Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Determination of the soil microbial biomass carbon using the method of substrate-induced respiration

  • Soil Biology
  • Published:
Eurasian Soil Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Specific features of determining the carbon content in the soil microbial biomass using the method of substrate-induced respiration (MBSIR) were studied as related to the conditions of the incubation (the glucose concentration and temperature) and pre-incubation (the duration and temperature) of the soil samples collected in the summer (tundra gley and soddy-podzolic soils and chernozems) and in different seasons (for the gray forest soil). The glucose concentration providing the highest substrate-induced respiration (SIR) in the soils studied was shown to be 2–15 mg/g. The MBSIR in the soil samples collected in summer and in the soils pre-incubated for 10 and 22°C (7 days) did not significantly differ. The MBSIR in the gray forest soil pre-incubated at 3, 6, and 10°C (winter, spring/autumn, and summer, respectively) and at 22°C (recommended by the authors of the SIR method) was similar for the cropland in all the seasons. For the meadow, it was the same in the winter, summer, and autumn, and, in summer, it did not differ only for the forest. For the comparative assessment of the MBSIR, soil samples from different ecosystems are recommended to be collected in the autumn or in the summer. Soil samples of 100–500 g should be pre-incubated for 7 days at 22°C and moisture of 60% of the total water capacity; then, 1-2 g soil should be incubated with glucose (10 mg/g) at 22°C for 3–5 hours.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  1. N. D. Ananyeva, L. M. Polyanskaya, E. A. Susyan, et al., “Comparative Assessment of the Microbial Biomass of Soils Determined by the Methods of Direct Microscopy and Substrate-Induced Respiration,” Mikrobiologiya 77(3), 404–412 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  2. T. G. Mirchink and N. S. Panikov, “Modern Approaches toward the Assessment of the Biomass and Productivity of Fungi and Bacteria in Soil,” Usp. Mikrobiol., No. 20, 198–226 (1985).

  3. V. V. Nikonov, N. V. Lukina, L. M. Polyanskaya, and A. N. Panikova, “Specific Features of the Distribution of Microorganisms in Al-Fe-Humus Podzols of Northern Taiga Spruce Forests: Natural and Technogenic Aspects,” Mikrobiologiya 70(3), 374–383 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  4. O. S. Pavlova, L. M. Polyanskaya, G. A. Kochkina, et al., “Microbial Succession in Soils of the Okskii Reserve,” Pochvovedenie, No. 3, 320–328 (2000) [Eur. Soil Sci. 33 (3), 278–285 (2000)].

  5. L. M. Polyanskaya and D. G. Zvyagintsev, “The Content and Composition of Microbial Biomass as an Index of the Ecological Status of Soil,” Pochvovedenie 38 (6), 706–714 (2005) [Eur. Soil Sci. 38 (6), 625–633 (2005)].

  6. L. M. Polyanskaya, V. V. Nikonov, N. V. Lukina, et al., “Microorganisms of Al-Fe-humus Podzols under Lichen Pine Forests Affected by Aerotechnogenic Pollution,” Pochvovedenie, No. 2, 215–226 (2001) [Eur. Soil Sci. 34 (2), 190–200 (2001)].

  7. J. P. E. Anderson and K. H. Domsch, “A Physiological Method for the Quantitative Measurement of Microbial Biomass in Soils,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 10(3), 215–221 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. E. Blume, M. Bischoff, J. M. Reichert, et al., “Surface and Subsurface Microbial Biomass, Community Structure and Metabolic Activity As a Function of Soil Depth and Season,” Appl. Soil Ecol. 20(3), 171–181 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. A. J. Franzluebbers, F. M. Hons, and D. A. Zuberer, “Seasonal Changes in Soil Microbial Biomass and Mineralizable C and N in Wheat Management Systems,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 26(11), 1469–1475 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. R. G. Joergensen, B. Meyer, and T. Mueller, “Time-Course of Soil Microbial Biomass under Wheat: A One Year Field Study,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 26(8), 987–994 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. R. G. Joergensen and M. Raubuch, “Adenylates in Soil Microbial Biomass at Different Temperatures,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 35(8), 1063–1069 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. E.-A. Kaiser, R. Martens, and O. Heinemyer, “Temporal Changes in Soil Microbial Biomass Carbon in an Arable Soil. Consequences for Soil Sampling,” Plant Soil 170(2), 287–295 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Q. Lin and P. C. Brookes, “An Evaluation of Substrate-Induced Respiration Method,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 31(14), 1969–1983 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. D. Lipson, S. K. Schmidt, and R. K. Monson, “Carbon Availability and Temperature Control the Post-Snow-melt Decline in Alpine Soil Microbial Biomass,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 32(4), 441–448 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. D. D. Patra, P. C. Brookes, K. Coleman, and D. S. Jenkinson, “Seasonal Changes of Soil Microbial Biomass in An Arable and a Grassland Soil Which Have Been Under Uniform Management for Many Years,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 22(6), 739–742 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. O. Priha and A. Smolander, “Fumigation-Extraction and Substrate-Induced Respiration Derived Microbial Biomass C, and Respiration Rate in Limed Soil of Scots Pine Sampling Stands,” Biol. Fertil. Soils 17(4), 301–308 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. G. P. Sparling and B. L. Williams, “Microbial Biomass in Organic Soils: Estimation of Biomass C, and Effect of Glucose or Cellulose Amendments on the Amounts of N and P Released by Fumigation,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 18(5), 507–513 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. D. A. Wardle and D. Parkinson, “Comparison of Physiological Techniques for Estimating the Response of the Soil Microbial Biomass to Soil Moisture,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 22(6), 817–823 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. X. Xu, K. Inubushi, and K. Sakamoto, “Effect of Vegetations and Temperature on Microbial Biomass Carbon and Metabolic Quotients of Temperate Volcanic Forest Soils,” Geoderma 136(1–2), 310–319 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Z. Zhong and F. Makeschin, “Differences of Soil Microbial Biomass and Nitrogen Transformation Under Two Forest Types in Central Germany,” Plant Soil 283, 287–297 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Physicochemical and Biological Problems in Soil Science, Russian Academy of Sciences, ul. Institutskaya 2, Pushchino, Moscow oblast, 142290, Russia

    N. D. Ananyeva, E. A. Susyan & E. G. Gavrilenko

Authors
  1. N. D. Ananyeva
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E. A. Susyan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. E. G. Gavrilenko
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. D. Ananyeva.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © N.D. Ananyeva, E.A. Susyan, E.G. Gavrilenko, 2011, published in Pochvovedenie, 2011, No. 11, pp. 1327–1333.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ananyeva, N.D., Susyan, E.A. & Gavrilenko, E.G. Determination of the soil microbial biomass carbon using the method of substrate-induced respiration. Eurasian Soil Sc. 44, 1215–1221 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229311030021

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229311030021

Keywords