurasian Soil Sc. 46, 1230–1240 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229313120065

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229313120065

Keywords